Disagree with you on that. Why Not?
It's not like the Final 4 in basketball. Never will be. They won't play that in one weekend. I don't mind the championship game being a destination, like the Super Bowl. But the semi-finals should be played in the higher ranked team's home field. IMO.
No Disagree and it is like the final 4. Matter of opinion..
The only games that will be at the host site will be tje first round games 12-5 11-6 10-7 and 9 at 8. The quarter finals. The semifinals and finals will all tje Bowl games like Sugar , Rose .cotton etc they will join st all rotate over the years.
That's lame. Get rid of the bowl game tie-ins.
We're not discussing a possible playoffs here. It's already 12-teams. I'm just against using the bowl games in name only for the playoffs. It's been a farce for years.
Why has it been a farce? All those bowl destinations are good places..
The NFL is going to be looking at its cold game playoff policy as it is. I can easily seeing CFB avoiding basically all of it by making post season destination sites across the South or in Domes and not worrying about the years when its -35 @ OSU.
How? Of course they’re relevant.. There just isn’t conference tie in’s except for the New Years6 bowls.
Close.
I would stop thinking of them as bowls. They are basically the premier destinations for post season for anyone under say 45. The Rose Bowl as my dad saw it (now 67) isn't how I (at 41) would see it.
The bowl games are apart of the playoffs which is what I have been trying to tell you.
95% have always been glorified exhibitions. Hell Texas gets to claim a share of a title having it awarded before they lost a bowl game
They are not. It's only in name only. Time to end the charade.
It's a great game. I have both on.Go watch hockey since you’re not watching the NFL playoffs.
I have UConn and Villanova basketball on my other channel better game to watch..It's a great game. I have both on.
Wrong again. B's up 7-4 in 3rd. @planored is watching the Stars and the NFL game with a full house.
Yep good catch. I didn’t mean to put the finals in the rotation of the bowls .
Apparently they are read 9and4 post.. You’ll have a better clue what’s happening..
Yep.
Just because the bowl games glommed on to the playoffs, don't make them bowl games. They should stop calling them bowl games.
They were never relevant. Before the playoffs, three bowls-at the most-had an impact on the MNC. The rest were exhibitions, as intended.
I'm just saying, let's not continue calling the playoff games a bowl game. They need to separate it.
Pretty sure that's happening. 1-4 get byes and 5-12 will be higher seed with home game. How will that affect bowls?? Will 4 top 12 team miss bowls??
Those sponsorship $ are kind of a big deal. Eventually I think the bowl names will go away.
Well yeah. They're just putting off the inevitable. I not sure why sponsors wouldn't support a playoffs sans the bowl games.
