I'm sorry, that's just incorrect.
He also played 2 power 5 teams one being a pretty heavy rivalry game. HH has played 3 cupcakes and 1 big time school. The funny part is HH actually played better again Michigan than he did against the others. Maybe there is hope with that, but like I said, we can agree to disagree. Leadership is the only thing that separates the two.
CU's defense currently ranks 129th out of 133 D1 teams
Of course it does, which is why I said I don’t think he can get there. I really really can’t understand why you and thall are so emotional about this.
It was a rivalry game on the road in a pretty loud environment. I'm not pro Sims and probably lean a little more toward HH, but our offense is god-awful. Sometimes in games it might just take a different guy to get it done. If HH has a stinker like he did on Friday, why not give Sims another chance? If he sucks, then shit ride HH to the end, but I'm all for competition to end the season. QB isn't the only position where this should happen either.
progress isn't linear.
Leadership, ability to generate points, and not turning the ball over are what separates the two. Yknow, the 3 most important parts of being a QB
You have no idea if that happens... It's literally the first game of the year. Who ****in knows. All I know is right now our offense sucks dick. All I'm looking for is a spark to try and get us to bowl eligibility, but we won't make it if HH plays like he did on Friday. As Kong posted, we are 89th in the country in offense with HH and we have to be almost dead last in points scored. A little competition to try and get a better offense wouldn't hurt anything especially when we are that bad. It also might just shut the door on Sims.
our offense is - literally - 50% better today than it was behind Sims from a yardage standpoint and 150% better today from a points scored standpoint
I'm pretty convinced you're just trolling at this point
FWIW CU’s numbers are skewed in part because they played 2 of the better offenses in the country in Oregon and USC.
they're also skewed because they played the 131st offense in the Jeff Sims-led Huskers
Settle down. Most of us on here don't want you getting really upset and then taking it out on your wife.
Unfortunately this site has a lot of trolls. Many fans of other teams post on here and claim to be Husker fans.
No chance we beat Colorado with HH. Let’s be honest.
That would have made up a few TDs? Ok. Our offense is pedestrian with HH too. Our D couldn’t stop their O. We were losing that game with current personnel.
You lose credibility saying beating Illinois on the road in a night game is a cupcake. It's EXACTLY the same game that Sims lost vs Minnesota. To be more specific, that he single handedly lost because of his abysmal performance.
Sure. But turnover machine Sims sure didn't help the defense. There definitely were some major breakdown by the defense in the 2md half. But they looked about gassed and folded when Sims couldn't handle simple. snap.
Agreed - had we only had one turnover vs CO we win that game.
I’m just saying IMO we wouldn’t have beaten CU with HH. Turnovers didn’t help - you’re right.
I didn't lose any credibility. Minnesota was a full stadium and Illinois wasn't and it is also at different times of the year. Minnesota is a bad loss for sure as they should have been a cupcake as well. Also, he played a part in the loss, but if Grant doesn't fumble we probably win that game, but I'm not playing the ifs and buts game. Either way our offense blows and all I was discussing is if we could get a spark from somewhere. I have stated start HH, but we need some sort of spark. Jesus. Never have I seen people more triggered about having discussion on a message board.
Not hanging your defense out to dry before the half. Continue to flip the field and make them drive 75+ yards instead of gifting them field position and momentum with turnovers.
Minnesota just lost to northwestern and had a 50 burger hung on them
