7 or 8. We need a program builder and Rhule fits the bill. Ground rhule double of a hire that hopefully turns into a home run.
I hear this all the time, the what "if" game, should of could of. Let's look at reality, Frost never won more than 4 games a year.On the other hand Mike Riley won 8 one year. 8 should have been fairly easy this year if we had canned Chin before the season and we had been able to keep Casey healthy.
Riley won 9I hear this all the time, the what "if" game, should of could of. Let's look at reality, Frost never won more than 4 games a year.
As for China, he was being hailed by many on here as being the replacement for Frost. Not long after he was canned.
The fact Riley won 8 does say something though. It says that the team Frost inherited wasn't as bad as many thought and it could be done here. Never confuse perception with reality.
Honestly Ted isn't my name it's just a bit of an inside joke with a friend. I just thought the username sounded good LOLDo TalkTed
Just because you’re a former player doesn’t mean you’re smart
This is a perfect analogy for how I feel about the hire from strictly an “excitement” standpoint7 or 8. We need a program builder and Rhule fits the bill. Ground rhule double of a hire that hopefully turns into a home run.
My screen name is totally serious.Honestly Ted isn't my name it's just a bit of an inside joke with a friend. I just thought the username sounded good LOL
only Holtz and Saban won big in college after their failed NFL stints
coaches with college success who failed in the NFL and went back to college and suck (no conf titles) off the top of my head:
greg schiano
mike riley
chip kelly
lane kiffin
kliff kingsbury will follow along soon
That list is endlessCare to compare with college coaches that go from one college to another who also suck (your definition- is not winning a Conf championship)?
Frost went 5-7 in Year 2.I hear this all the time, the what "if" game, should of could of. Let's look at reality, Frost never won more than 4 games a year.
As for Chins, he was being hailed by many on here as being the replacement for Frost. Not long after he was canned.
The fact Riley won 8 does say something though. It says that the team Frost inherited wasn't as bad as many thought and it could be done here. Never confuse perception with reality.
Comparing Rutgers in the Big East to Rutgers in the BIG for Schiano with Rhule at Temple in the Big East and Nebraska in the BIG is downright stupid...but rhule's success in the big east will translate better?
because our division (which likely won't last more than 1 more season) is worse?
Meyer and Fickell were never coming here. We did goodFor me Meyer was a grand slam.
Rhule, Fickell, and Sanders were home runs.
I think we did well.
Perhaps not. I was just looking at the whole field with that comment.Meyer and Fickell were never coming here. We did good
Absolutely no love for my bad rhule puns.7 or 8. We need a program builder and Rhule fits the bill. Ground rhule double of a hire that hopefully turns into a home run.
I like the idea of keeping Mickey, but realistically he is ready to be a coordinator and I can’t see Rhule not bringing in a coordinator of his choosing.9 if no Mickey …10 otherwise
Pretty sure there are way too many reading too much into what @king_kong_ is saying. I am pretty sure he is only saying what I am.....I rated the hire as a 5 on the excitement scale. Does that mean that I am pissed that he is the hire and won't support him? No way. Of course I will. I am just more thinking it's time for someone to prove it.I usually enjoy @king_kong_ posts and takes. While you can look at a whole picture and draw conclusions sometimes it is best to look at year by year results.
At Temple his winning pct increased each year. Same at Baylor. Year over year his teams were better.
If a CEO took over a company and increased profits margin from 20% to 80% over 4 years then took over another company and did the same thing, that would dude or girl would be a highly sought after executive. It wouldn’t matter if either of those companies outperformed all other top companies. That is a very simplistic view of what the CEO accomplished.
If Nebraska improves at the rate that Temple and Baylor improved under Rhule and in 3 years is winning 10 games and competing for league titles, I would view this as a success. If he is middling with Purdue and Minnesota not so much.
why? isn't rutgers the state school for a top 10 population state?Comparing Rutgers in the Big East to Rutgers in the BIG for Schiano with Rhule at Temple in the Big East and Nebraska in the BIG is downright stupid...
why? isn't rutgers the state school for a top 10 population state?
some of our best players in history are from NJ, probably mere hours from wherever rutgers is located & rutgers has been to a bowl more recently than we have as a b1g program
what's the difference between winning at a "nothing program" and winning at a "dumpster fire" in the exact same conference (well, not exact same. Big East was 100x better during the bulk of Schiano's tenure before Rhule got there, but I'm sure you factored that in)?Because Rutgers is a nothing program that GS won at when they were in the Big East and it will be much harder to duplicate that in the BIG. MR took a dumpster fire and won in the Big East, but he is now coaching a blueblood. Thats not comparable.
AYFKM? Your premise is that since GS hasn't duplicated his success that neither will Rhule. Nebraska and Temple are completely different programs, not even in the same stratosphere....what's the difference between winning at a "nothing program" and winning at a "dumpster fire" in the exact same conference (well, not exact same. Big East was 100x better during the bulk of Schiano's tenure before Rhule got there, but I'm sure you factored that in)?
is it easier to duplicate success at one versus the other?
you are getting very defensiveAYFKM? Your premise is that since GS hasn't duplicated his success that neither will Rhule. Nebraska and Temple are completely different programs, not even in the same stratosphere....
2nd choice was Hugh Freeze who turned Trev down. Don't blame him with Auburn callingHe was our 3rd choice which is better than I thought we’d do.
Wrong....again2nd choice was Hugh Freeze who turned Trev down. Don't blame him with Auburn calling
I gave Frost a 5 at his hiring. He was average at best as an OC at Oregon, he always folded in the big games. He caught lightening in a bottle at UCF and used the players left by O'leary to run the table with. Every coach since Frost has had great success there. Frost should keep the money and ride into the sunset, he will never succeed at a major program.frost was a 10 - anybody who says different is a liar
riley yes in the negatives for me (also a gigantically failed NFL coach who was "a college guy")
I'm sorry, I just can't say anymore. I'd like to give you more info. but I cannot out my sourceWrong....again
For me Meyer was a grand slam.
Rhule, Fickell, and Sanders were home runs.
I think we did well.