My take was that the Illinois coach told them to start mugging people in the 2nd half. Nothing to lose. And the refs just let them.
Funny how the officiating changed between the halfs. Or maybe shooting 60% and playing hard nosed D does make a difference or perhaps moving the ball and not just standing out there and hoisting up a long three with time running out on the shot clock. Illinois ratcheted up the D and wasn't giving the perimeter of Nebraska much room to breath and we have no ability to go down low or inside, if they shut down our perimeter game, we are screwed. Illinois didn't allow the switching D to even get set up, they know the drill and just used their athleticism to drive the ball down low and out jump us for 50-50 balls. We have no one who can clean the boards or take the ball to the rack with any authority. Illinois made a concerted effort to drive the ball and get into the paint because we cannot stop anyone there, it worked.Illinois gets away with a blatant travel and Nebraska on the very next possession has Tominaga called for a fictional travel. We were getting mugged in the paint on offense in the second half. Gary breathed on an Illini player and the whistle blew in the second half. We couldn’t match their intensity on D because the zebras wouldn’t allow it.
It was so inconsistent. Several times it was WWE when we were on O, no foul, and then they called a foul for minimal contact on the other end. Shannon is a handful and we couldn't guard him. We also got off our offensive game in the 2nd and forgot we are best when moving the ball for the open shot. But the officiating as a whole was terrible the whole tournament.Funny how the officiating changed between the halfs. Or maybe shooting 60% and playing hard nosed D does make a difference or perhaps moving the ball and not just standing out there and hoisting up a long three with time running out on the shot clock. Illinois ratcheted up the D and wasn't giving the perimeter of Nebraska much room to breath and we have no ability to go down low or inside, if they shut down our perimeter game, we are screwed. Illinois didn't allow the switching D to even get set up, they know the drill and just used their athleticism to drive the ball down low and out jump us for 50-50 balls. We have no one who can clean the boards or take the ball to the rack with any authority. Illinois made a concerted effort to drive the ball and get into the paint because we cannot stop anyone there, it worked.
Shannon had 40 points - tell me how the refs helped him do that? I thought Tominaga got away with several more travels, he has been prone to do that, especially with pressure but again, its all the refs, those dirty cheaters. They must all be from Michigan and I can't imagine the effort it takes to get all these refs to conspire together against us, massive.
Fouls every time someone breathed on him. Next brain buster?Funny how the officiating changed between the halfs. Or maybe shooting 60% and playing hard nosed D does make a difference or perhaps moving the ball and not just standing out there and hoisting up a long three with time running out on the shot clock. Illinois ratcheted up the D and wasn't giving the perimeter of Nebraska much room to breath and we have no ability to go down low or inside, if they shut down our perimeter game, we are screwed. Illinois didn't allow the switching D to even get set up, they know the drill and just used their athleticism to drive the ball down low and out jump us for 50-50 balls. We have no one who can clean the boards or take the ball to the rack with any authority. Illinois made a concerted effort to drive the ball and get into the paint because we cannot stop anyone there, it worked.
Shannon had 40 points - tell me how the refs helped him do that? I thought Tominaga got away with several more travels, he has been prone to do that, especially with pressure but again, it’s all the refs, those dirty cheaters. They must all be from Michigan and I can't imagine the effort it takes to get all these refs to conspire together against us, massive.
We both know you didn’t watch the game.NU wins the first half by 12: GREAT GAME
NU gets smoked in the second half: The refs!!!
Fouls: 18-19
NU wins the first half by 12: GREAT GAME
NU gets smoked in the second half: The refs!!!
Fouls: 18-19
Choke show....we will likley never win a tournament game this year.Huskers enter today winning 7 of their last 8 games and are 23-9 and looking to play in the conference tournament championship..
Illini have won 6 of their last 8 games and stand 24-8
Huskers lost February 4, 87-84 in OVT in Champaign.
Should be a fun afternoon.
Go to bedChoke show....we will likley never win a tournament game this year.
It wasn't a girls game!We both know you didn’t watch the game.
Go to any fan site and it's the same. When things aren't going right, it has to be the refs. And that 18-19 foul comparison says it was not all one-sidedNU wins the first half by 12: GREAT GAME
NU gets smoked in the second half: The refs!!!
Fouls: 18-19
Go to any fan site and it's the same. When things aren't going right, it has to be the refs. And that 18-19 foul comparison says it was not all one-sided
Don’t call him a simpleton. He went to a directional school.This comment - and the others like it - is a simpleton’s analysis of how the entire game was officiated. The first and second half were completely different. If the style of play was called consistently, there would gave been a wide disparity in the number of fouls called on Illinois. They would have had to go deep into their bench, which is not their strength. They then are also unable to get into the flow of their offense and would have needed to play more passively on defense.
In summary, for the simpletons, it is not just how many fouls are called but how many, what types, when are they called in the game, are the same types of fouls called against both teams, etc. It really is about consistency as I have said many times. Not only what is called but what is not called. Not only with fouls but also violations.
The first half was consistent for both teams. The second half definitely favored Illinois. Examples are plentiful.
Excuses, excuses, excuses !!!! I also watched the game and calling the 2nd half by NU a complete collapse would be an understatementThis comment - and the others like it - is a simpleton’s analysis of how the entire game was officiated. The first and second half were completely different. If the style of play was called consistently, there would have been a wide disparity in the number of fouls called on Illinois. They would have had to go deep into their bench, which is not their strength. They then are also unable to get into the flow of their offense and would have needed to play more passively on defense.
In summary, for the simpletons, it is not just how many fouls are called but how many, what types, when are they called in the game, are the same types of fouls called against both teams, etc. It really is about consistency as I have said many times. Not only what is called but what is not called. Not only with fouls but also violations.
The first half was consistent for both teams. The second half definitely favored Illinois. Examples are plentiful.
It wouldn’t be a Husker game thread if people weren’t complaining about the refs. Some of our fans are right up there with Iowa State and KState fans. Boooooooooo!
Really? 18 to 19 total fouls ---- OKIf it was just bitching to be bitching, then I would tend to consider your point a bit more. Or if there were just a few examples where things didn't go NUs way. But the examples of where calls / non-calls clearly favored Illinois are numerous. I have no idea who ultimately would have won - likely Illinois because they were shooting lights out, especially from 3s - but to say the officiating was not a sizable contributing factor to the final outcome is being willfully blind.
Really? 18 to 19 total fouls ---- OK
You are just plain thick headed or probably never played a sport. The foul numbers difference doesn’t always tell you how the game was called or not called.Really? 18 to 19 total fouls ---- OK
You want the refs to stop calling fouls? Adjust to the game and stop fouling. It's a simple as that. Huskers were shorthanded and tired in the second half. Legs were gone. That leads to (many) missed shots and being a step slow on defense, which leads to unnecessary fouls.If it was just bitching to be bitching, then I would tend to consider your point a bit more. Or if there were just a few examples where things didn't go NUs way. But the examples of where calls / non-calls clearly favored Illinois are numerous. I have no idea who ultimately would have won - likely Illinois because they were shooting lights out, especially from 3s - but to say the officiating was not a sizable contributing factor to the final outcome is being willfully blind.
Score was 57-45 NU with 16 mins left. Then Nebraska got called for fouls on 6 of IL’s next seven possessions. So six fouls called in like 2 minutes Changed the game and Nebraska couldn’t answer.Again, you never dispute any of the numerous examples of calls / non-calls and only fall back to the number of fouls called for the entire game. That is a simpleton response, at best. Give some examples of your own where Illinois was disadvantaged significantly from how the game was officiated, if you can. You won’t be able to but I am willing to listen and change my opinion.
They did look tired. No excuse. Tired of excuses. they almost won but that's a bad loss up that many points. Yea it happens.You want the refs to stop calling fouls? Adjust to the game and stop fouling. It's a simple as that. Huskers were shorthanded and tired in the second half. Legs were gone. That leads to (many) missed shots and being a step slow on defense, which leads to unnecessary fouls.
Most coaches will say "if you want to blame the refs when you lose, you need to give them credit when you win." Illinois had better players and played harder than us yesterday. It happens.
That’s exactly what I was thinking at the time. Ref’s were calling ticky tack fouls on us during that duration..Score was 57-45 NU with 16 mins left. Then Nebraska got called for fouls on 6 of IL’s next seven possessions. So six fouls called in like 2 minutes Changed the game and Nebraska couldn’t answer.
Are you high?If we do not win a game this season really is not much different than any other season.
I also wish we would have played a little zone just to keep their stud guard in check a little bit. He was just faster than us today especially after we missed a shot and they transitioned. Try anything to stop the bleeding as momentum kept getting lost with all the called fouls and their speed.
Not at all. Unless we win a game it's really no differemt is it? Oh it was nore exciting I'll give you that.Are you high?
Not at all. Unless we win a game it's really no differemt is it? Oh it was nore exciting I'll give you that.