You related to Top Kong?Agree. But you said “HH will never give us the best chance to win”. Which is absolutely not true. You have no idea if DR will be a better college qb than HH for the season opener. Long term? Of course. But not day 1
You related to Top Kong?Agree. But you said “HH will never give us the best chance to win”. Which is absolutely not true. You have no idea if DR will be a better college qb than HH for the season opener. Long term? Of course. But not day 1
So SIMS should have started over HH? Seems HH gave us the best chance to win many times this last year. Doesn’t mean he’s good. Just better than anyone else on the roster. And until DR gets in a game, relying on a true freshman to read defenses and be more effective than a guy that’s been in the system and played vs big ten defenses is a risk. I’d rather take that risk and play DR. Doesn’t mean our record with DR would be better than with HH. We don’t know.Give me a break HH isn’t the best chance to win now or any other time..
3rd string insurance policy is what he will become..
We already sacrificed 2023 cause we didn’t have any quality QB’s.
Cmon Forrest..
I’m not a HH fan so no. I think Chubba was better than HH. But anyone getting upset at me just suggesting that DR won’t be better than HH from day 1 is just being ridiculous. I hope DR is better. But relying on a true frosh qb, having never played a down of college football to win 6 games sounds steep.You related to Top Kong?
Dylan not ready is still better than our room. Will he be a Heisman Finalist - highly doubtful. Will he be better than our 3 QB’s last year … absolutely.This is the thing most husker fans don’t get. There’s a number 1 high school qb every year. They don’t always start and rarely set the world on fire. Are we ready for Dylan to not be ready? We better be…
Just an opinion. What if he is not? He may very well be ready. I hope he is. I hope he’s a heisman finalist. But the suggestion a true freshman qb won’t beat out HH from day 1 shouldn’t be that controversial. Arch didn’t start. Ewers didn’t start. Fields didn’t start. Who was the last top freshman qb to start game 1? I realize our qb room is worse than all those teams, but it’s possible he’s not ready to go out win games even if he does beat out HHDylan not ready is still better than our room. Will he be a Heisman Finalist - highly doubtful. Will he be better than our 3 QB’s last year … absolutely.
You're crazy.IMO, I think they have a spring transfer FCS walkon that will be in the program all summer that takes the first snaps against UTEP. Call me crazy!
Yep. Only, what, 6-7 years left now?The world is already in the process of coming to an end, so that will just speed it up.
That’s not true. The defense won the games. If HH played great, despite the players around him, then you could say he won games. He was as much of the problem as the rest of the Offensive players trying to give the game away.We all hope this is true, but HH won multiple games as a starter, will be healthy and we have no idea how Dylan will adjust to the college game. I think Dylan will be fine and be the day 1 starter, but I’m also prepared for him not to be, to struggle year 1 and sacrifice another year for the long term rebuild. Is everyone else? Because it’s possible. Putting all your eggs in a true freshman qb is risky business.
Sorry. I didn’t see this post before I replied. It’s 💯HH didn’t win shit. Our defense won those games. If we had had an average defense those would have all been losses. Our offense last year was the worst in the entire history of modern Husker football. And total crap QB play was a huge reason why. HH stinks as a QB. One of the worst I have ever seen at NU. He is an emergency use backup and nothing more.
Better hope so, literally. Dude gets in there unlearned and gets hurt...well...Dylan will be protected
Careful. Logic and reasonable expectations aren’t well received around here.It seems several questions have been raised here. Is DR going to start? Is DR going to be ready to start? Would HH be a better option at the start of the year? Who gives us a better chance to win?.
Just starting doesn't mean that much given that room. 2 freshmen and a great kid playing out of position.
The now retired Nick Saban was very much opposed to playing freshmen QBs. Some of his concern is they could get so beat up mentally they may never recover.
There is absolutely no way we can draw any conclusions on DR or DKs ability at this level come August. The game will be a whole new level. We can learn some things but overall, there is a ton to learn.
I feel safe in saying it is likely one or both freshmen get playing time because of injuries. Assume DR starts and gets hurt, who comes in? The offense changes completely with HH and injuries caught up to him as well. Dk will likely get rushed into service sometime, that could be interesting.
Where are the guys on here who were quick to pull a QB when he makes a mistake and have him watch a few series from the sideline? Whi would you do this with assuming DR is the starter?
I would like to see what the records are for freshmen QBs right out of HS. He is expected to learn the play books, make reads and all this with a set of WR that are new as well.
Our QB room wasn’t just worse than those you teams you mentioned - it wasn’t even in the same stratosphere.Just an opinion. What if he is not? He may very well be ready. I hope he is. I hope he’s a heisman finalist. But the suggestion a true freshman qb won’t beat out HH from day 1 shouldn’t be that controversial. Arch didn’t start. Ewers didn’t start. Fields didn’t start. Who was the last top freshman qb to start game 1? I realize our qb room is worse than all those teams, but it’s possible he’s not ready to go out win games even if he does beat out HH
You must hate winningWe are in trouble if it’s HH
No need to be a Debbie downer on January 21..It’s going to be ugly on this board if DR looks like a freshman this year.
Trevor Lawrence. We’re winning the nattie.It seems several questions have been raised here. Is DR going to start? Is DR going to be ready to start? Would HH be a better option at the start of the year? Who gives us a better chance to win?.
Just starting doesn't mean that much given that room. 2 freshmen and a great kid playing out of position.
The now retired Nick Saban was very much opposed to playing freshmen QBs. Some of his concern is they could get so beat up mentally they may never recover.
There is absolutely no way we can draw any conclusions on DR or DKs ability at this level come August. The game will be a whole new level. We can learn some things but overall, there is a ton to learn.
I feel safe in saying it is likely one or both freshmen get playing time because of injuries. Assume DR starts and gets hurt, who comes in? The offense changes completely with HH and injuries caught up to him as well. Dk will likely get rushed into service sometime, that could be interesting.
Where are the guys on here who were quick to pull a QB when he makes a mistake and have him watch a few series from the sideline? Whi would you do this with assuming DR is the starter?
I would like to see what the records are for freshmen QBs right out of HS. He is expected to learn the play books, make reads and all this with a set of WR that are new as well.
If you watched a game last year, then you would knowThis is the thing most husker fans don’t get. There’s a number 1 high school qb every year. They don’t always start and rarely set the world on fire. Are we ready for Dylan to not be ready? We better be…
I seriously don’t get the mystery of having a true freshman start. Every fan has seen this from the Martinez boys. It’s not some unicorn situation where a freshman can come in and start. Also the fact that we actually have some tune-up games vs a division foe on the road at night.Trevor Lawrence. We’re winning the nattie.
DR is already a better college QB, and he hasn’t attended a class yetAgree. But you said “HH will never give us the best chance to win”. Which is absolutely not true. You have no idea if DR will be a better college qb than HH for the season opener. Long term? Of course. But not day 1
Your statement alone admits that is nothing more than an opinion and not a fact. You can’t be objectively better and never played. Literally impossible.DR is already a better college QB, and he hasn’t attended a class yet
Didn’t start week 1. Kelly Bryant did.Trevor Lawrence. We’re winning the nattie.
Oh well the board will be a blast when we can only use facts.Your statement alone admits that is nothing more than an opinion and not a fact. You can’t be objectively better and never played. Literally impossible.
Yeah, it is that controversial. HH isn’t a QB, at least, not a good one. This isn’t a question of two QB’s with a similar skill set and the incumbent has been good but the new kid is highly rated. They are entirely different. The O is going to be put in place for DR and DK to run, not HH.Just an opinion. What if he is not? He may very well be ready. I hope he is. I hope he’s a heisman finalist. But the suggestion a true freshman qb won’t beat out HH from day 1 shouldn’t be that controversial. Arch didn’t start. Ewers didn’t start. Fields didn’t start. Who was the last top freshman qb to start game 1? I realize our qb room is worse than all those teams, but it’s possible he’s not ready to go out win games even if he does beat out HH
You can use logic and have reasonable expectations and still say HH doesn’t start. He is not a QB. You would have two totally different offenses if you plan on starting HH and working in the Freshman. HH doesn’t fit the offense this staff wants to run.Careful. Logic and reasonable expectations aren’t well received around here.
Nice strawman. But when I bring a perfectly plausible scenario to a discussion, you can’t dismiss it with “matter of fact” opinion. Making outright statements of fact that are nothing more than an opinion is not an argumentOh well the board will be a blast when we can only use facts.
Yet you state as fact something which you couldn’t possibly know in the post that I responded to. Goose meet gander.Your statement alone admits that is nothing more than an opinion and not a fact. You can’t be objectively better and never played. Literally impossible.
Never said HH will start. I said it’s possible HH gives us the best chance to win because we don’t know how DR will perform at this level from day 1. I’m on board starting DR even if it means short term struggles. But can this fanbase handle DR not being great from day 1? Idk the answer to thatYou can use logic and have reasonable expectations and still say HH doesn’t start. He is not a QB. You would have two totally different offenses if you plan on starting HH and working in the Freshman. HH doesn’t fit the offense this staff wants to run.
The only fact I stated is that we don’t know how DR will perform. That’s objectively true. Not a contradiction at all. Take your goose home and try again .Yet you state as fact something which you couldn’t possibly know in the post that I responded to. Goose meet gander.
“‘HH will never give us the best chance to win.’ Which is absolutely not true.”The only fact I stated is that we don’t know how DR will perform. That’s objectively true. Not a contradiction at all. Take your goose home and try again .
Best check yo’ self before you riggity riggity wreck yo’ selfNice strawman. But when I bring a perfectly plausible scenario to a discussion, you can’t dismiss it with “matter of fact” opinion. Making outright statements of fact that are nothing more than an opinion is not an argument