..and USC's wins restored?
I think yes on Bush, 100% but not sure bout USC wins. Curious what others think.
I think yes on Bush, 100% but not sure bout USC wins. Curious what others think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?..and USC's wins restored?
I think yes on Bush, 100% but not sure bout USC wins. Curious what others think.
Why?
I think he should get it back. What he accomplished on the field is why he got the Heisman don’t care if he was paid lolHe lost it for something they later made legal.
It's just a random thought that popped in my head adter seeing him in some commercials recently
Ok. Was wondering if there was some new info that came out.He lost it for something they later made legal.
It's just a random thought that popped in my head adter seeing him in some commercials recently
Wrong. It remains impermissible for a player to accept money, gifts and housing for his family from an agent looking to sign him. it was impermissible then and still is.He lost it for something they later made legal.
It's just a random thought that popped in my head adter seeing him in some commercials recently
Wrong. It remains impermissible for a player to accept money, gifts and housing for his family from an agent looking to sign him. it was impermissible then and still is.
Also, keep in mind that the NCAA had nothing to do with him losing his Heisman. The Heisman Trust polls all potential candidates and has them swear/affirm that, among other things, they are eligible to play college football during the season in which they are up for the award. Bush lied, as him and his family accepting the items from the agency rendered him ineligible during the season in which he won the award. The Heisman trust vacated the award; the NCAA had nothing to do with it.
he cleans it with an old pair of gloves on and this pair seem to fitdid they take oj's?
Sure he should, ou in 1975 I believe won the nc in one poll because they played a in eligible player, Clemson kept there nc in 1981 after it was revealed they cheated. His accomplishments were on field. The biggest question is would have Reggie still went to usc if he wouldn’t have been paid. Imo he still would have let him have it..and USC's wins restored?
I think yes on Bush, 100% but not sure bout USC wins. Curious what others think.
Exactly. He lost it for something they later made legal. It was illegal when he did it. Why should he get it back?He lost it for something they later made legal.
It's just a random thought that popped in my head adter seeing him in some commercials recently
If you got a speeding ticket in 1980 for going 70 mph on I80 should you get your money back in 2000 when they raised it to 70?
Well, it was to save energy in the 70s, it just happened to also reduce the number of accidents.I got a speeding ticket on I80 for going 68 back in 1995.
The speed limit on I80 was 55 not all that long ago. 55 MPH on an actual interstate that everybody should be able to safely travel at 85 to 90 MPH.
Our really smart people in Congress felt we would save numerous lives by dropping speed limits around the country back then.
“Later made legal”…. No. He was operating under the same rules as everyone else, and broke them. Rules change.He lost it for something they later made legal.
It's just a random thought that popped in my head adter seeing him in some commercials recently
Yes. ReparationsIf you got a speeding ticket in 1980 for going 70 mph on I80 should you get your money back in 2000 when they raised it to 70?
..and USC's wins restored?
I think yes on Bush, 100% but not sure bout USC wins. Curious what others think.