No truer words spoken on here. We will not win again this yr without Tommy.We all hope TA returns this week because we have no shot without him.
No truer words spoken on here. We will not win again this yr without Tommy.We all hope TA returns this week because we have no shot without him.
Best post of the threadSince there are so many conflicting suggestions on what I am supposed to think, I guess I am stuck living with my own opinions.
I expected NU to lose last night. Something like 31-13. I did not expect a 59 point humiliation (note that I am using the term 'humiliation' in the context of sports - I was not personally humiliated nor is my lot in life changed by the outcome of this game, but thanks for caring). Last night was every bit as bad as the 3 blow-outs to Wisconsin, the earlier blow-out to OSU, and various other epic failures we've endured the past decade-plus. According to some in this thread, I was foolish to expect NU to be competitive last night.
One point of frustration is that NU took a big fat steamy dump on all of the favorable attention they received the previous week. How many times has this board lamented NU's lack of relevance the past 15 years? Well, NU was relevant. For 6 days. The next shot a relevance isn't likely to occur until next October, when NU once again faces Wisconsin and OSU in back-to-back games.
I hope Tommy Armstrong is cleared to play next week. I don't think NU will win any game without him at QB. It is hard to believe that Nebraska's QB depth chart is so fragile. It's been that way for a decade, it seems. There are many reasons for that, I suppose. One of which seems to be the previous staff's undervaluing of the QB position - or at least their inability to recruit more than one reasonable QB candidate every 4 years.
7-2 after tOSU. Every single poster would have taken this record at the start of the year.
Every. Last. Poster.
Let's hope Tommy clears concussion protocol and can go next week.
GBR.
Our AD said so himself...while winning games is nice, but winning games that matter is important. Last night was a game that mattered, big time, ....and we lost 62-3 and our "experienced" DC looked like a complete fool the entire night. I don't think many thought we could pull out the win but last night was an embarrassment of epic proportions.
No truer words spoken on here. We will not win again this yr without Tommy.
Nobody is defending the loss. It is what it is.
But people who thought we were going to be competitive last night were being completely foolish.
Nobody is defending the loss. It is what it is.
But people who thought we were going to be competitive last night were being completely foolish.
The injuries have decimated the offense. The o-line is razor thin without depth and they are the walking wounded. Carter, Ozigbo, Westy, Brandon are all hurt and missing playing time yet we played one hell of a game against Wisconsin and had our opportunity for a win stolen. Ohio State is bigger and deeper on the lines so because of our injuries we couldn't stop or defend ourselves. I'm just truly disgusted how the Scott Frost backers turned on Mike Riley especially since we all know and understand football. I didn't expect a huge blowout loss but Ohio State was literally the worst matchup possible coming off a heartbreaking loss to Wisconsin.
It's about competition not controversy. If POB cannot compete for the starting position next year, I would expect him to transfer.I'm not close enough to the program, so I have to piece things together.
If TA can't play, Fyfe will be the starter. Mike Riley is too smart to start a qb controversy. It appears that Tanner Lee is the anointed starter for next year. If POB or Darlington can be decent (god forbid a good game), we'd have a controversy next year.
It's about competition not controversy. If POB cannot compete for the starting position next year, I would expect him to transfer.
Why would he transfer? Tanner Lee has 1-2 years to play for us... If POB doesn't beat him out, are you suggesting he will simply go somewhere else? Not everybody bugs out when things don't go there way, and I would hope that if POB isn't the guy next year, he sticks it out and pays his dues... These coaches have put QBs in the NFL, and he could be the next one... If things get rough, knuckle down...It's about competition not controversy. If POB cannot compete for the starting position next year, I would expect him to transfer.
Why would he transfer? Tanner Lee has 1-2 years to play for us... If POB doesn't beat him out, are you suggesting he will simply go somewhere else? Not everybody bugs out when things don't go there way, and I would hope that if POB isn't the guy next year, he sticks it out and pays his dues... These coaches have put QBs in the NFL, and he could be the next one... If things get rough, knuckle down...
Your thinly veiled attack on Danny Langsdorf is noted. Just because Langsdorf transferred out when he played and wasn't the starter, does not mean it's a character flaw.
I don't think he was calling DL out at all. Especially after saying that these "coaches" have put QBs into the NFL. He is giving credit to DL. Timsunn doesn't operate that way. At least I haven't seen him do so.
7-2 after tOSU. Every single poster would have taken this record at the start of the year.
Every. Last. Poster.
Let's hope Tommy clears concussion protocol and can go next week.
GBR.
My point is that there is ALWAYS completion and there should never be a fear of controversy. Best man plays whether he is a redshirt freshman or a junior/senior transfer. No reason to transfer, but want to compete.Why would he transfer? Tanner Lee has 1-2 years to play for us... If POB doesn't beat him out, are you suggesting he will simply go somewhere else? Not everybody bugs out when things don't go there way, and I would hope that if POB isn't the guy next year, he sticks it out and pays his dues... These coaches have put QBs in the NFL, and he could be the next one... If things get rough, knuckle down...
What?!?!Your thinly veiled attack on Danny Langsdorf is noted. Just because Langsdorf transferred out when he played and wasn't the starter, does not mean it's a character flaw.
Where do you come up with this crap? Wisconsin, Indiana, Northwestern, and Penn State were all very competitive with OSU, but Nebraska fans were delusional because we expected similar results?? C'mon man. I would have been OK losing by 2, or possibly even 3 TDs, but a 60-point loss warrants every bit of criticism the coaches are receiving.
And another thing.. Can we finally allow this narrative of "People just waiting to pounce on our coaches" to just die the undignified death that it deserves to die? All the conspiracy theorists can finally let this one go. Sure, there are people that for some odd reason want to be proven right about firing Blo or hiring Riley both being mistakes, but the vast majority of fans just want to see good performances on the field, whether it is Blo, Riley, or Bill Parcells.
The 'normal' Nebraska fan doesn't continue to harbor resentment to the level you are suggesting. We just want to see the team being competitive on a regular basis, even if we lose. That's why there was the amount of pride we all had after losing to Wisconsin the way we did. We truly saw progress vs the blowouts that Blo seemed to give us 2-3 times a year.
That's why the 60-point loss is bringing this sort of reaction. With Indiana, Northwestern, Wisconsin, and Penn State being competitive with them, we didn't see any of this beatdown coming.
1) It's not a conspiracy. That kind of posting was happening. And it's no surprise. There is a group of posters that routinely get banned for this kind of crap. To your point about the average fan: I obviously agree with that.
2) We snuck by Indiana. We are lucky to have played Northwestern early. Wisconsin is better than us. Penn State is certainly playing better than us. And we had to bring in Fyfe in the freaking second quarter. Have people forgotten Purdue last year? The second he came in the game everyone should have seen what was going to happen. That doesn't excuse the way we lost. It was brutal. But if you thought we were going to do anything other than get blown out once Fyfe came in the game I don't know what to say.
I just don't know what option we have right now. The only positive is we're not going to be running against Wisconsin and Ohio State's defensive. Literally our only option is to play pitch-and-catch. Our offensive line is decimated... Ozigbo is hurt. Instead of listing people whose hurt we should list people who are healthy. I think there's only 3 people on the whole offensive side that's healthy at this point. And what I mean by healthy I mean if we actually had any depth these hurt guys wouldn't be playing.Everybody but....Langsdorf? How does one excuse our run to pass ratio the moment Fyfe entered in to the game? Lets hope if Fyfe must start this Saturday our OC doesn't ask him to spin the ball 50 times.
Everybody but....Langsdorf? How does one excuse our run to pass ratio the moment Fyfe entered in to the game? Lets hope if Fyfe must start this Saturday our OC doesn't ask him to spin the ball 50 times.
I think it's simple, actually. We wanted to get him as many live reps as possible because our starter had just been taken off on a stretcher. Fyfe doesn't need practice handing the ball off, and there is no question about it, we aren't going to win down the stretch (with Fyfe as the starter) by throwing the ball 10 times a game. Our running games simply isn't good enough and our line can't block consistently (...or sometimes at all).
Let him get all the reps leading up to the Minnesota game then...the moment Tommy was knocked out and we failed to convert on 4th and 1 that was a run out the clock situation. I fail to see how throwing Fyfe into the fire and him going 5/18 really benefited him. Instead...Langsdorf decides to throw the ball 16 times compared to running the ball 6 times in the second half. One led to a pick six. Below were our runs in the second half....even though our defense could not get one stop the entire game Langsdorf deserves quite a bit of blame as well for the final score.
7 yards
1 yard
7 yards
17 yards
2 yards
4 yards
I'm talking about game reps, obviously. Against a live defense that is trying to destroy you.
Running the ball a lot more makes a blowout a touch less of a blowout. Big deal. Langs decided to get him reps so he was more preparred to run the offense against Minnesota if need be, and frankly, that game is far more important moving forward than whether the final score against tOSU was 62-3 or 48-3.
We will have to agree to disagree on this one. With Fyfe's output during that game I say it did him more harm than good. Hopefully we don't have to worry about it and Tommy can play this weekend.
The Sam McKewon belief of "run the ball" is utter garbage. It's just like his "need more Nebraska kids" rhetoric that he's been pushing out for the last year. Utter garbage.
7-2 after tOSU. Every single poster would have taken this record at the start of the year.
Every. Last. Poster.
Let's hope Tommy clears concussion protocol and can go next week.
GBR.
What does the fan base have to do with a serious ass kicking.
The injuries have decimated our already thin offense. The linemen started going down then Carter hurt. The Ozigbo messed up his ankle then receivers started going down. It's a mess.Saturday night was the result of Pelini's recruiting by car. Most of us have know this disaster would show up playing a quality team. Even the cellar dwellers get motivated & give it their best to play the once mighty HUSKERS.
Coach Riley must be given time to restore talent. What Pelini did was years in the making & now we live with it.
GBR!
The injuries have decimated our already thin offense. The linemen started going down then Carter hurt. The Ozigbo messed up his ankle then receivers started going down. It's a mess.
Terrible line effort and coachingSo....what is the defense's excuse?
Terrible line effort and coaching