I've explained it clearly that only the principal players for the most part get SAG if it's in their contracts. It's not a right from GOD. Kong man thinks there's some relation though to this and college athletes playing in games.
You can't revisit contracts that were not determined to be unconscionable at the time. Those players are no longer (if they were really ever) under contract to the NCAA. There are property rights and those highlights are the property of the NCAA. It's highly debatable that the recent court decisions have rendered all contracts in the past unenforceable, but that's not even the point. The NCAA can use their property as they like and the players have no contract with them. Under their logic, any time that someone uses the image of Abraham Lincoln, his estate and family is entitled to NIL money. Man, in this world, I'd love to be a descendant of Jesus. Too bad he didn't have any kids.
100% false. If the contract is still being enforced against the signer then it is still open to litigate whether it is null and void. As far as there being no contract with the NCAA, you don't need a contract to demand compensation for the use of your name and likeness to make a profit
I wouldn't be surprised if there was a large donation in both names to TeamMates or the Brook Berringer Foundation or some other agreed upon org as part of the commissioning of that statue
I doubt that That clause would exist today because of what NIL has become. But back when these kids signed NIL was a non thing. It will be interesting.
You can say 100% false all you want, but the point is that in this case, there is NO contract. You can demand compensation all you want, but that doesn't mean you're entitled to it.
Your position is so strong you concede you’re wrong but make the very rational excuse it’s because the “man” wants to push money to the “people.” The NCAA settles these cases because they know that they will lose in court whether by judge or jury. I love arguing with people whose positions bear no resemblance to reality.
How in GOD's name did I concede that I was wrong?
Please stop confusing your Holiday Inn Express room card for @mgbreis’s J.D.
So we are saying 20 years ago athletes had undue leverage on them to play basketball for KU?
What's really pathetic is someone who doesn't have an original thought in their head, they just parrot what other people say and throw out a credential. What you're essentially saying is that since mgbreis is apparently a lawyer, then his opinions are sacrosanct, which is REALLY interesting since lawyers make their livings arguing that other lawyer's opinions are bullshit. You must think you have to be a lawyer to have an opinion on this matter because that's the only rationale you've provided to justify your lame position on the matter.
wait, now you've forgotten that I was the first to respond?
yes. of course.
wait, now you've forgotten that I was the first to respond?
If not mistaken this guy was a big proponent of the jab and the boosters. He was with the medical industrial complex that would flatten the curve, I kept telling him it was about flattening the pulse.
I don’t doubt that some could have made more money - but let’s not pretend getting scholarship for school and clothing and top of the line food options are the equivalent of forced labor.
Let’s not pretend a governing body actively forbidding & preventing independent enterprise is the equivalent of parenting, either, and we have a deal
I’m not sure how many ways I can tell you you’re wrong in the same thread.
You just can't argue you're point, can you?
this is the point. You’re arguing it for me.
