I know that Purdue fan will be here in 1.21 gigawatts to explain why 4.5 is way off and they will win 8 games but I thought I would still post this.
Purdue is going in the wrong direction. They may struggle to get to 4.
I know that Purdue fan will be here in 1.21 gigawatts to explain why 4.5 is way off and they will win 8 games but I thought I would still post this.
Agreed. Even with their great year last year there were a few games that they could have lost.Without looking at the Huskies schedule 7.5 seems really optimistic. They lost a ton.
I’m not into numbers. Pelini only solidified that perspective for me by barely beating shitty teams and getting bent over by teams like Wisconsin.Despite being a young team at many positions, there is still tons of veteran talent on both side of the ball. I predict a Pelini like year with comfortable wins against the bad to mediocre teams, but being either outclassed or talented by the truly good teams. So, I guess 9-4 as our final record including bowl outcome.
Main issue last year was the turnovers. The passing game, injuries and kicking game were also bad but if we get to average turnovers we can make 7+Too many variables on this NU team to really predict in my opinion. Raiola looks great throwing the ball, but he is a true freshman. And if he gets injured look out. I doubt Kaelin is ready and HH is a joke. Not buying the hype that he has improved. Maybe he has, but how much? We have a veteran offensive line but they have not exactly been world beaters up to this point. Running back is a big question mark.
Defense is sketchy in secondary in terms of depth and they too must prove that they an get a stop late in games when it really matters, which is something they failed at last year.
We have a favorable schedule but so what? We struggled last year and lost to some very marginal teams. There is no guarantee that this will improve.
I am not drinking the kool aid this year. I am in a total prove it to me mode.
Don't trust the kicking game and QB is unproven. But there are a lot of pieces in place. This could be anything from Frost year 7 to a breakout year. Will be interesting to watch.Too many variables on this NU team to really predict in my opinion. Raiola looks great throwing the ball, but he is a true freshman. And if he gets injured look out. I doubt Kaelin is ready and HH is a joke. Not buying the hype that he has improved. Maybe he has, but how much? We have a veteran offensive line but they have not exactly been world beaters up to this point. Running back is a big question mark.
Defense is sketchy in secondary in terms of depth and they too must prove that they an get a stop late in games when it really matters, which is something they failed at last year.
We have a favorable schedule but so what? We struggled last year and lost to some very marginal teams. There is no guarantee that this will improve.
I am not drinking the kool aid this year. I am in a total prove it to me mode.
-24.5 right now I think. Maybe it was -28. I am not sure.We've been gifted a manageable schedule. Ohio St is the only game where we'll be big underdogs.
OSU is absolutely stacked this year.-24.5 right now I think. Maybe it was -28. I am not sure.
Yeah, that seems to be the case. I could imagine they steamroll over a lot of the teams on their schedule.OSU is absolutely stacked this year.
I on board with you on this one. There is just no way to know what we really have. Aside from "on paper" things look OK but not necessarily world beaters.Too many variables on this NU team to really predict in my opinion. Raiola looks great throwing the ball, but he is a true freshman. And if he gets injured look out. I doubt Kaelin is ready and HH is a joke. Not buying the hype that he has improved. Maybe he has, but how much? We have a veteran offensive line but they have not exactly been world beaters up to this point. Running back is a big question mark.
Defense is sketchy in secondary in terms of depth and they too must prove that they can get a stop late in games when it really matters, which is something they failed at last year.
We have a favorable schedule but so what? We struggled last year and lost to some very marginal teams. There is no guarantee that this will improve.
I am not drinking the kool aid this year. I am in a total prove it to me mode.
Live lines just popped up on my site @king_kong_ @PeliniTheCrutch
NU -27 vs UTEP. I grabbed it now.
I also like FSU -13.5 at GT and LSU - 6 vs USC
Also, Ohio State - 50! hosting Akron
This season kind of hinges on the Colorado game to some degree. We beat them and I think 8 wins is our basement. We lose and we are probably a 6-7 win team.
Right? It surly won't drop,-50 omg 😳 No way they keep that on the books through game day. Might as well take OSU rt now if you can I guess.
I like the Nebraska bet. I honestly don’t know much about the other ones…gotta wait until after I get my Phil Steele college preview magazine.Live lines just popped up on my site @king_kong_ @PeliniTheCrutch
NU -27 vs UTEP. I grabbed it now.
I also like FSU -13.5 at GT and LSU - 6 vs USC
Also, Ohio State - 50! hosting Akron
Beat CU and the Skers should start 7-0.This season kind of hinges on the Colorado game to some degree. We beat them and I think 8 wins is our basement. We lose and we are probably a 6-7 win team.
That is my summer reading book! HaI like the Nebraska bet. I honestly don’t know much about the other ones…gotta wait until after I get my Phil Steele college preview magazine.
If Rhule is the coach we think he is and Dylan Raiola actually throws TD passes
I know that Purdue fan will be here in 1.21 gigawatts to explain why 4.5 is way off and they will win 8 games but I thought I would still post this.
I’m not seeing where Nebraska 35% chance of winning against the Clarkeyes.. should be 50/50..If Rhule is the coach we think he is and Dylan Raiola actually throws TD passes
These "should" be our W's and Losses
W - UTEP - 90% chance @ a W
W - Colorado - 70% chance @ a W
W - UNI - 85% chance @ a W
W - Illinois - 65% chance @ a W
W - @Purdue - 60% chance @ a W
W - Rutgers - 70% chance @ a W
W - @Indiana - 60% chance @ a W
L - @Ohio State - 10% chance @ a W
W - UCLA - 65% chance @ a W
L - @USC - 25% chance @ a W
W - Wisconsin - 55% chance @ a W
L - @Iowa - 35% chance @ a W
If we still have turnoveritis and still don't know how to close out a game, we will again not make a bowl
35% seems about right for Wisconsin, thoughI’m not seeing where Nebraska 35% chance of winning against the Clarkeyes.. should be 50/50..
Ohio St for sure. I'm not sure our chance is that low on USC. They have to prove they can play D and also see what life is like without Caleb WIlliams. I will say if Dylan Riaola is who we think he is and we get a few things on D and get any RB play we are going to be a tough out for anyone outside of Ohio St. With that said, I think we could still put some pressure on them as I think Rhule makes these kids believe.If Rhule is the coach we think he is and Dylan Raiola actually throws TD passes
These "should" be our W's and Losses
W - UTEP - 90% chance @ a W
W - Colorado - 70% chance @ a W
W - UNI - 85% chance @ a W
W - Illinois - 65% chance @ a W
W - @Purdue - 60% chance @ a W
W - Rutgers - 70% chance @ a W
W - @Indiana - 60% chance @ a W
L - @Ohio State - 10% chance @ a W
W - UCLA - 65% chance @ a W
L - @USC - 25% chance @ a W
W - Wisconsin - 55% chance @ a W
L - @Iowa - 35% chance @ a W
If we still have turnoveritis and still don't know how to close out a game, we will again not make a bowl
I just think on the Las Vegas odds maker paper this is what it looks like with no history or bias... with that said I agree with youI’m not seeing where Nebraska 35% chance of winning against the Clarkeyes.. should be 50/50..
I think the talk about HH improving is coach speak for the press and a hope to keep him around due to a limited QB room. Hard to change a throwing style in a short amount of time.Too many variables on this NU team to really predict in my opinion. Raiola looks great throwing the ball, but he is a true freshman. And if he gets injured look out. I doubt Kaelin is ready and HH is a joke. Not buying the hype that he has improved. Maybe he has, but how much? We have a veteran offensive line but they have not exactly been world beaters up to this point. Running back is a big question mark.
Defense is sketchy in secondary in terms of depth and they too must prove that they can get a stop late in games when it really matters, which is something they failed at last year.
We have a favorable schedule but so what? We struggled last year and lost to some very marginal teams. There is no guarantee that this will improve.
I am not drinking the kool aid this year. I am in a total prove it to me mode.
HH wasn't too bad at first but after carrying the ball 15+ times a game a few times he didn't look the same. He was still better than Purdy when healthy though. I was remembering when Mickey put Purdy in against Indiana for a play when casey got hurt and he immediately fumbled it in the endzone for a td.I think the talk about HH improving is coach speak for the press and a hope to keep him around due to a limited QB room. Hard to change a throwing style in a short amount of time.
I am hopeful about the season but I havent had a sip of the kool aid in a long time.
Exactly. It is the same bullshit we heard every year about Eric Crouch and Taylor Martinez supposedly becoming much better passers in the offseason only to show up with the same throwing mechanics in the Fall. The difference with those two guys from HH is that they were much better runners than HH and were streaky as passers. Once in a while they would have a great game slinging the ball around. HH? He isn't even streaky. He was good for one long bomb a game to a wide open guy but not much else.I think the talk about HH improving is coach speak for the press and a hope to keep him around due to a limited QB room. Hard to change a throwing style in a short amount of time.
I am hopeful about the season but I havent had a sip of the kool aid in a long time.