But "run the ball" guy before overtime said to run it and "get 3 yards every play" in the game thread the othet night. Then immediately after he cries about running it the first 2 plays. All while claiming "why not run the zone read". When it was explained to him the 1st down play was (and confirmed yesterday by the coaches) not a damn peep.
Hey genius, did you firget about that,"3yard" detail? How many yards did we get on first and second down. Got it.
Newsflash: there is another option on the zone read besides the dive to the back! But it is apparent you have no idea what it is. And it has been laid out for you that we got your demanded 3 yards on average throughout the game.
Wrong, again. I stated that for overtime. 3 yards × 4 downs = first down. Did i do that right? Or is my math wrong, football god.
Is there!?!? I dont know!!!! Help me understand!!! Does he look at the end"zone" and "read" a book? That would be stupid, hes in the middle of a football match!
So because the same plays that worked all game (to meet your ignorant demand) were not executed, means you get to change your mind after, just because you don't like the result. Good gravy you are one "special" little flower.
I not know fute ball. Teach me how understand, me stoopid. You very smart. You and 463 very nice peoples. Mothers of yous must very proud of yous
There it is! Can't back up any of your drunken, kindergarten-level understanding of football.
Shouldn't you be at the bar scrawling down 8-man iso plays on a napkin?
One of the most substantive posts in the entire thread and not a single reply that I can find. Typical Husker Board pissing match....
Wisconsin put pressure on TA not only with their pass rush but by making him make decisions....not his strong suit I'm afraid.You shouldn't find it funny. It's more meant as pity toward the town drunk yelling at the TV during the game.
See... not so hard to post more along the lines of what you understand about the game. You could have done this sooner and saved yourself alot of embarrassment
Everyone understands that you're a blowhard who attacks and stalks posters, you even admit this (which is a clear violation of board rules) and the whole time you claim to be an x's and o's guru who superior to everyone on here yet ive seen you contribute nothing beforehand. Its ALL in hindsight and probably ripped off from sharpe n benning in the morning and probably arron semn. So how about you back up your supposed "genius" and explain to all us rubes exactly in detail what will and wont work offensively and defensively vs ohio state. When you make up an excuse and bring nothing of substance to the board, it will be proof of your BS. Ill have a box of tissues waiting for you. Im ready for you to deflect and respond with, "no, you do it first and then i will." Thats when i win and you can just be quiet for a while. Ill start the clock.......now
