You don’t know football. Your repetitive rationale for why Haarberg should be our QB now and forever is because “he’s a winner”.
You have no idea about the Xs and Os or personnel or stats or anything beyond the first layer so that’s why you cling so tight to your soundbite.
It’s not trolling. It’s just lack of understanding.
You’re the fan in the stands that is screaming “great play call” on a TD play that came from a C1 coverage, standard slant pass where the safety lost the ball in the air and the WR plucks it and goes for 6.
You are that guy high fiving everyone and telling everyone how great the throw was by the QB when a few others know that ball should have never been thrown.
Then the rest of the game you’re yelling “throw the deep slant! It works!”
And there is zero point for any of us to try to refute your point about “Haarberg is a winner.” Because at the end of the day you’re right - he won more games than the other QBs. We won’t ever win that argument. And when you can’t see past that and take a more detailed approach to the analysis, you won’t see anything more than the wins and losses. Thus your position.
“Throw the slant!” Is identical to “Haarberg is a winner”.
I totally get it.
You have no idea about the Xs and Os or personnel or stats or anything beyond the first layer so that’s why you cling so tight to your soundbite.
It’s not trolling. It’s just lack of understanding.
You’re the fan in the stands that is screaming “great play call” on a TD play that came from a C1 coverage, standard slant pass where the safety lost the ball in the air and the WR plucks it and goes for 6.
You are that guy high fiving everyone and telling everyone how great the throw was by the QB when a few others know that ball should have never been thrown.
Then the rest of the game you’re yelling “throw the deep slant! It works!”
And there is zero point for any of us to try to refute your point about “Haarberg is a winner.” Because at the end of the day you’re right - he won more games than the other QBs. We won’t ever win that argument. And when you can’t see past that and take a more detailed approach to the analysis, you won’t see anything more than the wins and losses. Thus your position.
“Throw the slant!” Is identical to “Haarberg is a winner”.
I totally get it.