ADVERTISEMENT

HC - Where are you currently at?

Who becomes coach

  • Mickey J

    Votes: 37 17.5%
  • B.O.B

    Votes: 20 9.4%
  • Dave Aranda

    Votes: 24 11.3%
  • Urban Meyer

    Votes: 15 7.1%
  • Lane Kiffen

    Votes: 27 12.7%
  • An Outside Coach no one is thinking about

    Votes: 41 19.3%
  • Klieman

    Votes: 25 11.8%
  • Lance Leipold

    Votes: 15 7.1%
  • Mike Gundy

    Votes: 4 1.9%
  • Kyle Whittingham

    Votes: 4 1.9%

  • Total voters
    212
The problem with the 80% approval rating is that 90% of the fanbase is indifferent anymore. Those of us that are outspoken on a message board or social media, make up a very small percentage of the actual fan base.

To get 80% approval, if what is reported or discussed is true, it will be the conservative hire that doesn't make waves or isn't outspoken on social media. Unfortunately, getting 80% approval from a fan base more concerned with "doing things right" vs winning will get us "doing things right" results.

I know I sound like a broken record, but Klieman or Leipold or Campbell will put an artificial ceiling on results. Those guys don't recruit at a high level, they are defined by coaching to not lose games rather than win. They will win a few games they aren't supposed to but by and large, they will lose to teams that out talent them. The bigger problem with hiring coaches like that is that the fan base that wanted them, will also want them fired when they don't get to and win conference championship games. We have a history of firing coaches (Solich and Pelini) who do exactly that.

At some point, someone in charge needs to set the expectation. Is it to win titles or is it to have a ceiling of 9-10 wins every once in a while.

The guy you want doesn't exist. There are only 5 or 6 coaches capable of winning at the BCS level. Sub one in and out every year.

Klieman and Leipold don't undervalue recruiting. You simply can't do it at Kansas or Kansas State. The schools, programs, resources and stadiums have a ceiling. Because of that, they focus on the areas of their program they can influence.

TCU and Baylor are basically the same as KU and KSU with one huge exception. Proximity to talent. That's why Aranda is fools gold. He can dominate at LSU with a roster full of studs. On his own, he's just pretty good, not elite.

I guarantee our fans would be pretty satisfied winning most home games and 9 or 10 every year with consistency. But we are so far away from winning even 7 or 8 per year. Our foundation is in total disarray. We are arguably at our lowest point over the last 25 years. As is, I find no reasons to be hopeful for the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: c3o and BleedRed78
TCU and Baylor are basically the same as KU and KSU with one huge exception. Proximity to talent. That's why Aranda is fools gold. He can dominate at LSU with a roster full of studs. On his own, he's just pretty good, not elite.
Not saying Aranda’s the answer, but his record as DC at Wisconsin and Utah State was impressive despite lack of recruiting honey hole.
 
It is very concerning to me that MJ has apparently given Whipple complete deference, when what Wipple has been doing this year really isn't working - bad Oline or not. Wipple's offense apparently worked last season at Pitt with a QB good enough to start in the NFL as a rookie (albeit not with a lot of success), but when else has it been successful? And how often will Nebraska have a QB who will start in the NFL - ever, let alone as a rookie? Yeah, we scored some points against mediocre/bad defenses - less than stellar secondaries. If MJ is truly HC material, he needed to have the nads to step in there by about mid-3rd quarter and say Wip, this clearly aint going to work, lets try something different. If they come out agianst MN with Purdy dropping back 35 times, I will be completely off the MJ train as HC. I'd still love him staying on as a wide receiver coach, but not HC.
I said it before, people looked at what Whipple did his last year at Pitt. But it takes time to develope your routine and get the staff and players on board with where you want to go. Frost and the media never allowed for that time. You had to expect more of what Whipple accomplished his first year at Pitt then his last. Unfortunately , he wasn’t able to account for this line play and the lack of an identity for this team in anyway shape or form. Regardless, I don’t expect he’ll be back next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: headcard
The guy you want doesn't exist. There are only 5 or 6 coaches capable of winning at the BCS level. Sub one in and out every year.

Klieman and Leipold don't undervalue recruiting. You simply can't do it at Kansas or Kansas State. The schools, programs, resources and stadiums have a ceiling. Because of that, they focus on the areas of their program they can influence.

TCU and Baylor are basically the same as KU and KSU with one huge exception. Proximity to talent. That's why Aranda is fools gold. He can dominate at LSU with a roster full of studs. On his own, he's just pretty good, not elite.

I guarantee our fans would be pretty satisfied winning most home games and 9 or 10 every year with consistency. But we are so far away from winning even 7 or 8 per year. Our foundation is in total disarray. We are arguably at our lowest point over the last 25 years. As is, I find no reasons to be hopeful for the future
Again, they will be satisfied until they aren't. Pelini and Solich are the proof that the luster wears off.

The guy I want does exist, it is a guy that is a grinder on the recruiting trail and will hit Texas, Florida, California and the SE hard.

I didn't say guys like Klieman and Leipold undervalue recruiting, I said they aren't good at it, they don't have the contacts needed. The recruit guys that are local, midlevel and try to elevate them through development. Those guys are like Ferentz and Chryst and Fleck etc.
 
Not saying Aranda’s the answer, but his record as DC at Wisconsin and Utah State was impressive despite lack of recruiting honey hole.
I don't disagree that he can coach some defense. I'm not sure he's elite as a head coach. Not even picking on him. There isn't a single coach that is not somewhat of a risk. None of us can predict the future. We shouldn't want short term, quick fix results (Mel Tucker😂)

Who REALLY wants and values this job? Who can build a winning culture? Who knows how to really game plan for an opponent?
 
Again, they will be satisfied until they aren't. Pelini and Solich are the proof that the luster wears off.

The guy I want does exist, it is a guy that is a grinder on the recruiting trail and will hit Texas, Florida, California and the SE hard.

I didn't say guys like Klieman and Leipold undervalue recruiting, I said they aren't good at it, they don't have the contacts needed. The recruit guys that are local, midlevel and try to elevate them through development. Those guys are like Ferentz and Chryst and Fleck etc.
z7xRO2K.gif
 
Riley had an 80% approval rating. It's not a high bar and pretty much a meaningless statement.
I don't know who exactly gave him that approval rating you're referring to. I can only speak for myself. I STRONGLY DISAPPROVED of him from the very first day Eichorst announced him as the surprise next coach. The reason was due to his historical winning track record, not good at all. It was clear from the very beginning that the only reason Eichorst ever hired him is because he knew he could control him.
 
Again, they will be satisfied until they aren't. Pelini and Solich are the proof that the luster wears off.

The guy I want does exist, it is a guy that is a grinder on the recruiting trail and will hit Texas, Florida, California and the SE hard.

I didn't say guys like Klieman and Leipold undervalue recruiting, I said they aren't good at it, they don't have the contacts needed. The recruit guys that are local, midlevel and try to elevate them through development. Those guys are like Ferentz and Chryst and Fleck etc.
There is a formula that works best for KState, but I think it is out of necessity. You hire some guys for their network, such as Mickey or Bill Busch. They have the frequent flier miles and years of building relationships. The head head guy is your closer, in his office, not on the road entirely. No disrespect to your opinion. I see it a little differently. I am looking for the leadership abilities of the head coach. The ability to build a program and foster a winning culture. It goes way beyond locker room speeches.
 
There is a formula that works best for KState, but I think it is out of necessity. You hire some guys for their network, such as Mickey or Bill Busch. They have the frequent flier miles and years of building relationships. The head head guy is your closer, in his office, not on the road entirely. No disrespect to your opinion. I see it a little differently. I am looking for the leadership abilities of the head coach. The ability to build a program and foster a winning culture. It goes way beyond locker room speeches.
Guys like Leipold and Klieman don't hire guys like Joseph or Busch. They hire guys just like themselves. They want players they can develop, and do things their way. They don't just change their M.O. because they get to a different school.

Almost every head coach that emphasizes recruiting was a stud recruiter as a position coach. They hire coaches that are just like them too.
 
Hiring a head coach is, unfortunately, a HUGE crapshoot. Success at one school definitely doesn't guarantee success at another. I may be wrong, but I think most if not all the "hot" coaches the year we hired Frost all failed at their next job.
 
I don't know who exactly gave him that approval rating you're referring to. I can only speak for myself. I STRONGLY DISAPPROVED of him from the very first day Eichorst announced him as the surprise next coach. The reason was due to his historical winning track record, not good at all. It was clear from the very beginning that the only reason Eichorst ever hired him is because he knew he could control him.
I agree, I felt the same way. But I was easily in the minority, especially on this board.
 
Guys like Leipold and Klieman don't hire guys like Joseph or Busch. They hire guys just like themselves. They want players they can develop, and do things their way. They don't just change their M.O. because they get to a different school.

Almost every head coach that emphasizes recruiting was a stud recruiter as a position coach. They hire coaches that are just like them too.
Read through their roster. It's littered with guys from Texas and Georgia with some Florida and California mixed in.

 
Doesn't the new contract Mickey signed guarantee he has a place on the staff if he doesn't get name HC?
It means he goes back to his old job but it doesn’t mean he keeps it. That’s up to the head coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Antwill
Read through their roster. It's littered with guys from Texas and Georgia with some Florida and California mixed in.

They have recruited 2 four star players, both QBs one from Kansas and one from Iowa. The rest of those guys littered from Texas or elsewhere are either unranked, 2 star or 3 star players. So once again, not exactly killing it on the recruiting trail.
 
They have recruited 2 four star players, both QBs one from Kansas and one from Iowa. The rest of those guys littered from Texas or elsewhere are either unranked, 2 star or 3 star players. So once again, not exactly killing it on the recruiting trail.
And we've got a bunch of four stars who would get their teeth kicked in by Kansas State. It seems your argument is that they don't want to have better recruits. Odd. Succeeding at a high level with two and three stars is pretty impressive.
 
I think Joseph has done an admirable job with the shitty hand he was dealt, but hasn't made a strong enough case for dropping the interim tag. If NU can pay Scott Frost $5 million a year to go away, it can surely attract someone with a more proven track record. From the list above, Klieman and Leipold are not my top choices but I think they are the most realistic.
This is it in a nutshell😒. MJ is not the answer - nothing in his background to suggest he can pull this off. And those who think that CK and LL are not good enough - LOL- rewatch last Saturday and readjust your expectations. The roster is a sad sack of average players who are lazy, scared, or confused. A top coach I don't think saw the makings of a turnaround crew on that field.
 
Agree on getting the most out of them. Klieman is about the right age. He's already done KState enough of a favor. Let's see if he is satisfied with a life of doing more with less. Sometimes it's nice to do more with more.
we are not going to get back to winning by playing finesse gay shit. go back to what works.
 
And we've got a bunch of four stars who would get their teeth kicked in by Kansas State. It seems your argument is that they don't want to have better recruits. Odd. Succeeding at a high level with two and three stars is pretty impressive.
So my point still stands. Well coached 4 stars will beat well coached 2 and 3 stars.

they may want better players but they don’t get them. That is because the emphasis is on development. That is the whole point. They don’t target the highly sought after players. It is like the lottery, you can’t win if you don’t play.

They have 2 losses and still have to play Baylor and Texas. They could end up 8-4 or worse. Let the season play out before announcing them a high level team.
 
I'm the one who wants Klinemen. I want power run
Hell yeah. He makes a lot of sense. I'm real big on the importance of fit and I think he would be a great fit on several levels.

Anyone know anything about his personality? We need somebody that's no nonsense and willing to clear out a lot of the riff raff. We've got too many posers glad handing off the name.
 
Hell yeah. He makes a lot of sense. I'm real big on the importance of fit and I think he would be a great fit on several levels.

Anyone know anything about his personality? We need somebody that's no nonsense and willing to clear out a lot of the riff raff. We've got too many posers glad handing off the name.
It all comes down to how much Gene Taylor wants him staying longer in Manhattan..

Klienman is going to be difficult getting hired at Nebraska because of this..
 
  • Sad
Reactions: BleedRed78
Hiring a head coach is, unfortunately, a HUGE crapshoot. Success at one school definitely doesn't guarantee success at another. I may be wrong, but I think most if not all the "hot" coaches the year we hired Frost all failed at their next job.
Well not Heupel. He had success almost immediately at UCF. I guess he wasn’t a hot name on many boards. What year was Kirby Smart hired? I remember at least one poster lobbying for him for NU at some point.
 
It is very concerning to me that MJ has apparently given Whipple complete deference, when what Wipple has been doing this year really isn't working - bad Oline or not. Wipple's offense apparently worked last season at Pitt with a QB good enough to start in the NFL as a rookie (albeit not with a lot of success), but when else has it been successful? And how often will Nebraska have a QB who will start in the NFL - ever, let alone as a rookie? Yeah, we scored some points against mediocre/bad defenses - less than stellar secondaries. If MJ is truly HC material, he needed to have the nads to step in there by about mid-3rd quarter and say Wip, this clearly aint going to work, lets try something different. If they come out agianst MN with Purdy dropping back 35 times, I will be completely off the MJ train as HC. I'd still love him staying on as a wide receiver coach, but not HC.
Completely agree.

If we don't have anyone who can pass, then you have to run the ball and figure out ways to do it.

MJ must get Whip on board with that kind of gameplan, to possibly finish out the rest of the year.
 
Well not Heupel. He had success almost immediately at UCF. I guess he wasn’t a hot name on many boards. What year was Kirby Smart hired? I remember at least one poster lobbying for him for NU at some point.
I remember that too about someone mentioning Kirby Smart, but he was looking for a quality SEC job..
 
They have recruited 2 four star players, both QBs one from Kansas and one from Iowa. The rest of those guys littered from Texas or elsewhere are either unranked, 2 star or 3 star players. So once again, not exactly killing it on the recruiting trail.
Obviously they’re developing guys and putting them in a position to be successful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT