Lmao, the guy is relentless isn't he...Top notch absurdist trolling red rover. Using a poorly understood Mars to disprove a much better understood Earth. Bravo!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lmao, the guy is relentless isn't he...Top notch absurdist trolling red rover. Using a poorly understood Mars to disprove a much better understood Earth. Bravo!
Real science takes years of unbiased collection of data and you let the data speak for itself. We can't even predict the weather out two weeks with any certainty. The earth is getting warmer but we don't know why. That's where the science goes out the window. Then we're left with filling the blanks with using the SWAG Method... Scientific Wild Ass Guess.
The stupidity is thick in this thread.
Rover, you are out of your depth. Simply because we cannot predict the weather with a high degree of certainty beyond a week or two does not logically lead to the conclusion that we cannot make meaningful predictions about climate.
However, I think your agenda is clear. It has nothing to do with science. You've made up your mind, and your mind is closed.
The science is fairly straightforward. CO2 is rising in the Earth's atmosphere. We know, with certainty, that this CO2 is due to human activities. The rising of CO2, along with other greenhouse gases, is altering the planet's energy balance. That, over time, has resulted in (and will continue to result in) a warmer planet.
The science behind this is relatively clear. And we ignore it at our own peril.
I believe i Climate Change. The world naturally goes through cycles of Warming and Cooling. How much man effects the changes is open to debate by scientists on both sides of the spectrum.The data shows that the Earth has clearly been warming up over the last century or so.
What is the cause of this?
I agree. But one side would want to live their life in peace and be good stewards of the Earth. The other side has confiscated billions and billions of dollars in their pursuit.I believe i Climate Change. The world naturally goes through cycles of Warming and Cooling. How much man effects the changes is open to debate by scientists on both sides of the spectrum.
Your multiple question-mark game is strong. I bet I know where that was taught, because you won't see that in Encyclopedia Brittanica.I'm just straight up impressed by the single minded pursuit of the man made global warming crowd. They literally have no shame and will throw tons of unsubstantiated data against the wall till something sticks. I was born in the 1970's and went to this movie called Earthquake. All the alarmists screamed how California was going to fall into the ocean. Did it happen???? But I thought we were at some grand tipping point for the San Andres Fault??? All the data of showed the stress was growing exponentially and doom was eminent. Numbers can be manipulated to show what you want even in the most basic of situations. Well, the planet isn't basic and the variables are numerous. Why is it we're always 20 years from certain doom if nothing is done right now????????? It's because in that time frame the con men can steal and not be held accountable when doomsday never comes. They just manufacturer another catastrophe and add another 15 years this time. The cycle will never end because social engineering is their endgame. How many billions has been taxed or seized all at the alter of these charlatans??? We're all going to die because of the Amazon being cut down. We're all going to die because the ice is melting. We're all going to die because of mmassive hurricanes. We're all going to die because of a certain ice age. We're all going to die because of a boiling earth. We're gonna take your money cause we're smarter then you and we care. And most importantly we know what's going to happen cause we have the data... right???
It's easier than typing WTF??? all the time.Your multiple question-mark game is strong. I bet I know where that was taught, because you won't see that in Encyclopedia Brittanica.
In all the history of these types of threads, has anyone ever had an opinion changed?