And what was Rhule's? I honestly have no idea. Maybe it was really good while at Temple and Baylor?
Dan Mullen to UNLV
- Thread starter phoenix4nu
- Start date
To keep up with titans like East Carolina and Tulsa? Not sure, don’t care either. Didn’t Scott Frost go undefeated in that conference too?
Glad you agree it’s factually correct!
Since I apparently have to spell it out to you.
No, that his argument of Mullen's success with the comment of "MSU was ranked #1" is stupid just like the "Riley got Nebraska ranked to #6" comment.
Of course you don't. It would put a huge hole in your argument when trying to compare the 2 in that 1 was much more successful than the other.
Mullen got hired for better jobs, but that means he’s actually worse than Rhule.
impressive logic, retard
You wouldn’t address it.
Glad you’ve admitted he did something Rhule never has or will do!
I guess if you want to use meaningless statistics when 1 guy has never stayed at a place longer than 4 years (because he kept moving up), then yup, you win. Congrats.
So UNLV is a better job than the Carolina Panthers, Baylor and Nebraska?
So I understand the logic, Temple to Baylor to NFL to Nebraska is a lesser path than Miss St to Florida to fired to TV analyst Lake Oconee Academy to UNLV?
To use the logic of many on this board when it came to the Butler hire, it appears he sucked as a head coach because no one wanted him to be their coach for 3 seasons. I guess except Lake Oconee Academy Titans
Y'all love to argue, but what's the point? We have Rhule, not Mullen, and the jury is still out as far as the success he will have here. Time will tell.
overall record
Baylor: 19-20
Panthers: 11-27
Nebraska: 11-13
stunning resume.
Maybe he did? It's unfortunate if he sucks but has a much better resume than our guy. hoping that changes soon!
You wrote Mullen got better jobs. He has had exactly 2, now 3 HC jobs. I am not sure anyone is going to agree that Florida to TV Analyst to high school consultant to UNLV is getting better jobs.
Mississippi State is a better job than Temple.
Florida is a better job than Baylor.
Mississippi State and Florida both got worse after Mullen left. Baylor won the conference after Rhule left, nobody cared what Temple did.
So is it the 11-27 at the Panthers or the 13-15 here that you’re expecting me to be impressed with?
You are confusing the issue. I am not asking anyone to be impressed with Rhule. You wrote that you thought Mullen should have been hired in 2022 at Nebraska. I just stated there is nothing in his record that shows he would do any better at Nebraska than Rhule is doing. Then you moved the goal posts to start an attack on Rhule's record in a vacuum. You want other people to take circumstances into account when you pose a discussion, but when they come back, you just want the numbers.
I liked Mullen's approach to offense. It is unique and he will run the ball if it's working.
I do believe his college resume is better than Rhule's. He's certainly won in tougher circumstances, AND, he's also been fired. What he did at MSU, in the SEC West is very commendable.
I think he would have found the B1G west much more comfortable than the SEC. His offense can be deadly if the QB is capable. I don't know if we had that QB or if they would have came.
I'm still of the opinion that if our coaching was running on all cylinders, we would have won 9-10 games this year relatively easily, looking back at our competition.
Yes, I'm biased somewhat. I am not a fan of Rhule so far and I'm hoping he can get assistants here to make his job look better.
I just would have rather had Mullen, and probably stated that sometime in the past.
I do believe his college resume is better than Rhule's. He's certainly won in tougher circumstances, AND, he's also been fired. What he did at MSU, in the SEC West is very commendable.
I think he would have found the B1G west much more comfortable than the SEC. His offense can be deadly if the QB is capable. I don't know if we had that QB or if they would have came.
I'm still of the opinion that if our coaching was running on all cylinders, we would have won 9-10 games this year relatively easily, looking back at our competition.
Yes, I'm biased somewhat. I am not a fan of Rhule so far and I'm hoping he can get assistants here to make his job look better.
I just would have rather had Mullen, and probably stated that sometime in the past.
This is exactly why you can't have a conversation with him. He just can't keep up.
So what's the threshold here... Only winning a SEC titlem Does winning any conference title count? If not, why not and which conferences count?
Is winning said conference title the only deciding factor on whether you're a better coach or not?
“Nothing in his record”
Maybe if you ignore his 10%+ better winning %, and over twice the bowl appearances, and competing in the toughest conference in CFB.
But surely you wouldn’t be that stupid.
Refusing to answer your stupid questions =/= can’t keep up.
You argue like a woman and refuse to answer questions head on, then get your cųnt all sandy when fed your own medicine.
So far we have:
> finishing in the top 15 doesn’t matter, cuz one time Mike Riley was in the top 10 at midseason
> overall winning record doesn’t matter, because …?
> AAC is tougher than the SEC
what other brainlet takes do you have?
Fickell won the AAC
You don’t seem to think that moves the needle much in his case
So why should it in Rhule’s? Especially considering they each inherited winning programs in doing so.
Similar threads
