ADVERTISEMENT

Dan Mullen to UNLV

Glad you agree it’s factually correct!
Since I apparently have to spell it out to you.

No, that his argument of Mullen's success with the comment of "MSU was ranked #1" is stupid just like the "Riley got Nebraska ranked to #6" comment.
 
Since I apparently have to spell it out to you.

No, that his argument of Mullen's success with the comment of "MSU was ranked #1" is stupid just like the "Riley got Nebraska ranked to #6" comment.
Did Mullen finish in the top 15 three years in a row?
 
Of course you don't. It would put a huge hole in your argument when trying to compare the 2 in that 1 was much more successful than the other.
Mullen got hired for better jobs, but that means he’s actually worse than Rhule.

impressive logic, retard
 
You wouldn’t address it.

Glad you’ve admitted he did something Rhule never has or will do!
I guess if you want to use meaningless statistics when 1 guy has never stayed at a place longer than 4 years (because he kept moving up), then yup, you win. Congrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedMyMind
Mullen got hired for better jobs, but that means he’s actually worse than Rhule.

impressive logic, retard
So UNLV is a better job than the Carolina Panthers, Baylor and Nebraska?

So I understand the logic, Temple to Baylor to NFL to Nebraska is a lesser path than Miss St to Florida to fired to TV analyst Lake Oconee Academy to UNLV?

To use the logic of many on this board when it came to the Butler hire, it appears he sucked as a head coach because no one wanted him to be their coach for 3 seasons. I guess except Lake Oconee Academy Titans
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerO
Rhule took over a 4 win team with Temple and didn’t have a winning season til year 3.

Mullen took over a 4 win team with Miss. St and won 9 games by year 2. In the SEC.

You are simply not a serious person if you think Rhule accomplished more.
Y'all love to argue, but what's the point? We have Rhule, not Mullen, and the jury is still out as far as the success he will have here. Time will tell.
 
So UNLV is a better job than the Carolina Panthers, Baylor and Nebraska?
overall record
Baylor: 19-20
Panthers: 11-27
Nebraska: 11-13

stunning resume.
To use the logic of many on this board when it came to the Butler hire, it appears he sucked as a head coach because no one wanted him to be their coach for 3 seasons. I guess except Lake Oconee Academy Titans
Maybe he did? It's unfortunate if he sucks but has a much better resume than our guy. hoping that changes soon!
 
overall record
Baylor: 19-20
Panthers: 11-27
Nebraska: 11-13

stunning resume.

Maybe he did? It's unfortunate if he sucks but has a much better resume than our guy. hoping that changes soon!
You wrote Mullen got better jobs. He has had exactly 2, now 3 HC jobs. I am not sure anyone is going to agree that Florida to TV Analyst to high school consultant to UNLV is getting better jobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerO
You wrote Mullen got better jobs. He has had exactly 2, now 3 HC jobs. I am not sure anyone is going to agree that Florida to TV Analyst to high school consultant to UNLV is getting better jobs.
Mississippi State is a better job than Temple.

Florida is a better job than Baylor.

Mississippi State and Florida both got worse after Mullen left. Baylor won the conference after Rhule left, nobody cared what Temple did.

So is it the 11-27 at the Panthers or the 13-15 here that you’re expecting me to be impressed with?
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldjar07
Mississippi State is a better job than Temple.

Florida is a better job than Baylor.

Mississippi State and Florida both got worse after Mullen left. Baylor won the conference after Rhule left, nobody cared what Temple did.

So is it the 11-27 at the Panthers or the 13-15 here that you’re expecting me to be impressed with?
You are confusing the issue. I am not asking anyone to be impressed with Rhule. You wrote that you thought Mullen should have been hired in 2022 at Nebraska. I just stated there is nothing in his record that shows he would do any better at Nebraska than Rhule is doing. Then you moved the goal posts to start an attack on Rhule's record in a vacuum. You want other people to take circumstances into account when you pose a discussion, but when they come back, you just want the numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerO
I liked Mullen's approach to offense. It is unique and he will run the ball if it's working.

I do believe his college resume is better than Rhule's. He's certainly won in tougher circumstances, AND, he's also been fired. What he did at MSU, in the SEC West is very commendable.

I think he would have found the B1G west much more comfortable than the SEC. His offense can be deadly if the QB is capable. I don't know if we had that QB or if they would have came.

I'm still of the opinion that if our coaching was running on all cylinders, we would have won 9-10 games this year relatively easily, looking back at our competition.

Yes, I'm biased somewhat. I am not a fan of Rhule so far and I'm hoping he can get assistants here to make his job look better.

I just would have rather had Mullen, and probably stated that sometime in the past.
 
Dan Mullen is one of the very best offensive minds in college football. I'd say comparable, if not better, than Dana. I mean, that's why I wanted him, either as HC or OC. It's a rare commodity, and likely the most valuable one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thall_
Mullen won an SEC title

Rhule’s never come close to anything like that
So what's the threshold here... Only winning a SEC titlem Does winning any conference title count? If not, why not and which conferences count?

Is winning said conference title the only deciding factor on whether you're a better coach or not?
 
You are confusing the issue. I am not asking anyone to be impressed with Rhule. You wrote that you thought Mullen should have been hired in 2022 at Nebraska. I just stated there is nothing in his record that shows he would do any better at Nebraska than Rhule is doing. Then you moved the goal posts to start an attack on Rhule's record in a vacuum. You want other people to take circumstances into account when you pose a discussion, but when they come back, you just want the numbers.
“Nothing in his record”

Maybe if you ignore his 10%+ better winning %, and over twice the bowl appearances, and competing in the toughest conference in CFB.

But surely you wouldn’t be that stupid.
 
This is exactly why you can't have a conversation with him. He just can't keep up.
Refusing to answer your stupid questions =/= can’t keep up.

You argue like a woman and refuse to answer questions head on, then get your cųnt all sandy when fed your own medicine.
 
So what's the threshold here... Only winning a SEC titlem Does winning any conference title count? If not, why not and which conferences count?

Is winning said conference title the only deciding factor on whether you're a better coach or not?
So far we have:

> finishing in the top 15 doesn’t matter, cuz one time Mike Riley was in the top 10 at midseason

> overall winning record doesn’t matter, because …?

> AAC is tougher than the SEC

what other brainlet takes do you have?
 
Refusing to answer your stupid questions =/= can’t keep up.

You argue like a woman and refuse to answer questions head on, then get your cųnt all sandy when fed your own medicine.
But you do answer them. Just stupidly.
 
So far we have:

> finishing in the top 15 doesn’t matter, cuz one time Mike Riley was in the top 10 at midseason

> overall winning record doesn’t matter, because …?

> AAC is tougher than the SEC

what other brainlet takes do you have?
Literally none of my takes. But keep going. You're coming off real smart.
 
So what's the threshold here... Only winning a SEC titlem Does winning any conference title count? If not, why not and which conferences count?

Is winning said conference title the only deciding factor on whether you're a better coach or not?
Fickell won the AAC (while going undefeated and making the 4-team playoff)

You don’t seem to think that moves the needle much in his case

So why should it in Rhule’s?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT