ADVERTISEMENT

Expectations

We should all agree the Univ. is paying coaches enough to set reasonable and proper expectations or goals.
The “Chasing 3” goal that Rhule set is nothing close. “We just need those 3 points to win those close games and turn this thing around. Just make one more play.”
Well what would 3 pts really look like?

2023-2024: We ranked 120th with 18 points per game.
Additional 3 pts per game = 21 which would have ranked 102nd last year.

2024-2025: We currently rank 95th in points per game with 24, exceeding Rhule/Satt’s expectation at +5 pts per game.
"Chasing 3" additional points now = 27 which would only rank us at 77th.

Sound familiar?
Satt's admission of no goal or awareness of the very basic measure yards per play left him “guessing” numbers that would rank similarly.
He and Rhule seem ok with the very low standard or expectation.

This is frankly infuriating. Having a proper goal isn't rocket science.
Why were we not “chasing 11” pts per game to get us at least into the top 50 of scoring offenses? Or just imagine “chasing 14” pts per game to get us around the top 25. But we were good with taking slow baby steps to only make one more play or “chase 3.”

I’d pair this with what we pay coaches, and how we’ve recruited athletes ranked collectively between 15th and 39th the last 5 years.
Yet our results that exceed the coach’s own goal ranks us in the 90’s.

B1G has tough defenses, I get it, but our schedule has not been a crazy guantlet so far. Top 20 type of athletes and well paid coaches should at least get us into the top 50 for results before we start making excuses.

GBR

Power rank our remaining schedule

We have: Northern Iowa, Illinois, Purdue, Rutgers, Indiana, Ohio State, UCLA, USC, Wisconsin, Iowa.

I'm thinking of it mostly from who's going to be the toughest win:

1. Ohio St
2. USC (Not sold on Moss, but they've got a ton of talent)
3. Rutgers (Schiano just is able to work magic with these guys)
4. Illinois (playing well so far)
5. Indiana (Colorado of the B1G this year)
6. Iowa (That defense)
7. Wisconsin (Just barely better than Purdue)
8. Purdue (Last three are pretty interchangeable)
9. UCLA
10. Northern Iowa

Basketball Breaking down Nebraska basketball's roster with season-opener in sight

With Nebraska's final preseason action this Sunday with an exhibition against Grand Valley State University, the season-opener against Texas Rio Grande Valley on Nov. 4 is within sight.

Here's a quick look at Fred Hoiberg's new-look roster:

Positives from today…..

In no particular order:

1. FG kicking. If I woke up tomorrow with my head sewn to the carpet, I wouldn't be more surprised than I am right now.

2. Defense, especially vs the run. The line realty did control the line of scrimmage.

3. Raiola’s legs. Definitely added an element to our offense we haven’t seen since Colorado. Hope he keeps it up (and doesn’t get hurt, of course)

All in all, much improved from last Saturday and hopefully a tone setting game for the rest of the season.

I know this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but...

It seems the officials this year, and to some degree, last couple of years, have interjected themselves into the games and are deciding the outcomes of the games. Last night I watched the officials give the shaft to VT by having to 2 TD's nullified, taken off the board that kept VT from winning. One on a bogus holding call, the second on overturning a TD catch. The officials in the Wash, Rutgers game made many calls favoring Rutgers and stopping Washington drives. I have lost count on how TD's have been called back this year on penalties everytime a team scores on a long play. If the favored team is behind the 8 Ball, the officials bail them out on a regular basis.

One last rant: When will college football and the NFL adopt the XFL's process for reviewing plays? The XFL had two LARGE screens, and officials reviewing every play live in a booth. If there was a problem, they would stop play, have the decision in about 15 seconds, and play would resume. It was interesting listening to the reviewers talk through the process and explain it to the field judge. The officials on the field DO NOT need to be behind the microscopic screen watching reviews (probably porn clips) taking 5-10 minutes to make an effin decision. The game flowed smoother and faster, if they needed more time to view a play they would stop play until a decision was made, but that happened rarely. The NCAA and NFL are prehistoric in making changes to improve the quality of play. Personally, I think instant replay needs to be removed unless a flag is thrown and then you have 45 seconds to decide the outcome. If it takes longer than that, the play stands.

I'm done for now, thanks.

So, what are your plans after halftime tomorrow?

I HOPE I'm watching the 2nd half but if the game gets way out of our grasp it's too painful for me to watch live.

I'll probably switch to watching another, hopefully more competitive, game and check in on the Huskers occasionally.

I have some leaf screens in my gutter that blew out during the last high wind we had in Lincoln. It's about time I fixed those.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT