ADVERTISEMENT

Rhule Aid Drinkers

Looking at Rhule's history he only stays at places for about three years and then leaves. He is on track to be fired here in three years as well. I wonder if it's because he always gets exposed by then.
I don’t think so…

A man is typically motivated by one of the following:
1. Legacy
2. Money

Osborne is classic legacy guy. He would of given the same effort if he was paid $1 or $10M.

Rhule seems to be motivated by money (nothing wrong with that). The problem with money guys is once they hit multi generational wealth they lose motivation and the hunger that got them there.

Worse mistake you can make with a money guy is guarantee 90% of his 8- year salary
  • Like
Reactions: SomedayHusker

Rhule Aid Drinkers

Yeah, well he also over-performed his year 1 numbers with us. So, I guess we have to take that into account. Maybe he just combined years 1 and 2 with us? Or maybe this whole 3 year formula thing is just a coincidence his last 2 stops and it doesn't mean a damn thing as it pertains to us.
Sad state of the Husker fan that thinks 5 wins is over performing.
  • Like
Reactions: Landomatic

Rhule Aid Drinkers

Recovering Rhule Aid Drinker here. I used to buy into the Rhule 3 year rule, but it’s obvious he no longer has that same hunger:

Temple Wins
Year 1 -2
Year 2 - 6
Year 3 - 10

Baylor Wins
Year 1 - 1
Year 2 - 7
Year 3 - 11

Rhule’s prior success stories included increasing 2nd year win totals by 200% (Temple) & 600% (Baylor). There was a clear improvement from year 1 to 2. He is already failing to accomplish this. Rhule must win 2 out of next 3 to keep this illusion of year 3 miracle alive.

Yeah, well he also over-performed his year 1 numbers with us. So, I guess we have to take that into account. Maybe he just combined years 1 and 2 with us? Or maybe this whole 3 year formula thing is just a coincidence his last 2 stops and it doesn't mean a damn thing as it pertains to us.
  • Like
Reactions: thall_

Rhule Aid Drinkers

Recovering Rhule Aid Drinker here. I used to buy into the Rhule 3 year rule, but it’s obvious he no longer has that same hunger:

Temple Wins
Year 1 -2
Year 2 - 6
Year 3 - 10

Baylor Wins
Year 1 - 1
Year 2 - 7
Year 3 - 11

Rhule’s prior success stories included increasing 2nd year win totals by 200% (Temple) & 600% (Baylor). There was a clear improvement from year 1 to 2. He is already failing to accomplish this. Rhule must win 2 out of next 3 to keep this illusion of year 3 miracle alive.

The Psychology

Beyond the question of how athletic or talented guys are, or how good the schemes are, the team plays like it's afraid to lose. So much of that is due to the constant mention of "years since blah blah blah". It affects every team. Georgia has a mental issue with Alabama. They come out looking out of sorts every time they play Alabama.

Best thing to do to get out of that issue is say eff it. We don't care about the bowl streak. Just focus on being better everywhere, all the time. And the fans and media need to stop wallowing in it. Stop talking curses or poo pooing over a coach that was fired and wasn't very good to begin with. The team absorbs all that.

Part of the reason for the comeback was the game felt lost and the team visibly relaxed. As the comeback narrowed to a possible win, they tensed up again. Missed extra point, etc.
Satterfield's play-calling, slow DBs, and Raiola missing wide open receivers matters. Those are fixable things. Nobody can go back and make the Frost years better. Forget they happened and focus entirely on this year, these games and not years past.

Get that psychological monkey off the back of the program. Indiana hasn't been good forever and I guarantee you their players feel completely unaffected by what happened before they arrived.

Yeah, all true. But I think the issue everyone has is that the multi million dollar head coach should be able to fix that psychology. Can't expect the fans and media to be responsible for that. High expectations from fans and media are just a part of big boy, P2 conference, blue blood football. Those pressure cooker situations exist at every big time football program school. In many cases, worse than NU. If anything, our media is too soft and our fans have been too patient and supportive.

BTW, I'd give just about anything to have our one weak point be that we psych ourselves out when we play Alabama.

Who Should We Have Hired?

So now that we're almost 2 years in and with all the "fire everyone" talk, hindsight being 20/20, who should we have hired? I included what I remember to be the realistic, most thrown around names. Assuming we weren't getting Saban, Urban, the ghost of Bob Devaney, etc. And guys like Cignetti weren't on anyone's
I follow KU and Leipold closely. They are the most snakebite team in the country. They’ve had the lead late in the 4th quarter in every game and have been bitten by turnovers. They held Jalon Daniel’s out of spring and fall camp (contact) and he came back with 6 inches of rust. Took him several games to shake that off and it killed them. It’s also taken half a season to get used to a new OC. Still believe he is a very good (old school) coach. He can be a little prickly with media/fans (not in a Pelion way). That might be welcome here. 😂
KU had a tough schedule to start off with. Never schedule a P5 program game one unless you are a perennial power. Lose that first game and you are going to be starting from behind.

Who Should We Have Hired?

He never explicitly said so, but he was definitely interested. Give the man his bag!

No more budget hires and budget measures!

Yeah, I'm right there with you on Urban. If Trev didn't throw everything at him to get him and he still turned us down, then he effed up big time. I'm 100% sure there was interest. I guess we'll never know why it didn't happen. I have my suspicions it was more about morals than budget though.
  • Like
Reactions: F--IT

The Psychology

Beyond the question of how athletic or talented guys are, or how good the schemes are, the team plays like it's afraid to lose. So much of that is due to the constant mention of "years since blah blah blah". It affects every team. Georgia has a mental issue with Alabama. They come out looking out of sorts every time they play Alabama.

Best thing to do to get out of that issue is say eff it. We don't care about the bowl streak. Just focus on being better everywhere, all the time. And the fans and media need to stop wallowing in it. Stop talking curses or poo pooing over a coach that was fired and wasn't very good to begin with. The team absorbs all that.

Part of the reason for the comeback was the game felt lost and the team visibly relaxed. As the comeback narrowed to a possible win, they tensed up again. Missed extra point, etc.
Satterfield's play-calling, slow DBs, and Raiola missing wide open receivers matters. Those are fixable things. Nobody can go back and make the Frost years better. Forget they happened and focus entirely on this year, these games and not years past.

Get that psychological monkey off the back of the program. Indiana hasn't been good forever and I guarantee you their players feel completely unaffected by what happened before they arrived.

The next OC

Getting Dirk Koetter and Jeanty would be an alpha dog move. Give koetter 2.5 million a year and Jeanty a million+. (or whatever it takes) That’s the stuff dreams are made of…
Jeantty will be the first running back taken in the draft. I checked on that after posting. Assumed he'd be among the top five (which at RB can mean as low as third round). Bottom line though, he's gone though.
Boise State has a lot of tough, winner players I'd love to have though. Hiring Koetter could still help with that.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT