ADVERTISEMENT

Washington due in court in about an 75 minutes.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh man all these holier than though types on here - I hope you are not caught doing something one day you should not but chances are you will. This kid is 19 years old now people are saying he has gotten off with wrist slaps his entire life - yep he deserved the book thrown at him when he pooped his diapers. A crime should fit the punishment as unfortunately our legal system is about punishment only. How was this girl harmed by receiving a video she had already seen before. Did Washington film - No - did he use to send to his friends and her friends - not what is being claimed. He sent it to her now she wants blood when many would have just told him to F off - I fail to see how this kid has harmed her for life as many are claiming he should be harmed
...Again, people are forgetting that this video had led to legal issues before, authorities knew about it, yet he chose to keep it for over a year and then send it back as revenge. (If true)

This isn't some kid who got consensual boob pics from his gf and didn't know it was wrong, but a lot of you are treating it as such.

A lot are also pretending that some people want him burnt at the steak, which is not true. But this deserves more than, ho hum he was young whatever no big deal. There is a middle ground.
 
I wonder if this all doesn't have an effect on the kids confidence, assuming he gets to play again, be it here or somewhere else.

There is a part of me that thinks it's possible he may never reach his potential during this football window/time of his life if it affects his game mentally.

That would be sad, but it makes me wonder..

I guess there is voice telling me that it's possible this kid just fizzles out. I don't wish that for him either, just a gut feeling it's possible.
 
“I don't like your opinion, so take a break from the computer.”

And again some of you guys are moving goal posts, its gone from “no big deal” to “shouldn't be a lifelong sex offender.”
Never said it had to do with opinion. Many of his points I actually agree with. It is the constants arguing with every person on here. Its ok and great to have an opinion and have conversation. When it is nothing more than arguing relentless with anyone and everyone is when it goes over the line and becomes annoying. He is free to do it. I am free to point it out. But as Tuco said, that is what ignore is for.
 
The only time I appeared before a judge for my stupidity I got no lawyer and faced up to my crime.

However, I am not saying that everyone should waive their right to an attorney. That is getting off the topic of wether or not someone should be charged with possession of child porn IF they are found guilty.

Now phones are easy peasy to track and retrieve information sent and received on them. So I hope MW has some good reason why he had child porn sent from his phone.

Right now he is innocent until proven guilty. But if they got it off his device, that would be very hard to esplain away...

So you knew you were guilty?
 
I wonder if this all doesn't have an effect on the kids confidence, assuming he gets to play again, be it here or somewhere else.

There is a part of me that thinks it's possible he may never reach his potential during this football window/time of his life if it affects his game mentally.

That would be sad, but it makes me wonder..

I guess there is voice telling me that it's possible this kid just fizzles out. I don't wish that for him either, just a gut feeling it's possible.
My personal opinion of Mo is that he doesn't finish his career at NU, even if he survives this case.

I hope he stays and becomes an All American, finishes his career and we all look back at this as a blip.

But if I had to bet on it, I would say he wont finish here.
Either way thats just a prediction and isn't really about this case.
 
Never said it had to do with opinion. Many of his points I actually agree with. It is the constants arguing with every person on here. Its ok and great to have an opinion and have conversation. When it is nothing more than arguing relentless with anyone and everyone is when it goes over the line and becomes annoying. He is free to do it. I am free to point it out. But as Tuco said, that is what ignore is for.
You have to understand Tuco...he’s not really a Husker fan as much as a Husker follower. He spends most of his time in the negative threads and seems to enjoy any negative drama/press/recruiting that happens to NU or HCSF. He also seems to hate Husker fans in general, while not hating the team per se. He is unapologetic about all of this, its just who he is and what he does.

Having said that, he’s mostly right here in regards to the seriousness of the allegations and that it is a big deal. He’s not going to be friendly about it because quite frankly there are some preposterous takes in this discussion. He's also probably correct that some on here are compromised by the fact that Mo is a big time football player on our team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: husker2612
At the rate you are going you will have nobody left to talk/ argue with but yourself. Maybe that is your goal.

And still you respond. Weird isn’t it? You complain about my posts, so I invite you to not respond, not read and even to put me on ignore. But you just can’t help yourself.


Ps. Last word
 
  • Like
Reactions: Top_Gun_
And still you respond. Weird isn’t it? You complain about my posts, so I invite you to not respond, not read and even to put me on ignore. But you just can’t help yourself.


Ps. Last word

imagine not responding to someone because of differing opinions

couldn't be me
 
You have to understand Tuco...he’s not really a Husker fan as much as a Husker follower. He spends most of his time in the negative threads and seems to enjoy any negative drama/press/recruiting that happens to NU or HCSF. He also seems to hate Husker fans in general, while not hating the team per se. He is unapologetic about all of this, its just who he is and what he does.

Having said that, he’s mostly right here in regards to the seriousness of the allegations and that it is a big deal. He’s not going to be friendly about it because quite frankly there are some preposterous takes in this discussion. He's also probably correct that some on here are compromised by the fact that Mo is a big time football player on our team.
Ok, that makes more sense. Didn't realize he wasn't a fan. Just thought he was an A hole who loved to argue for whatever reason. lol
 
Ok, that makes more sense. Didn't realize he wasn't a fan. Just thought he was an A hole who loved to argue for whatever reason. lol
Not a fan per se as we traditionally are. More of a follower with an interest. At least based on his posting history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: husker2612
You have to understand Tuco...he’s not really a Husker fan as much as a Husker follower. He spends most of his time in the negative threads and seems to enjoy any negative drama/press/recruiting that happens to NU or HCSF. He also seems to hate Husker fans in general, while not hating the team per se. He is unapologetic about all of this, its just who he is and what he does.

Having said that, he’s mostly right here in regards to the seriousness of the allegations and that it is a big deal. He’s not going to be friendly about it because quite frankly there are some preposterous takes in this discussion. He's also probably correct that some on here are compromised by the fact that Mo is a big time football player on our team.


First paragraph is partially false. I have been and continue to be a Husker football fan for 50 years.

With that said I do like to challenge people to defend their posts, especially when they are factually wrong. Regardless of topic.

Second paragraph 100% correct
 
You have to understand Tuco...he’s not really a Husker fan as much as a Husker follower. He spends most of his time in the negative threads and seems to enjoy any negative drama/press/recruiting that happens to NU or HCSF. He also seems to hate Husker fans in general, while not hating the team per se. He is unapologetic about all of this, its just who he is and what he does.

Having said that, he’s mostly right here in regards to the seriousness of the allegations and that it is a big deal. He’s not going to be friendly about it because quite frankly there are some preposterous takes in this discussion. He's also probably correct that some on here are compromised by the fact that Mo is a big time football player on our team.

Since we’re doing a bio on Tuco, you should probably include that he prefers to be called Taco.
 
First paragraph is partially false. I have been and continue to be a Husker football fan for 50 years.

With that said I do like to challenge people to defend their posts, especially when they are factually wrong. Regardless of topic.

Second paragraph 100% correct

serious question for all:

why can't R Johnson or another newcomer replace Mo? we're talking about a guy who tallied 670 total yds and 4 tds, was a 3-star

this is a can't-lose player?
 
serious question for all:

why can't R Johnson or another newcomer replace Mo? we're talking about a guy who tallied 670 total yds and 4 tds, was a 3-star

this is a can't-lose player?

He is one of the more explosive players we have on the team, period. Losing him would hurt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Top_Gun_
serious question for all:

why can't R Johnson or another newcomer replace Mo? we're talking about a guy who tallied 670 total yds and 4 tds, was a 3-star

this is a can't-lose player?
That has nothing to do with legal issues.

Mo is dang good.

But we have players for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Top_Gun_
That has nothing to do with legal issues.

Mo is dang good.

But we have players for sure.

he is, but I think all of us expect Mills to take the Ozigbo lead back role & even anticipate Wan'dale to have a bigger impact on the offense this season

he's a nice-to-have for sure but far from a have-to-have should the legal issue escalate, IMO
 
So you knew you were guilty?

Yep, I was 14 and knew what I was doing illegally was wrong. I plead guilty with no contest and got the penalty I was given.

Having said that, ignorance is not an excuse from the law for a good reason. You cannot prove or disprove ignorance except in the case of an infant. So that defense is one anyone could make and if it were admissable, all us nasty boys could get off on an ignorance plea.
 
serious question for all:

why can't R Johnson or another newcomer replace Mo? we're talking about a guy who tallied 670 total yds and 4 tds, was a 3-star

this is a can't-lose player?

Washington can be a special player and create mismatches this season that most of the newcomers may not be able to because of experience.

On the flip side, the fact that Washington has missed at least portions of the spring and the summer to deal with legal issues opens the door for one or more of the newcomers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Top_Gun_
Hell yes this is about football. It’s about your perspective and what side of the case you fall. If the female in this case was, heaven forbid, your daughter or niece, your friend’s daughter or niece or one of the football coach’s daughters or nieces, there would be very very few people who would be saying that we need to give the male the benefit of the doubt, that is was just some youthful indiscretion blah blah blah.

They were both in high school. Not pedophilia. He didn't record the sex. He had possession of said video and sent it back to her when she tried to reconnect. Inappropriate and immature, but it shouldn't ruin his life.
 
They were both in high school. Not pedophilia. He didn't record the sex. He had possession of said video and sent it back to her when she tried to reconnect. Inappropriate and immature, but it shouldn't ruin his life.

Sigh. He kept the video after he was told to delete it. He sent it to her when he was 18 years old. There is no exclusion clause in the majority age section that says if you’re in high school you are really not of majority age. The fact that he kept the video for more than two years and used it as a “weapon“ could lead some to believe that it was premeditated. The fact that he kept a video of a girl and two of his friends having sex seems weird to me. If it were me having sex with her or if it was her doing something alone that is something completely different. But again defend him to your fullest. I’m going to take a hard pass.

Edit - he wasn’t charged with being a pedophile.
 
Last edited:
Yep, it’s me prolonging this thread and arguing just to argue. Ha ha ha maybe people should read the whole thread before responding. Many of their points would have been addressed previously and wouldn’t need to be addressed again.
 
Wait...do some of you actually delete sex videos and naked pictures that you get? I not only save them, I back them up. I have even taken pictures OF pictures from my old phones so that I have them on my new phone in case they don't port over.

I have printed a few off and placed them in my safe deposit box.
 
Wait...do some of you actually delete sex videos and naked pictures that you get? I not only save them, I back them up. I have even taken pictures OF pictures from my old phones so that I have them on my new phone in case they don't port over.

I have printed a few off and placed them in my safe deposit box.

Great plan. Then when you die and your people come in to do an inventory of the SDB, the pictures can be passed down to your heirs with minimal bickering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EATAFAT1
Wait...do some of you actually delete sex videos and naked pictures that you get? I not only save them, I back them up. I have even taken pictures OF pictures from my old phones so that I have them on my new phone in case they don't port over.

I have printed a few off and placed them in my safe deposit box.
That's funny and true. Let's just say I hope the wife never cracks the vaulty code on my phone. A few of my former conquests still on there.Eek
 
Sigh. He kept the video after he was told to delete it. He sent it to her when he was 18 years old. There is no exclusion clause in the majority age section that says if you’re in high school you are really not of majority age. The fact that he kept the video for more than two years and used it as a “weapon“ could lead some to believe that it was premeditated. The fact that he kept a video of a girl and two of his friends having sex seems weird to me. If it were me having sex with her or if it was her doing something alone that is something completely different. But again defend him to your fullest. I’m going to take a hard pass.

Edit - he wasn’t charged with being a pedophile.

He dated this girl as a freshman in high school, left that school and went to a different school, then went to a different state and two more different high schools and yet, he held onto this video that he was told to delete, and then sent it to her when she contacted him. That is pretty petty on his part
 
He dated this girl as a freshman in high school, left that school and went to a different school, then went to a different state and two more different high schools and yet, he held onto this video that he was told to delete, and then sent it to her when she contacted him. That is pretty petty on his part

Nah. High school Tom Foolery, you’re just looking for a way to make it criminal and weird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buckman01213
He dated this girl as a freshman in high school, left that school and went to a different school, then went to a different state and two more different high schools and yet, he held onto this video that he was told to delete, and then sent it to her when she contacted him. That is pretty petty on his part

Hopefully it turns out to be not true and just an accusation with no actual evidence and not only do we not have a sex criminal on the team, but a fine young man targeted wrongly for a heinous crime, exonerated, and we can see him kick some butt on the field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tuco Salamanca
Sigh. He kept the video after he was told to delete it. He sent it to her when he was 18 years old. There is no exclusion clause in the majority age section that says if you’re in high school you are really not of majority age. The fact that he kept the video for more than two years and used it as a “weapon“ could lead some to believe that it was premeditated. The fact that he kept a video of a girl and two of his friends having sex seems weird to me. If it were me having sex with her or if it was her doing something alone that is something completely different. But again defend him to your fullest. I’m going to take a hard pass.

Edit - he wasn’t charged with being a pedophile.
In the spirit and hierarchy of reasons this is a law, I have to believe Mo's particular case and situation isn't what lawmakers had in mind for getting sick, dangerous sex offenders off the streets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: husker2612
In the spirit and hierarchy of reasons this is a law, I have to believe Mo's particular case and situation isn't what lawmakers had in mind for getting sick, dangerous sex offenders off the streets.


When did this revenge porn law go into effect in California? Who were the lawmakers looking to get off the streets when they passed that law?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT