ADVERTISEMENT

Washington due in court in about an 75 minutes.

Status
Not open for further replies.
When did this revenge porn law go into effect in California? Who were the lawmakers looking to get off the streets when they passed that law?
As far as i know, he didnt distribute the video to anyone else except her. You think her emotional distress is equal to someone who has had private video, pictures, etc distributed all over the internet? I'll go with what the Santa Clara County's supervising deputy district attorney for sexual assault stated
“It doesn’t have to be posted on Facebook or sent to the National Inquirer,” Hamilton said. “It’s a lot worse if you put it out there.”

Hamilton said Washinton’s charges are common and believed they likely only made national headlines because of Washington’s connection to the Huskers.

IMO he gets some type of probation, if guilty
 
As far as i know, he didnt distribute the video to anyone else except her. You think her emotional distress is equal to someone who has had private video, pictures, etc distributed all over the internet? I'll go with what the Santa Clara County's supervising deputy district attorney for sexual assault stated
“It doesn’t have to be posted on Facebook or sent to the National Inquirer,” Hamilton said. “It’s a lot worse if you put it out there.”

Hamilton said Washinton’s charges are common and believed they likely only made national headlines because of Washington’s connection to the Huskers.

IMO he gets some type of probation, if guilty

Of revenge porn?

Although the distribution aspect of the law doesn’t say it has to be sent someone else other than those in the video, it just has to be distributed without permission.

As far as level of emotional distress, again I don’t think the law stipulates that emotional stress has levels.

You are taking one line from the DAs office about posting it on Facebook or giving it to the tabloids. Hamilton is saying it is worse to mass distribute it to the general public or selling it to a tabloid but doesn’t say that sending it back to the girl wasn’t a violation of the law.
 
Last edited:
I’ve just read the first page so it may have been mentioned but I feel they let him play until it is settled. If they suspend him before it is that is saying you believe him to be guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC_'sker
Of revenge porn?

Although the distribution aspect of the law doesn’t say it has to be sent someone else other than those in the video, it just has to be distributed without permission.

As far as level of emotional distress, again I don’t think the law stipulates that emotional stress has levels.

You are taking one line from the DAs office about posting it on Facebook or giving it to the tabloids. Hamilton is saying it is worse to mass distribute it to the general public or selling it to a tabloid but doesn’t say that sending it back to the girl wasn’t a violation of the law.

Why don't we let it play out. You can yell at the weeds growing in your lawn in the meantime. I think the girl was a bit of a tramp. Gasp... Chew on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shizzle06
What? How is that not a horrific thing to do? She obviously had a really bad ordeal with all of it and in case you missed it the alleged incident is tha5 it was sent with malicious intent and he called her a hoe. Maybe he didn't, but if he did then I wouldn't say sending a video of her making what was probably the biggest mistake of her life, and one in which she said she was coerced into performing sex acts and then having the whole school watch to remind her of it is “not exactly a horrific thing to do”.
Horrific? She was getting tag teamed because she likes it like that. I bet it didn’t become horrific until her parents found out.
 
Personally I wouldn't care if this was a Hawkeye player. I do some prison ministry with a local group and the idea that this kid would be labled as a sex offender is mind blowing to me. It really destroys their life and for what he allegedly did, I just think it would be cruel and unusual punishment.
I agree!
 
Why don't we let it play out. You can yell at the weeds growing in your lawn in the meantime. I think the girl was a bit of a tramp. Gasp... Chew on that.
Ok. What about the fact that if he did this...this video had already caused legal issues, was known by authorities, and he was told to delete it.

Does that matter at all?
 
I wonder if Washington and the female in question were dating when she acquiesced to an orgy? Geez, I don't know. Do you? Nobody was arrested. Seems consensual.

Why did she get back in touch with him ? My wife bangs another guy and then feels bad? **** that ho.
 
I wonder if Washington and the female in question were dating when she acquiesced to an orgy? Geez, I don't know. Do you? Nobody was arrested. Seems consensual.

Why did she get back in touch with him ? My wife bangs another guy and then feels bad? **** that ho.
Youre being emotional and still ignoring what I pointed out above. Known video, authorities already gave all the kids who had it a chance to delete it, told to delete, kept it, sent it over a year later.

This is the tough part if he in fact did this. Who cares how she feels about it and that shes a hoe. That doesn't matter. I don't think they get graphs out in trial cases of how much a girl was a hoe 3 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sinomatic
Youre being emotional and still ignoring what I pointed out above. Known video, authorities already gave all the kids who had it a chance to delete it, told to delete, kept it, sent it over a year later.

This is the tough part if he in fact did this. Who cares how she feels about it and that shes a hoe. That doesn't matter. I don't think they get graphs out in trial cases of how much a girl was a hoe 3 years ago.

I am not being emotional. I'm being realistic. How would a teenager feel about his girlfriend banging a gang of dudes? Let's start with that. Its logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC_'sker
Youre being emotional and still ignoring what I pointed out above. Known video, authorities already gave all the kids who had it a chance to delete it, told to delete, kept it, sent it over a year later.

This is the tough part if he in fact did this. Who cares how she feels about it and that shes a hoe. That doesn't matter. I don't think they get graphs out in trial cases of how much a girl was a hoe 3 years ago.

How would you feel ? You hang em' high folks should leave it to the shitty justice he will receive in California. And wait on the verdict. Tuco... Tuco.... I hope your apple sauce is to your liking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC_'sker
I am not being emotional. I'm being realistic. How would a teenager feel about his girlfriend banging a gang of dudes? Let's start with that. Its logic.
Really not good about it. That doesn't really matter in the case.
 
How would you feel ? You hang em' high folks should leave it to the shitty justice he will receive in California. And wait on the verdict. Tuco... Tuco.... I hope your apple sauce is to your liking.
Neither I nor tuco want to hang him high. You're putting words in our mouths as a defense mechanism because you know you're wrong. And you are angry, calm down.
 
If it goes to a jury, I think common sense will win out, even in California. Mo will play for the Huskers again.
 
If it goes to a jury, I think common sense will win out, even in California. Mo will play for the Huskers again.
If he is found not guilty it will be because he didn't do what was alleged, which is possible as he has to be proven guilty.
It wont be because “ah yeah he did it but wouldn't you be angry and hold onto that banned video two years after the fact?”

Expect plea deal, prosecution is dragging it out on purpose.
 
You need a kleenex? Laughing

You are a rubberband. I've read your posts and Tucos, but you you evaluated it all without questioning the motives. And from what I understand this is mostly driven from the step mom. I'm not gonna sugar coat it. Defendant was blowing multiple dudes on video. She had sex with them and was ok with being videotaped and is of a similar age with Maurice.

She initiates contact with him. He calls her a ho and sends the video. At the time of the recording they were of a similar age. After he sent it I believe they are both of consenting age. I think the daughter is a slut, but that doesn't play well. Step mom is pushing it and dad is silent.
 
You are a rubberband. I've read your posts and Tucos, but you you evaluated it all without questioning the motives. And from what I understand this is mostly driven from the step mom. I'm not gonna sugar coat it. Defendant was blowing multiple dudes on video. She had sex with them and was ok with being videotaped and is of a similar age with Maurice.

She initiates contact with him. He calls her a ho and sends the video. At the time of the recording they were of a similar age. After he sent it I believe they are both of consenting age. I think the daughter is a slut, but that doesn't play well. Step mom is pushing it and dad is silent.
How do you know all of that?
 
If he is found not guilty it will be because he didn't do what was alleged, which is possible as he has to be proven guilty.
It wont be because “ah yeah he did it but wouldn't you be angry and hold onto that banned video two years after the fact?”

Expect plea deal, prosecution is dragging it out on purpose.

Shut up
 
You are a rubberband. I've read your posts and Tucos, but you you evaluated it all without questioning the motives. And from what I understand this is mostly driven from the step mom. I'm not gonna sugar coat it. Defendant was blowing multiple dudes on video. She had sex with them and was ok with being videotaped and is of a similar age with Maurice.

She initiates contact with him. He calls her a ho and sends the video. At the time of the recording they were of a similar age. After he sent it I believe they are both of consenting age. I think the daughter is a slut, but that doesn't play well. Step mom is pushing it and dad is silent.

You run with that defense in a case of proven child pornography...such as a 15 year old girl nude on video sent from your phone, much less involved in blowing, and you might "hang high".

If I'm a prosecutor I'm not going for the manufacturing of porn at the age of 15....only an idiot would think that is the issue. I'm going for possession of child pornography at the age of 18...the age of accountability in the United States.

Gosh I hope you don't become a lawyer. Stick to the internet gorilla thing, it suits you better. I laugh sometimes. You're a funny guy Tommy.
 
You run with that defense in a case of proven child pornography...such as a 15 year old girl nude on video sent from your phone, much less involved in blowing, and you might "hang high".

If I'm a prosecutor I'm not going for the manufacturing of porn at the age of 15....only an idiot would think that is the issue. I'm going for possession of child pornography at the age of 18...the age of accountability in the United States.

Gosh I hope you don't become a lawyer. Stick to the internet gorilla thing, it suits you better. I laugh sometimes. You're a funny guy Tommy.

You always attack the accusers character. Especially in a case like this. Why would you call a black man a gorilla ?
 
You run with that defense in a case of proven child pornography...such as a 15 year old girl nude on video sent from your phone, much less involved in blowing, and you might "hang high".

If I'm a prosecutor I'm not going for the manufacturing of porn at the age of 15....only an idiot would think that is the issue. I'm going for possession of child pornography at the age of 18...the age of accountability in the United States.

Gosh I hope you don't become a lawyer. Stick to the internet gorilla thing, it suits you better. I laugh sometimes. You're a funny guy Tommy.
You've got a heart that is black as night RS.

I am a far better man than your old ass ever thought of being. I am not a black man. You hateful candyass.
 
I am a far better man than your old ass ever thought of being. I am not a black man. You hateful candyass.

I wasn't talking about race homes. Lol goodnight. Try not to drink anymore than me, remember, you're better than me.
 
The Gilroy shooter was blown away and there was apparently no one else involved. If he had lived and/or if there had been more people involved, the Santa Clara County DA would have had bigger fish to fry than Maurice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC_'sker
My God, every time something is updated on Maurice Washington it’s got to turn into a 4-7 page ordeal. This will get pled down and he will end up with probation. The goodie goods in this thread seem to think he’s going to get charged with the charges he faces now. For one, it took them almost a year (or was it a year or longer before he got charged)...this says a lot. It shows they had to dig and pry to find anything on him. No DA waits that long to bring up charges. This means the case is weak. With that said, the DA is going to be desperate to charge him with something. So more then likely it will get dropped to “phone harassment” which is a misdemeanor and will allow him to get probation and charged with something. Trust me, Washington WILL NOT get charged with revenge porn, Will NOT happen. They always, ALWAYS lower it one charge in exchange for a plea of guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SC_'sker
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT