Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As far as i know, he didnt distribute the video to anyone else except her. You think her emotional distress is equal to someone who has had private video, pictures, etc distributed all over the internet? I'll go with what the Santa Clara County's supervising deputy district attorney for sexual assault statedWhen did this revenge porn law go into effect in California? Who were the lawmakers looking to get off the streets when they passed that law?
I used black and white to capture the moment!
As far as i know, he didnt distribute the video to anyone else except her. You think her emotional distress is equal to someone who has had private video, pictures, etc distributed all over the internet? I'll go with what the Santa Clara County's supervising deputy district attorney for sexual assault stated
“It doesn’t have to be posted on Facebook or sent to the National Inquirer,” Hamilton said. “It’s a lot worse if you put it out there.”
Hamilton said Washinton’s charges are common and believed they likely only made national headlines because of Washington’s connection to the Huskers.
IMO he gets some type of probation, if guilty
Of revenge porn?
Although the distribution aspect of the law doesn’t say it has to be sent someone else other than those in the video, it just has to be distributed without permission.
As far as level of emotional distress, again I don’t think the law stipulates that emotional stress has levels.
You are taking one line from the DAs office about posting it on Facebook or giving it to the tabloids. Hamilton is saying it is worse to mass distribute it to the general public or selling it to a tabloid but doesn’t say that sending it back to the girl wasn’t a violation of the law.
Horrific? She was getting tag teamed because she likes it like that. I bet it didn’t become horrific until her parents found out.What? How is that not a horrific thing to do? She obviously had a really bad ordeal with all of it and in case you missed it the alleged incident is tha5 it was sent with malicious intent and he called her a hoe. Maybe he didn't, but if he did then I wouldn't say sending a video of her making what was probably the biggest mistake of her life, and one in which she said she was coerced into performing sex acts and then having the whole school watch to remind her of it is “not exactly a horrific thing to do”.
I agree!Personally I wouldn't care if this was a Hawkeye player. I do some prison ministry with a local group and the idea that this kid would be labled as a sex offender is mind blowing to me. It really destroys their life and for what he allegedly did, I just think it would be cruel and unusual punishment.
Ok. What about the fact that if he did this...this video had already caused legal issues, was known by authorities, and he was told to delete it.Why don't we let it play out. You can yell at the weeds growing in your lawn in the meantime. I think the girl was a bit of a tramp. Gasp... Chew on that.
Are you and red scowl related?Horrific? She was getting tag teamed because she likes it like that. I bet it didn’t become horrific until her parents found out.
Youre being emotional and still ignoring what I pointed out above. Known video, authorities already gave all the kids who had it a chance to delete it, told to delete, kept it, sent it over a year later.I wonder if Washington and the female in question were dating when she acquiesced to an orgy? Geez, I don't know. Do you? Nobody was arrested. Seems consensual.
Why did she get back in touch with him ? My wife bangs another guy and then feels bad? **** that ho.
Ok. What about the fact that if he did this...this video had already caused legal issues, was known by authorities, and he was told to delete it.
Does that matter at all?
Youre being emotional and still ignoring what I pointed out above. Known video, authorities already gave all the kids who had it a chance to delete it, told to delete, kept it, sent it over a year later.
This is the tough part if he in fact did this. Who cares how she feels about it and that shes a hoe. That doesn't matter. I don't think they get graphs out in trial cases of how much a girl was a hoe 3 years ago.
Youre being emotional and still ignoring what I pointed out above. Known video, authorities already gave all the kids who had it a chance to delete it, told to delete, kept it, sent it over a year later.
This is the tough part if he in fact did this. Who cares how she feels about it and that shes a hoe. That doesn't matter. I don't think they get graphs out in trial cases of how much a girl was a hoe 3 years ago.
Really not good about it. That doesn't really matter in the case.I am not being emotional. I'm being realistic. How would a teenager feel about his girlfriend banging a gang of dudes? Let's start with that. Its logic.
Neither I nor tuco want to hang him high. You're putting words in our mouths as a defense mechanism because you know you're wrong. And you are angry, calm down.How would you feel ? You hang em' high folks should leave it to the shitty justice he will receive in California. And wait on the verdict. Tuco... Tuco.... I hope your apple sauce is to your liking.
If he is found not guilty it will be because he didn't do what was alleged, which is possible as he has to be proven guilty.If it goes to a jury, I think common sense will win out, even in California. Mo will play for the Huskers again.
You need a kleenex?
How do you know all of that?You are a rubberband. I've read your posts and Tucos, but you you evaluated it all without questioning the motives. And from what I understand this is mostly driven from the step mom. I'm not gonna sugar coat it. Defendant was blowing multiple dudes on video. She had sex with them and was ok with being videotaped and is of a similar age with Maurice.
She initiates contact with him. He calls her a ho and sends the video. At the time of the recording they were of a similar age. After he sent it I believe they are both of consenting age. I think the daughter is a slut, but that doesn't play well. Step mom is pushing it and dad is silent.
If he is found not guilty it will be because he didn't do what was alleged, which is possible as he has to be proven guilty.
It wont be because “ah yeah he did it but wouldn't you be angry and hold onto that banned video two years after the fact?”
Expect plea deal, prosecution is dragging it out on purpose.
How do you know all of that?
You are a rubberband. I've read your posts and Tucos, but you you evaluated it all without questioning the motives. And from what I understand this is mostly driven from the step mom. I'm not gonna sugar coat it. Defendant was blowing multiple dudes on video. She had sex with them and was ok with being videotaped and is of a similar age with Maurice.
She initiates contact with him. He calls her a ho and sends the video. At the time of the recording they were of a similar age. After he sent it I believe they are both of consenting age. I think the daughter is a slut, but that doesn't play well. Step mom is pushing it and dad is silent.
You run with that defense in a case of proven child pornography...such as a 15 year old girl nude on video sent from your phone, much less involved in blowing, and you might "hang high".
If I'm a prosecutor I'm not going for the manufacturing of porn at the age of 15....only an idiot would think that is the issue. I'm going for possession of child pornography at the age of 18...the age of accountability in the United States.
Gosh I hope you don't become a lawyer. Stick to the internet gorilla thing, it suits you better. I laugh sometimes. You're a funny guy Tommy.
Really not good about it. That doesn't really matter in the case.
You always attack the accusers character. Especially in a case like this. Why would you call a black man a gorilla ?
You run with that defense in a case of proven child pornography...such as a 15 year old girl nude on video sent from your phone, much less involved in blowing, and you might "hang high".
If I'm a prosecutor I'm not going for the manufacturing of porn at the age of 15....only an idiot would think that is the issue. I'm going for possession of child pornography at the age of 18...the age of accountability in the United States.
Gosh I hope you don't become a lawyer. Stick to the internet gorilla thing, it suits you better. I laugh sometimes. You're a funny guy Tommy.
You've got a heart that is black as night RS.
I am a far better man than your old ass ever thought of being. I am not a black man. You hateful candyass.