That makes a lot more sense. Ha.My original post should’ve said Jayden Daniels, which is what I meant
Good fun fact, though!
Why do I need odds when my side of this proposition - which is not something I initiated - is that a projected 1st rounder won’t get drafted?Why do you need odds?
1. Do you think the new rules have not impacted passing and overall offensive stats? Nobody can possibly be this naive.Here’s the actual summary…….
You said he was the worst Alabama QB in 20 years.
I showed stats proving that he was actually one of the best. You started claiming that it’s a different game now because of “targeting” rules. Ha!
Then you said no one will want him in the league because he can’t make short and intermediate throws
I showed you two draft boards that’s had him as a first round pick. I offered a $100 or $500 bet that he gets drafted (thus proving that someone wants him).
You then wanted me to give you “odds”.
This was a simple
Guy 1 - I am telling you that X will happen!
Guy 2 - no it won’t. I’ll bet you $100 that it won’t.
Guy 1 - ummm well I need “odds” now to make that bet.
You had a stance. I called BS and claimed the opposite. You weren’t willing to back up your stance.
It just proved that you really didn’t believe your own nonsense.
I'm thinking of bumping it sometime around the draft. DM me if you anticipate that causing you physical pain. I might reconsider.
New rules? NCAA outlawed spearing 18 years ago and targeting 16 years ago. It’s not like the “new guy” is posting stats playing within new rules vs the other over the last 20. Good Lord.1. Do you think the new rules have not impacted passing and overall offensive stats? Nobody can possibly be this naive.
2. The draft stuff is yours and yours alone, and proves nothing. I stand by my statement that Milroe is the worst Bama QB in 20 years, and will be vindicated when he loses his job once again this season.
Sorry, Bill. You’ve proven nothing except the fact you’re either a cheapskate or don’t understand how wagering works.
If you indeed wanted to back up your conviction here, you’d have zero issue booking this bet with the fair odds I am due.
My statement had nothing to do with the bet you proposed.New rules? NCAA outlawed spearing 18 years ago and targeting 16 years ago. It’s not like the “new guy” is posting stats playing within new rules vs the other over the last 20. Good Lord.
Cheapskate - I’ve had more exotic cars than you’ve had junker over the last 20 years.
You don’t get “odds”. You made a statement. I called you on nonsense. You don’t want to back it up.
That just means you dont believe in your own nonsense.
If someone hasn't had “junker” car how does this make sense? Or are you saying any car that isn’t an exotic is a junker?Cheapskate - I’ve had more exotic cars than you’ve had junker over the last 20 years.
Daily drivers aren’t junkers. I honestly don’t know what he has. Was just irritated about the diversion tactics from the main point - that he made a strong comment that I called him on and now he wants odds for any associate wager.If someone hasn't had “junker” car how does this make sense? Or are you saying any car that isn’t an exotic is a junker?
You started the flex - would love to know what exotics you have owned. I like cars so I’m curious.