More cockroaches and clowns showing up here. I thought you buff fans stopped worrying about Nebraska.
So, who has the advantage with CU being your first game
- Thread starter Scavenger
- Start date
you didn't watch any of the nebraska games the last three years did you....... Riley lost games with junior high game management alone, not to mention development, strength and conditioning, accountability, amongst many other things. it seems you may have come here looking to create an argument more than anything else.... typical Buff.
Riley suddenly forgot to coach when he was at NU. I see. Maybe, just maybe, some of those players were hot garbage. Maybe, just maybe, that's why they didn't find their way to NFL rosters on the whole. Maybe, just maybe, you're being a bit myopic. I'm not sure I'm looking to create an argument. Saying Mike Riley is a junior high coach just doesn't hold water whatsoever. The Huskers were bad, because they were, well, bad. Mike obviously didn't do a great job, but there is no question that the talent level was not that great. None! If it were, the NFL would have come calling in droves. I mean, they went after division II players. Be real. NU may very well win this game. You have a good program. But, I doubt any person involved with CU looks at this game as unwinnable.
Or maybe, just maybe a career .500 coach posted a .500 record in his time at Nebraska?
Great answer. Proof is provided in the numbers. You D is hot garbage after he left. Waiting for you to prove me wrong.
Already did in game 1. Program gets 645 yards week 0 gets under 300 yards in week 1 against CU (that's more than a 60% drop in production). Leavitt's defense was garbage when he first coached at CU. It was only good with bunches of NFL draft picks on it. This year, better depth, better speed, better talent, already better results. Thanks for asking for the numbers.
If Akron win was needed to get to 6 wins, then this team probably wouldn't have reached 6 anyway.
YOu CU guys are funny. So one game against a bad team, and all of the sudden your D is good again.... FFS you are something else.
The other negative for CU is that they played a piss poor defense. The false sense of security is a real thing. By reading some of the comments posted by the CU fans on here, they are falling for it too.
CU is still CU, one winning season in 5 years is still 1 winning season in 5 years. Y'all need to slow your roll
CU is still CU, one winning season in 5 years is still 1 winning season in 5 years. Y'all need to slow your roll
Washington, WSU, Utah say hello. Hell, USC got lazy after getting up big, and ASU crushed cu in the 4th qtr. But other than that, mostly competitive.
Got lazy? That's how you describe another team whooping on you I guess. That must be why we had more yards gained than USC. Hell, if not for the touchdown called back, game might have gone into OT considering we were at the 2 yard line at end of game. ASU did win late in the 4th quarter, but it wouldn't have gotten there if not for 2 wide open touchdown passes dropped. Hell, another touchdown called back against UCLA and no one is talking crap about a non bowl season. So, yes, mostly competitive both by score and by process. Far different than being 40 points behind early.Washington, WSU, Utah say hello. Hell, USC got lazy after getting up big, and ASU crushed cu in the 4th qtr. But other than that, mostly competitive.
Dude, your coach has 2 winning season as a head coach. Your DC has 1 winning season as a DC.
Come back and talk your mess when you have a team that has accomplished something worth a damn.
What a reach with the usc garble, big reach. ASU flat out dominated cu in the 4th qtr, end of story. Shut your pie hole now and get out of here.
The fact that some people are actually pounding their chest is funny. I know very little of what Nebraska will look like and even less of Colorado. But Colorado has been one of the worst power 5 programs for some time. And I remember you pulling this crappola every single year. I would have thought you would have learned by now but I guess not. I just hope the actual players are expecting Nebraska to be a no talent 4-8 2017 team.
Look at the stats (USC/CU) and get back to me and yes, a TD was called back that quelled early momentum. Like I said (haven't even argued my point), ASU situation doesn't even happen if we catch the ball. We would have been way too far ahead. Bye Felicia.
Our coach has a 19-7 record and a 70% winning pct
Your coach has a 41-59 record and a 41% winning pct
try again sir
Why is anyone even responding to the OP? He has and always will be trash. You should have seen how happy he was on the MB when CU fans threw piss balloons back in the day at Nebraska.
cu was out scored 24-3 in the 4th qtr vs ASU. That is the stat that voids your argument, dork. USC was up 20-0 and coasted after that. Oh, I know, to you, cu was winning the whole way through but managed somehow to give it away. Beat it, 60 IQ BOY.
We can play “if” too. If against BYU, if against Miami, if against Illinois, If against Northwestern, If against Iowa, if all of those 8 or less point losses would have been wins, Mikey might still be here. But they weren’t. None of the above matters. You still lost.
“If if’s and but’s were candies and nuts we’d all have a Merry Christmas.”
I will say it again, you came looking for an argument. I can provide hundreds of different things that would support that Riley is not a good coach, probably not even by Colorado standards. The other thing you might try is reading comprehension...... junior high game management is not exactly calling Riley a junior high coach, but you twist it how you see fit. Riley lost at least five games in his time here because he couldn't manage the clock.
Quality roster management and getting talent/recruiting in the program is part of the head coaches job, a huge part of the job, at least in most programs.... not sure how people see things in Boulder. Finally, you can also politely show me where I stated the game is unwinnable for CU..... I said nothing of the sort, in fact, I believe the game is a flip of the coin..... again you just here looking to argue.
That's a good question, but I don't know. I do, however, expect Nebraska to beat teams like Colorado. Do you believe the Husker players cared about last season after Wisconsin? I think they gave up.
We'll find out.
Advantage Buffs: game played and time in offensive and defensive systems.
Advantage Huskers: everything else. I think your quarterback could be annoying tho.
The Buffs are now a seasoned team compared to last season. Montez has a full season under his belt. Last season everything was new including three defensive coaches. Nebraska is the exact opposite: New coaches, new system, true freshman QB. If this game was on a neutral site, Colorado would be favored.
Cute report. When the F we get new coaches? I musta missed it, thanks for info.
Last edited:
You either talk like a caveman or you're drunk. What the Huskers don't have a new coaching staff?
Similar threads
Baseball Nebraska 13, South Alabama 2: Huskers bounce back with 4 HRs, another gem from "Seven Sears"
