You don’t like answering questions.
We get it.
(Extremely funny coming from the guy who couldn’t stop posting about fleeing the country on his wife’s visa in 2020)
Purdy Refuses to Face Media After L
- Thread starter king_kong_
- Start date
We get it.
(Extremely funny coming from the guy who couldn’t stop posting about fleeing the country on his wife’s visa in 2020)
I think it is easier and more likely for an OC to learn and adjust vs a college QB to magically get better after years of physically not having it.
Then why hasn’t satt gotten better at preventing turnovers by his offense?
But rattler for example improves on it instantly after he leaves based on nothing but being a year older?
because these are 3 different offenses with differing issues that don't get smoothed over in 1 year. He led 4 less ints. Good but nothing amazing. He is like 23 years old now.
why didn’t it get better from year 1 to year 2 at South Carolina?
led the SEC in turnovers both seasons.
You say guys don’t have it after 7 games and want them discarded but yet you go to bat for someone who doesn’t have it after several years.
Very on brand, smart aleck.
You gotta admire a guy that continually gets dunked on, but keeps coming back for more.
His wife is (was?) a nurse and he couldn’t wait to flee oppressive Kansas and his dead end job for the freedom of New Zealand during COVID
Posted about it constantly
my wife wanted to potentially live in another country and New Zealand seemed nice. That's it.
Such a female to bring up things from years ago that had nothing to do with a conversation.
So now it’s touchdown to turnover ratio?
5 ints in 3 games isn’t a lot? Seems in line with the turnover per game stats here.
Which is weird, because it’s entirely different players
Probably just a coincidence
We’re talking strictly about satt and turnovers, though.
Well, until now, when you just moved the goalpost.
He’s taking a wait and see approach
Only logical
Unless of course you’re talking about first year players, then snap judgements are in order
5 ints was wrong. It was 3. Check my math if you want to.
You said his offense never improved yet it did. You were wrong.
Again, we’re talking strictly about turnovers - the only stat a Satt led offense consistently leads in
This is also a little confusing
Year over year improvement is how you judge coaches. Yet you find yourself pointing to little itty bitty sample sizes (3 games out of 25) to attempt to further your point.
Which is it? Macro or micro?
3 ints the last 3 games is an improvement over the past 10, is it not?
Yes, it is a small sample size but you made the point that they never improved.
I should have prefaced that by saying I CERTAINLY don't think Rhule should just stand pat irt the qb room. That is NOT what I am saying.
In fact, I'd be jist as disappointed and even pissed if he did. Irregardless, you still have to try to work with what you have right now. I also don't hate any of the qbs, simply because they may not have the talent level.
In Purdy's case, the Maryland game was an over/under concept. He should have thrown the under route. The Iowa game, he misread the coverage. Is he going to be great? Do I want to see him or the other two as the opening game starter next year? No.
I do hope at least one of them is around, though. You still need a backup.
I would agree with you irt Sims. That ship has sailed. He is what he is. I feel terrible for him. He is a great team player, but you can NEVER put him on the field again.
3 games isn’t enough to base any judgement on with regards to coaching according to you.
on the whole, satt piloted a turnover machine at South Carolina.
Just like in year 1 at Nebraska, which also enjoyed a stretch of 3 games averaging less turnovers per game than it did in total.
Sims has all the physical tools but he is me on the golf course right now… yips
How many fumbles?
And is it okay to make judgements on coaches after 6 games now?
Is that enough waiting and seeing? Or is it completely arbitrary like your entire argument in the first place?
10 turnovers in 6 games
Looks about right for a satt-led offense firing on all cylinders
Can’t judge, though. Never know the root cause.
🫠
All made by Satt’s offense
Which is the entire point
Despite having an infinitely more physically talented quarterback than he’d ever coached, the turnovers remained
The point is you like to attribute everything to one person to fulfil some ego thing you have going on. You can't be objective because you are too emotional.
Are offensive penalties on the OC?
Then enlighten me.
I’m all ears.
How is satterfield’s obvious turnover problem at every stop he’s made objectively not attributable to him?
Because first years are tough to overhaul an offense, get ones of the same page, especially when you have average to below average players, which Nebraska currently has on offense.
Sims and HH averaged around 3 TOs per game. Purdy averaged a little over 1 TO per game, against better teams as well.
In the back half of his 2nd year at a place with better players his offense also turned the ball over at an above avg rate
You didn’t answer the question - how are satterfield’s offenses’ consistent turnover woes over the course of his OC career not attributable to him? Objectively, of course.
Also - are turnovers on downs not turnovers now? Do they need a new publicist?
You want me to try to prove a negative that you will never accept, even if I could.
Do you plan on being pissed off all off season?
