Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OH, YOU'D LIKE THAT WOODN'T YOU?Dear lord...just give the kid the TD!!!!
There's always next week...Great job Indiana! ISU, KSU, and Indiana are doing it while we’re still waiting for our signature victory over a quality opponent.
Unfortunately, an "Osborne" would be not completing the 2 pt try. I'm just the messenger.Ball looked like it was out of bounds actually. No way to overturn with limited camera angles though. Credit to IU's head coach for pulling the Osborne.
The pylon is in. This was an easy call. The ball tipped the pylon over, meaning the ball crossed the goal line.When it’s clearly out before there is any way for it to cross, it should be overturned
Unfortunately, an "Osborne" would be not completing the 2 pt try. I'm just the messenger.
Agree that it needed to stand as called on the field. Not 100% certain the plane was broken first, but not enough evidence to overturn it.Looking in slow motion I saw it this way. As he was stretching the ball out the front tip crossed the goaline, then the back tip hit the out of bounds then the ball hit the pylon. So IMO touchdown.
The pylon was tipped before the rubber bits started coming up from the turf, which were out of bounds, so it seems like an obvious call.Agree that it needed to stand as called on the field. Not 100% certain the plane was broken first, but not enough evidence to overturn it.
Penn State can chalk the loss up to being stupid enough to fall for the laydown defense when up by one point. Just eat the clock and IU never ties the game in the first place.
The ball hit the ground, out of bounds, prior to contacting the pylonThe pylon is in. This was an easy call. The ball tipped the pylon over, meaning the ball crossed the goal line.
Doesn't look like it to me.The ball hit the ground, out of bounds, prior to contacting the pylon
That’s how I saw it too. But with the camera angles available, it looked like the nose of the ball broke the plane before the ball touched either the sideline or the pylon. That’s why I think letting the call stand was the right decision.The ball hit the ground, out of bounds, prior to contacting the pylon
It is an impossibility to say that the ball made contact with the pylon before touching the ground out of boundsThe pylon was tipped before the rubber bits started coming up from the turf, which were out of bounds, so it seems like an obvious call.
When it’s clearly out before there is any way for it to cross, it should be overturned
This^^^That white line is part of the endzone. Any part of the ball just barely breaks that line. It's a 2 point play. Forget the pylon and the other nonsense. It was very close but the replay officials let it stand. And that was the right call.
That white line is part of the endzone. Any part of the ball just barely breaks that line. It's a 2 point play. Forget the pylon and the other nonsense. It was very close but the replay officials let it stand. And that was the right call.