OT: Mystery drones across Nebraska

[dinglefritz]

It is amazing that y’all think the military is full of idiots…. They will intercept those that are a threat. Crazy I thought the right were pro- military…. Weird…. Just uninformed….

Then if they’re not idiots then they need to come forth with a better explanation ( factual or not) for what thousands of people are seeing. IF it’s our guys just say it’s training exercises. IF it’s somebody else say it’s training exercises. Don’t have the FBI come out and say it’s manned planes because witnesses have already said they were not. Again, my first inclination was to believe it’s our military or CiA. The longer it goes the more I doubt that.

 

[itseasyas1-2-3]

Then if they’re not idiots then they need to come forth with a better explanation ( factual or not) for what thousands of people are seeing. IF it’s our guys just say it’s training exercises. IF it’s somebody else say it’s training exercises. Don’t have the FBI come out and say it’s manned planes because witnesses have already said they were not. Again, my first inclination was to believe it’s our military or CiA. The longer it goes the more I doubt that.

Months ago, I predicted to one of our forum members this soft roll out of "Project Bluebeam" would occur.

What was once an occassional sighting of a UAP or UFO has become a "thing." A vast number of citizens who went about their daily life with zero interest in things "unexplained" are now being fed unverified information by many news sources. The key to any successful psyops is to slowly, but steadily, bring in more and more people to fuel speculation one way or the other, but ultimately the direction its been intended all along.

IF the govt knew what all these sighted objects were, they wouldn't tell you because not enough of the masses are engaged. If the govt didn't know what all these sighted objects are, that would violate too many beliefs and they still wouldn't tell you.

Because none of us know for sure what the end game is, we just get to go along for the ride in whatever fashion pleases our senses. At some point, there will be a strong showing of what that might entail. Maybe something like an unveiling on, shall we say, Super Bowl Sunday when the whole world is watching?

Now you have everyone's attention. The narrative is still being written.

 

[Laner2]

It is amazing that y’all think the military is full of idiots…. They will intercept those that are a threat. Crazy I thought the right were pro- military…. Weird…. Just uninformed….

Ah, yes, the back-handed political commentary. Go away, piglet, afore I break out a little bongo justice.......

 

[WHCSC]

I think they are portal spy drones from the SEC

 

[Laner2]

I think they are portal spy drones from the SEC

So, we've got something worth spying? Must be Spinner's night-time reflective lederhosen.

 

[redwine65]

It's good drones wasn't around when I grew up, we got into enough trouble with dirt bikes, fireworks and pellet guns

 

[MargotDeeper]

Comedy Isn’t your forte?

 

[Cubskers21]

SIAP

 

[Bruce1981]

SIAP

View embedded media

We have satellites for that

 

[Streamer15]

We have satellites for that

I would think sensitivity would increase as distance decreases, but I am out of my depth here.

 

[dinglefritz]

We have satellites for that

Drones can in fact detect things that a satellite can't. Satellites are also limited by cloud cover and darkness. Some drones are also capable of infrared technology.

 

[Streamer15]

Drones can in fact detect things that a satellite can't. Satellites are also limited by cloud cover and darkness. Some drones are also capable of infrared technology.

Satellites can have more than one sensor tech. I agree with you on the drones being able to detect certain things better than satellites, but not for that reason.

 

[oldjar07]

I would think sensitivity would increase as distance decreases, but I am out of my depth here.

Image resolution scales inversely with distance. The other factor is the size of the image sensor, with bigger sensors letting more light in. Satellites are bigger out of necessity. But then satellites are on orbital trajectories, they're not necessarily going to be in the right spot to capture a moving drone at any moment. All this to say satellites are not going to be the right tool for the job.

 

[itseasyas1-2-3]

The timing is odd. I wouldn't say I am wearing my tinfoil hat yet, but I am keeping it close by.

It seems most reasonable people in here seem to feel it is originated by government, and along with that I'm just asking if so, then what is the end game? I don't see anyone else asking that.

Surely the government is not allowing this, what has become, a real public thing just for the hell of it? For someone like Kirby to say its not ours, we don't know what it is, but it poses no threat is kinda laughable.

The video pretty much debunks the idea that they're flying from a "mother ship". I think his explanation may in fact explain some of the large drones. I do think it's very possible that they're CIA or FBI operated drones looking for something. It's pretty clear that there are civilians some with nefarious intent operating small ones in restricted areas. I'm sure the FBI will get to the bottom of it. After watching the orchestration with the Floyd riots nothing would surprise me anymore.
'

Awhile back the government opened up a drone area passageway, a proving ground, if you will, in NJ.
There are over 50 different drone companies that produce drones in that area. Then they began to allow drones to fly at night which brought out a lot of likely citizen activity as well.

It's possible one of the planned results would be the government making it illegal for private citizens, who aren't corporate members or the government to even fly drones legally. All it would take is some citizens, or a nefarious actor, to fly a drone into a small plane or other, and cause it to go down, or even something a lot less dramatic.

That may seem far fetched, but the government wasn't fond of private drones flying over the devastation in North Carolina, since that upsets the public even more. We all know anytime the government can't control the narrative, they take measures to try to do that.

When one or more posters suggest we may be looking for dirty bombs, none of us know if that's true or not, but it could be. The last thing I'm gonna do is dismiss it out of hand. At least they bring forward their theory or opinion, yet some on here offer nothing to the discussion.

Looks like I managed to reply to two different posts here.

 

[MargotDeeper]

It seems most reasonable people in here seem to feel it is originated by government, and along with that I'm just asking if so, then what is the end game? I don't see anyone else asking that.

Surely the government is not allowing this, what has become, a real public thing just for the hell of it? For someone like Kirby to say its not ours, we don't know what it is, but it poses no threat is kinda laughable.

Awhile back the government opened up a drone area passageway, a proving ground, if you will, in NJ.
There are over 50 different drone companies that produce drones in that area. Then they began to allow drones to fly at night which brought out a lot of likely citizen activity as well.

It's possible one of the planned results would be the government making it illegal for private citizens, who aren't corporate members or the government to even fly drones legally. All it would take is some citizens, or a nefarious actor, to fly a drone into a small plane or other, and cause it to go down, or even something a lot less dramatic.

That may seem far fetched, but the government wasn't fond of private drones flying over the devastation in North Carolina, since that upsets the public even more. We all know anytime the government can't control the narrative, they take measures to try to do that.

When one or more posters suggest we may be looking for dirty bombs, none of us know if that's true or not, but it could be. The last thing I'm gonna do is dismiss it out of hand. At least they bring forward their theory or opinion, yet some on here offer nothing to the discussion.

Looks like I managed to reply to two different posts here.

Confirmed, you're a fluckin' wacko jacko.

 

[sklarbodds]

No politics guys.

 

[MargotDeeper]

No politics guys.

Guys?

 

[sklarbodds]

Guys?

Well the current offenders are guys, but the same applies to anyone.

 

[MargotDeeper]

Well the current offenders are guys, but the same applies to anyone.

 

[inWV]

Well the current offenders are guys, but the same applies to anyone.

This isn’t really politics, but it sure ain’t football.

 

[MargotDeeper]

This isn’t really politics, but it sure ain’t football.

Reuben disagrees.

 

[schuele]

Awhile back the government opened up a drone area passageway, a proving ground, if you will, in NJ.
There are over 50 different drone companies that produce drones in that area. Then they began to allow drones to fly at night which brought out a lot of likely citizen activity as well.

The FAA rule allowing drones to fly at night was finalized in December 2020.

 

[MargotDeeper]

The FAA rule allowing drones to fly at night was finalized in September 2023

Fify, unless you have a link.

 

[schuele]

Fify, unless you have a link.

Here you go:

https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2021-08/OOP_Final%20Rule.pdf

Federal Register :: Request Access

And here's the section of the rule summary that addresses night operations:

3. Operations at Night​

This rule allows routine operations of small UAS at night under two conditions. First, the remote pilot in command must complete a current initial knowledge test or recurrent training, as applicable, to ensure familiarity with the risks and appropriate mitigations for nighttime operations. Second, the small unmanned aircraft must have lighted anti-collision lighting visible for at least 3 statute miles that has a flash rate sufficient to avoid a collision. The requirements for operations at night are discussed in Section IX of this preamble.