I do not see this nonsense as that tool has been on ignore nearly from the beginning of their posting history.
My decision seems like the correct one everytime some of their drivel leaks into other posts.
OT- DC commercial plane and Blackhawk collide
- Thread starter HBK4life
- Start date
My decision seems like the correct one everytime some of their drivel leaks into other posts.
Women should not really be allowed to pilot aircraft in the first place.. (I know, label me a misogynist) but it does human society no good to feed women all these lies about how they can do anything as well as a man can do.. it actually does a big disservice to women and the entire community as a whole.
I, for one, am shocked by this opinion.
Please tell us more things women should never be allowed to do.
I agree ...but there is no way they didnt see that plane before impact
All Im saying is there was no visual of reacting to seeing that plane at the last second.
And the helicopter was above 200 ft regardless if they saw the other plane.
Why? Everyone overlooks that part. Without that there is no accident.
Doesn't have to be a gain.
Again it looks deliberate doesn't mean it's deliberate.
😆 true. Your post made me think of 3 females the other day I encountered on the hiway. They would have been great candidates for the Japanese as kamikaze pilots in ww2. Holy cow
Even landing the plane is still going a few hundred MPH. Even if you see at the speed of both plane and chopper you literally would have zero reaction time
That's a Blackhawk.
There would be movement in surprise. Doesn't mean they don't hit but there is no way they didn't see that plane before impact
And again why were they above 200ft?
I'm not saying I'm right. I'm saying it looks that way.
How is it a problem? Or is this where you assume to know the feelings of others then dictate what can be said?
Why would I let someone’s post bother me? Why do you want to censor him?
you’d make a great NAZI. Go get your neighbors, buddy. They may be crazy, therefore dumb and worthless. Better off in camps, amirite
Ya . The only thing I and other OPs have said they his posts were in bad taste.
Nobody is overlooking elevation as the primary factor. The NTSB is still analyzing data to determine what the actual elevation First reports were 500 feet. That wasn’t accurate. Then I heard 350 from a pilot yesterday. They need the chopper’s flight data recorder to see if the altimeter in the chopper was accurate and what it registered at impact.
Having just flown in to and out of that airport I can guarantee you that the collision occurred way lower than 500’. Given the impact point in the middle of the rover there and the fact that the runway starts right at the rover’s edge, I don’t believe you could land if you were at 500’ at that point. NTSB and DoD officials are non-committal on elevation. Initial reports appear to be inaccurate. It’s still possible the plane pilot came in low to try to stop and taxi closer to his terminal
Saw the wreckage out of my window when we left DCA yesterday using a different runway. One thing I noted when we landed on the runway that plane was destined for was how rough the landing was. You needed your seatbelt cinched tight to keep from getting bounced around. It was very windy and gusty the night of the crash. No doubt it was bouncing both aircraft around.
It actually hasn’t definitively been proven the chopper was above 200’. Initial reports and elevation were inaccurate. I guarantee you it was less than the 500’ the plane supposedly was supposed to be at. One new estimate was 350’ but that’s not from a flight data recorder. I think it’s going to end up closer to 200 than 500 given the midpoint of the river where the crash happened. I understand why they patrol that river with Blackhawks but that’s a sketchy situation.
Multiple factors contributed. All will be looked at including the dedicated chopper controller leaving work early. 😕
It really doesn’t matter if it was 250 ft . That’s 50 ft above where the rules say they fly .if she is at 200 there is no accident.
