My President has seen it.
lawmakers have to get involved.. we need competition and small businesses.. not mega corporations that own entire industries
1000 employees isn’t even that large. I’m genuinely curious why you think society would be better if we only had companies under 1000 employees?
They fight for our rights under the contract they negotiate for and represent people who are wrongly fired. Management at the city are so dumb they had to give 3 people back pay for the last year to 3 employees who were wrongfully terminated.
I am. With masking tape over the camera lens......if they write me up and it sticks I'm moving on.
I’m anxious to see how that plays out. I like that path - doesn’t prevent you from doing your job - will be interesting to see if the union has your back if something does go south and also will be interesting to see how long it take them to notice!
The union or the management. Telling the union does nothing other than give them notice that they may need to represent you.
It's the 3mm kind. Tested on my phone lens first. Looks exactly like you described.
Can you image the airlines having to break up? Delta has 36,000 employees just in Atlanta, GA let alone the entire U.S.
I think resistance is futile. It's going to become a way of life whether we like it or even know about it.
one thing I'll say in favor of companies monitoring their employees. I've seen multiple trucks driving down the interstate swerving from side to side. When I've gotten up the nerve to zip by their speed governed asses I invariably see some asshole staring at this phone. Undoubtedly he's bored and watching videos or on social media. It's an epidemic and I don't know how companies can stop it. I called one time on a plumber's van that was doing this. The company had their name on the side of the van and I memorized the number and called them a little later and asked them to at least talk to the driver. He damned near ran me off the interstate. I've called 911 twice on obviously drunk truckers on I-29. Once they had me follow the guy with my flashers on for about 20 miles until a trooper could get there. It was 10 at night, dark and he didn't have tail lights. There's some bad stuff out there. A street sweeper though........mmmaybe not necessary.
I don't disagree on the phone usage while driving. I saw someone in a Burtons van on 680 just last week and thought of my situation. If it was just to surveillance me I would still have issues with being "watched" but probably wouldn't go this route. Issue is it's everyone driving. Yesterday while plowing i can't give you a number of people I saw intentionally gunning through red lights, looking at phone while driving, etc. This camera system goes both ways so they can see who is at fault. If only they didn't include the AI and my biometric data being captured and stored by an entity i know will not be responsible with it, this wouldn't really be that big of an issue for me.
I've had multiple chicks go by me over 80mph on I-29 and they'll never look up from their phone. I see them coming and watch their face in my mirror then look over as they go by. I'll lay on the horn and some of them never even flinch. These aren't cars that would have the self driving options. My wife thinks I'm a prick for honking at them.
I wonder what the image of the First Beast will be where the Second Beast will give breath of life to, so that the image can speak?
I don't use face unlock or do video calls, but this is completely different than an unresponsible organization storing my facial biometric data, eventually having said system determining my mood from my facial expressions or having the system determine health situations of the entire work force.
