Wasn’t Mo a minor when he sent this?
Nope, he was born in December 1999, so he would have been 18 in March 2018 when it was sent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn’t Mo a minor when he sent this?
Not saying it doesn't ever happen, but you tried explaining your point in a terrible way.Serious. It happens a lot.
The same Bruning who sits baseline front row at NU basketball games? I assume so and believe he is an NU booster since those seats typically require a seat donation. Probably not the best optics either.Please explain in detail what the staff did about it. Don't say, "made any public acknowledgement of it," "dropped his scholarship" or "didn't play him right away as a true freshman."
An investigator on the case said the Sheriff’s Department has been unable to interview Washington during the months-long investigation after making requests through the University of Nebraska’s Athletic Department, as well as Washington’s former attorney, Jon Bruning, who is the former Attorney General of Nebraska.
The investigator said Bruning questioned whether charges would actually be filed against his client when contacted last fall by the Sheriff’s Department.
“The general air was, ‘Is this really as big of a deal as you’re making it?’” the investigator said. “I explained to him that we do take these cases very seriously. Cases like this can have severe consequences, especially for the victims, throughout their entire lives, and we were investigating wholeheartedly because of that fact.”
Bruning, reached Friday by NBC Bay Area, declined to comment on the case.
That's not how it works, sweetheart. It's not my job to prove they didn't *secretly* do anything about it. It's their job to prove this isn't what it looks like, that they knew this kid did something real shitty but tried to sweep it under the rug because damn can he juke a defender.
It's going to become their job to explain to reporters why they continued to honor his commitment after learning of this incident before he ever qualified academically. Then they'll have to answer as to what, if any punitive actions they took at that time. If none, they'll be asked why.
Like I said, they're behind the story. They're the ones now who are going to get grilled about this when instead they could have taken control of the narrative and made a big show of putting him into a counseling program, etc. Instead the University has made zero public acknowledgement that they knew of this for 11 months.
Did we're any of the so called rapist charged? Or is mo the scapegoatSo. The guys who perpetrated the act were not publicly punished anyway, but the kid who was stupid enough to keep the video is going to be. Seems about right for California law. Normally, in my state, IF a minor commits a violent crime, which rape certainly is, they are tried as an adult. If tried as a juvenile and convicted they end up incarcerated at least until the age of 18. I would have to think there has to be some question at least of whether or not this was rape. This stinks of a smear by an NBC affiliate of a football player. JMHO.
OU would take him in a heartbeat. Heck virtually every program in America would take him given what we know thus far. Sigh. I'll let Frost deal with him. I've got my own progeny to deal with.So he can transfer to bama or Clemson, didn't look like the wife beater issue at Ohio state hurt them
Also the same Bruning who would probably throw the book at a kid for selling a little weed.The same Bruning who sits baseline front row at NU basketball games? I assume so and believe he is an NU booster since those seats typically require a seat donation. Probably not the best optics either.
I'm an old fart and I'm going to let the courts and Frost worry about this one. I don't really give a damn about the PR hit. It's Frost's decision.So it’s everyone else’s job, it’s The coaches and AD. Your asking everyone on the message board to give YOU details. It’s ridiculous, your acting like the tipical old fart, that’s sets around the small towns of Nebraska, and assume everything you hear is instantly true. That’s there is not two sides to the story. To old farts like you, first thing you hear is automatically true, no need for courts, judges or any of that. Burn them alive now. Who needs facts from BOTH sides.
Was wondering if anyone else would pick up on the irony...Also the same Bruning who would probably throw the book at a kid for selling a little weed.
I'm sure if those other 2 were high profile football players we'd be reading articles about them too. Not saying it's right, but it's the way it is. Plus those 2 were already "dealt with" right?So. The guys who perpetrated the act were not publicly punished anyway, but the kid who was stupid enough to keep the video is going to be. Seems about right for California law. Normally, in my state, IF a minor commits a violent crime, which rape certainly is, they are tried as an adult. If tried as a juvenile and convicted they end up incarcerated at least until the age of 18. I would have to think there has to be some question at least of whether or not this was rape. This stinks of a smear by an NBC affiliate of a football player. JMHO.
Didn't bama and Lsu or another sec school just in the last year have a couple of players charged with sexual assault? And I believe it all got washed down the riverI'm an old fart and I'm going to let the courts and Frost worry about this one. I don't really give a damn about the PR hit. It's Frost's decision.
He was not involved in what happened on the video, nor was he even present. Whether it was consensual or not has absolutely zero to do with Mo.From the OP's article; "Although she did not report the incident as a rape at the time because she says she felt ashamed, Taylor told NBC Bay Area the video depicts a sexual assault, not a consensual sex act. Taylor alleges the teen boys in the video forced her into having sex after telling her they were going to a fast food restaurant. NBC Bay Area is not naming the teens because they were juveniles at the time and were never charged with sexual assault."
Correct (from what I understand) in that Mo wasn't involved in the acts.
Sweet Jesus you can't spell or read. You don't understand what I've posted at all even though I've gone over it at least about 4 times for you. Part of me wants to try explaining it again, but the wiser part of me is putting you on the ignore list.So it’s everyone else’s job to explain in detail what the coaches did or didn’t do?? Your asking everyone on the message board to give YOU details. It’s ridiculous, your acting like the tipical old fart, that sets around the small towns of Nebraska, and assume everything you hear is instantly true. That there is not two sides to the story. I swear old farts like you, first thing you hear is automatically true, no need for courts, judges or any of that. Burn them alive now. Who needs facts from BOTH sides.
First hand, Bruning bent over backwards trying to keep kids from going to the pen for "selling a little weed". You had to sell "a bunch of weed as in garbage bags full" and do it repeatedly to get even county jail time. You over estimate the rigidity of the sate's prosecutors.Also the same Bruning who would probably throw the book at a kid for selling a little weed.
Sweet Jesus you can't spell or read. You don't understand what I've posted at all even though I've gone over it at least about 4 times for you. Part of me wants to try explaining it again, but the wiser part of me is putting you on the ignore list.
Oh those two things sound equally bad, sending a girl a video of her having consensual sex or sending a girl a video of her being raped?He was not involved in what happened on the video, nor was he even present. Whether it was consensual or not has absolutely zero to do with Mo.
disgustingShe's probably lying. Prob got banged out by a bunch of dudes and couldn't handle the reaction when everyone found out. Parents might've encouraged her to say it wasn't consensual to save some embarrassment.
disgusting
My brother was accused of rape in college. Some girl got drunk with him at a frat party, hung out with him all night, and ended up in his room at the frat house until the wee hours of the morning. The next morning, she walked home and then accused him of rape. It took MONTHS for the truth to come out. Fortunately, his roommates testified to her knocking on his door after he had already returned to his room for the night. She just found his room and then climbed in bed with him. Her boyfriend was pissed that he couldn't find her until the next morning, and rather than tell him that she had cheated on him, she told him she was raped. Finally when her friends testified against her "rape" story, he was cleared.Oh is that what I need to do is leave it up to the judicial system? While you say with no evident basis that it was a consensual act, in direct contradiction to a quote from the girl involved?
Is the judicial system going to sentence him to be kicked off the team or is that still not a thing and up to the University to decide based mostly on how they feel it will play in the court of public opinion?
I'm sure if those other 2 were high profile football players we'd be reading articles about them too. Not saying it's right, but it's the way it is. Plus those 2 were already "dealt with" right?
Mo didn't just keep the video. He texted her back the video saying, "Remember this hoe".... I mean what a huge POS.
Maybe Mo has grown up since March 2018 and I'm not even calling him to be kicked off the team yet, but we've seen how he's acted on Twitter so I'm going to guess he still needs a lot of growing up to do.
I meant the part where you said 'she' probably lying'Agreed, but it happens a ton. There's no debating that.
First hand, Bruning bent over backwards trying to keep kids from going to the pen for "selling a little weed". You had to sell "a bunch of weed as in garbage bags full" and do it repeatedly to get even county jail time. You over estimate the rigidity of the sate's prosecutors.
I meant the part where you said 'she' probably lying'
Two totally separate issues. Sounds like she's certainly considering moving forward with rape charges, but that will require her to be able to get police and prosecutors to take up the case. The video will certainly prove the encounter happened, but no way of knowing if it makes clear she didn't consent. A rape happening and being able to prove that it was rape are very, very different things.Did we're any of the so called rapist charged? Or is mo the scapegoat
In late 2014, Bruning, together with Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, filed a suit in the Supreme Court of the United States in which they asked that Colorado's Amendment 64, which legalized marijuana in that state, be struck down. Bruning and Pruitt argued that the Colorado measure violated the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, since the U.S. Congress had enacted the 1970 Controlled Substances Act, which imposed a nationwide ban on marijuana.[19][20] In connection with the suit, Bruning declared that marijuana was a "gateway drug that is a detriment to society" and that "I don't want it to be a legal option for my children or your option or anyone's children in this state or in this country."[21]
In bed with Pruitt. Nice. States rights for me, but not for thee.In late 2014, Bruning, together with Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, filed a suit in the Supreme Court of the United States in which they asked that Colorado's Amendment 64, which legalized marijuana in that state, be struck down. Bruning and Pruitt argued that the Colorado measure violated the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, since the U.S. Congress had enacted the 1970 Controlled Substances Act, which imposed a nationwide ban on marijuana.[19][20] In connection with the suit, Bruning declared that marijuana was a "gateway drug that is a detriment to society" and that "I don't want it to be a legal option for my children or your option or anyone's children in this state or in this country."[21]
So that's what happened here?Aw you and I agree on something, sadly you are spot on about these young girls
Some of us with good reason don't open links on here anymore. Good way to totally wreck your computer. I quit several years ago. I unfortunately made the mistake recently though of opening a link on Huskers.com and immediately was confronted by a bunch of Chinese print for who knows what.. And I've got a really good anti-virus program.The inability of people to read and comprehend the article is astounding to me.
Did you read the article?Did anybody read the article? She and the two guys left the school after the video surfaced. Pretty sure if it wasn’t consensual, that would’ve been different. I may be wrong, but if a girl is sexually assaulted by two other students, she wouldn’t be the one to leave the school. I’m thinking more embarrassment?
Course, kids can be cruel so we really don’t know the whole story here.