And with Holgerson's fire and attitude!Some people are not intuitive play callers. And some people just need a couple of weeks to figure out how to use and motivate the skill position kids. The kids played hard and with confidence.
And with Holgerson's fire and attitude!Some people are not intuitive play callers. And some people just need a couple of weeks to figure out how to use and motivate the skill position kids. The kids played hard and with confidence.
The only thing that might change is Foley but ST's yesterday were pretty good. I don't think he's the answer and needs to go. I think Satt could stay on as TE coach as his Ends did a phoenominal job yesterday. Donovan ain't goin nowhere especially after what we saw from the line yesterday. One thing that showed yesterday is, That O is playing with Holgerson's sttitude and fire. Now that we have a right system in place with Holgerson running it, who we currently have minus Foley might just prove everyone wrong that's thinking we have to scuttle the entire offensive staff. Change in OC is what the doctor ordered for this most times mentally disabled offense. Bad play calling, with no plays ever running smoohly and very poor execution by very talented players. This offense yesterday ran extremely smooth and had a natural flow to it which we have not seen in at least a decade as this offense was running on all cylinders and the first time in years this team pretty much hummed in all 3 phases of it and this is what wins big games and championships!
I never heard one person complain about having made the change to DH. Not one. The complaints are that it took as long as it did. And that’s a pretty valid complaint
It's your opinion on what you think should happen, but please leave it to the experts. You're not, the coaching staff is!We shall see. DH is the OC and I think he deserves to choose his own guys. Don't assistants sign two year deals? If so ours have had two years so it won't be a money thing. If he's ok with the guys he's working with them I'm ok with them. I just think he should have the right to a yay or a nay on who he wants.
I'd bet Rhule would be willing to do the same. Yesterday looked good but believe there is definitely room to upgrade this staff.
Holla
It's your opinion on what you think should happen, but please leave it to the experts. You're not, the coaching staff is!
Bud, I'm completely correct on the post you laughed at! Try doin some reseach, before you make yourself look like a total idiot!! Stop just being a master of throwin' shit up against the wall hopin' it sticks! You'll be better off! 🤣 🤣 🤣
I reseach before I post, you might wanna try it sometime!
Not tryin to start anything, I'm just stating a plain fact.
Whatever bud! You might wanna look in the mirror before start calling anyone anything! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Yeah that's Wyld lol 😂 🤣 (😉 😉)
Believe what you will sir. You know I know. You are still a joke of a poster no matter what board you are on.
Holla
Serious question: what offensive staff would you like to retain other than Holgerson and Raiola? And specifically state what they did well before Holgerson’s arrival.Whatever bud! You might wanna look in the mirror before start calling anyone anything! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ty Robinson and Nash Hutmacher are the only seniors I think are hard to replace with equivalent or better talent (maybe add Buschini). In some areas I think the younger guys may be less experienced or are a tad less physically developed but will have more athletic potential. Our true freshmen are collectively the best we've had in a long time. We've also seen a lot of improvement and development out of RS freshmen and sophomores. I actually feel really good going into next season with so little talent walking out the door.Rhule saved the program? That’s an interesting conclusion for a 6-5 team. I think it’s more accurate to say Rhule may have saved himself by hiring DH.
But now we’ll see how he hits the portal to upgrade and replace tons of seniors. And perhaps even more important: Will he keep DH as OC and upgrade this coaching staff elsewhere? Wide receiver coaching for sure. Raiola’s very good day would have been exceptional with better receivers who can get open and avoid drops.
Let’s table this topic for at least one year and revisit it.
Anytime I can see a war of words with names like Kakdawg and skullznbonz, it’s a good day.Yeah that's Wyld lol 😂 🤣 (😉 😉)
Believe what you will sir. You know I know. You are still a joke of a poster no matter what board you are on.
Holla
Foley's gotta go, McGuire maybe, keep Satt at TE coach if he'll take the pay cut which I think he will as he's burned his bridge now at 2 serperate P4 schools and proved he's not coordinator material and he knows it and won't ever have another shot at an OC position again with his record and already has a job here. His TEs looked phoenominal Saturday. Donnie also stays as that was the best OL performance we've seen since Pelini as our OL did something Saturday Oregon's OL couldn't do against them was annihiate Wiscy's DL we had over 10 pancake blocks in that game and made that DL of theirs look absolutely stupid. Donnie ain't goin nowhere. This newfound attitude of the coaching staff and players is due to the Holgerson effect as now everything on that side is mirroring Dana's fire and attitude. Dana is the corrdinator we've needed for several years now not only for his offensive prowess, but the cerebral mentaity he's bought to the offense as we haven't seen this type of mentality in at least a decade. Dana's fire has also already spilled over to an already good Blackshirt unit! The Holgerson effect! I just hope he stays on after the year and more than likely he will because of Dylan. What he did for Dylan in a short period of time was changed up his release and delivery. His release is now a rocket release with A LOT of zip on the ball which is something he didn't have when he got here and his check downs are now at lighting speed. See what a few tweaks will do for ya? Rhule can now soley focus on being the CEO only which he shoulda been from day one without having to play a co position coach role.Serious question: what offensive staff would you like to retain other than Holgerson and Raiola? And specifically state what they did well before Holgerson’s arrival.
Whatever bud! You might wanna look in the mirror before start calling anyone anything! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
They may have said they simplified things but I didn't actually see that at all. I think the play calling is maybe plays that are easier for our offense to execute but honestly I believe we're running some of the same offense.I can't help but think back to pre-season pressers and Rhule telling anyone who would listen that they were going to run an offense and call plays as if DR was a Jr. They were not going to water down or simplify the scheme and he would need to learn on the fly. That was a catastrophic misstep by Rhule and Satt. DR was significantly regressing as the season went on and those two coaches REFUSED to help DR by simplifying things. DH comes in, does just that, and now DR looks like he did early on. Jury is most definitely still out on Rhule, getting DH in here was step 1 to fixing things, but he can't afford many more "elite" coaching flub ups.
Holgerson has thrown in some tweaks, buts it’s more of him having the chops to get the opposing D thinking too much whereas Satt just doesn’t seem to have a feel for play calling.They may have said they simplified things but I didn't actually see that at all. I think the play calling is maybe plays that are easier for our offense to execute but honestly I believe we're running some of the same offense.
And a decent OC tweaks a few things virtually every week. Dana said he was going to use Satt’s playbook but it appears he’s changed some of the run block design. I believe we’ve seen very similar plays if not the same plays but the execution is way crisper. Just the timeliness of getting the call to the QB is a big improvement.Holgerson has thrown in some tweaks, buts it’s more of him having the chops to get the opposing D thinking too much whereas Satt just doesn’t seem to have a feel for play calling.
It's kind of hard to describe. DH may be using some of the exact same plays, just with a few sensible tweaks and better choreographed in practice and it just works on Saturdays. Attention to detail and seeing the bigger picture to call the right play in the right situation rather than flipping through the playsheet and picking something at random. There was a play where we had motion to the left, the 2 inside guys ran a mesh concept, and the 2 outside guys ran a wheel and both of the outside guys were wide open and were practically setup to be untouched to the end zone. Dylan went to the right to hit EJ, but he could have just as easily went to the left with the same results. I mean it's just stretching the field both horizontally and vertically to really stretch out the defense and then the motion part of it was perfectly executed as well. I mean it's the difference between having a competent coaching presence and not having one. And the results were very fun and exciting to watch. Which is the first time I could say that about Nebraska football in who knows how long. It's been ages since we've had an exciting offense.And a decent OC tweaks a few things virtually every week. Dana said he was going to use Satt’s playbook but it appears he’s changed some of the run block design. I believe we’ve seen very similar plays if not the same plays but the execution is way crisper. Just the timeliness of getting the call to the QB is a big improvement.
At times earlier this fall I saw Satt run some pretty cool stuff. I really don’t think his playbook was the problem. I saw nearly identical stuff run by NFL teams but he was clearly struggling to get plays in on time. I’m no x’s and 0’s guy but Satt was obviously struggling to call timely plays his team could confidently execute. The redzone execution was light years better Saturday.It's kind of hard to describe. DH may be using some of the exact same plays, just with a few sensible tweaks and better choreographed in practice and it just works on Saturdays. Attention to detail and seeing the bigger picture to call the right play in the right situation rather than flipping through the playsheet and picking something at random. There was a play where we had motion to the left, the 2 inside guys ran a mesh concept, and the 2 outside guys ran a wheel and both of the outside guys were wide open and were practically setup to be untouched to the end zone. Dylan went to the right to hit EJ, but he could have just as easily went to the left with the same results. I mean it's just stretching the field both horizontally and vertically to really stretch out the defense and then the motion part of it was perfectly executed as well. I mean it's the difference between having a competent coaching presence and not having one. And the results were very fun and exciting to watch. Which is the first time I could say that about Nebraska football in who knows how long. It's been ages since we've had an exciting offense.
remember, Satt also had the correct plays drawn up to WIN THE GAME in every loss outside of Indiana. While the games didn't look pretty offensively at times, the plays were there, but either DR had a bad throw, or the receiver dropped the ball. Im not giving Satt a pass at all, I am glad he is no longer calling plays, but these games were not blowouts and with a literally 1 play executed better we have at least 2 more wins.At times earlier this fall I saw Satt run some pretty cool stuff. I really don’t think his playbook was the problem. I saw nearly identical stuff run by NFL teams but he was clearly struggling to get plays in on time. I’m no x’s and 0’s guy but Satt was obviously struggling to call timely plays his team could confidently execute. The redzone execution was light years better Saturday.
The one that really gets me is that our special teams coach struggled to find a guy who could snap the ball on field goal attempts. How many games did it take Foley to figure that one out, if in fact he's the one to have figured it out.This is a point I think is gonna be hard to argue with:
Dana has done a better job in 2 weeks of coaching the QB, the RB's, the WR's, TE's and the OL than the whole fricking 5 offensive coaches combined. That's a fact.
How can I say that? You think all 5 position groups just magically got better in 2 weeks from the same shit the other coaches had been trying to teach them in the last 2 years?
Fvck, if those other position coaches were any good, the OLine would have been playing well, the RB's would have been hitting the holes, the WR's would have been getting separation and blocking the perimeter, and Dylan wouldn't have struggled for the last 5 games.
How did that entire transformation just happen to improve in 2 weeks? It's ALL Dana.
Same personnel, same playbook, same plays, same everything.
It's like we replaced the pitching coach who had his top two pitchers with ERA's of 7.50 a game because he didn't know how to set hitters up, how to pitch backwards and how to have hitters get themselves out. Same stuff on the mound.
So the new pitching coach calls pitches with the same pitchers with the same "stuff" and they have an ERA of 0.50.
It takes a coach with talent to bring out talent.
Baby steps! The goal this year was to become bowl eligible. The problem is the season started off hot and everyone started envisioning possibly making the CFP. The season hit hard times, expectation never dropped back to reality and everyone commenced to bitching about not getting it done.No. I agree. I am happy for the kids and you could see the difference that Dana makes. We finally get to a bowl, but it doesnt hide the fact that we are more than likely going to have an 8th cosecutive losing season ( 6-7 ). That is the real monkey on their back that needs to be removed for Matt's sake.
You mean to go along with our fair catcher on punts? lolThe one that really gets me is that our special teams coach struggled to find a guy who could snap the ball on field goal attempts. How many games did it take Foley to figure that one out, if in fact he's the one to have figured it out.
2nd, kick returns have also been a huge disappointment. Why did it take so long to put a guy back there who could catch and return the ball.
Or DH is calling plays to set up the defense so they are executed better to how they are being defended. Probably a number of things happening.They may have said they simplified things but I didn't actually see that at all. I think the play calling is maybe plays that are easier for our offense to execute but honestly I believe we're running some of the same offense.