Like what? It was 10 to 1 calls in favor of Indiana. Newby knee was down. Your o line was mugging all day and the big punt return was made because of 2 or 3 blocks in the back. End of discussion.Indiana fans have plenty to complain about as well. It evens out.
Like what? It was 10 to 1 calls in favor of Indiana. Newby knee was down. Your o line was mugging all day and the big punt return was made because of 2 or 3 blocks in the back. End of discussion.
Well, give yours then since you interjected it before.Thanks for the objective feedback.
Well, give yours then since you interjected it before.
Indiana had poor line play... so did Nebraska. That evens out. Poor refs that seem one-sided doesn't even out.Mine is as stated. Pointless to debate specific plays on this board, just pointing out that IU fans are complaining as well, but not blaming the loss on zebras. It evens out. Poor line play was the the culprit for IU. Exciting game though and Neb had a good crowd generally well behaved. Looking forward to traveling to Neb.
No, you said they complained, then name it. I seen no calls that really helped Nebraska, and usually there is. So don't try to say something then deflect when called outMine is as stated. Pointless to debate specific plays on this board, just pointing out that IU fans are complaining as well, but not blaming the loss on zebras. It evens out. Poor line play was the the culprit for IU. Exciting game though and Neb had a good crowd generally well behaved. Looking forward to traveling to Neb.
I seen no calls that really helped Nebraska,/QUOTE]
I am not complaining about the officiating (simply saying it generally evens out) and if I were you don't seem like an objective fan to have a discussion with. I am simply saying that fans are alike everywhere and Iu fans are complaining just as you are. Good game...a bounce either way and it might have been different.
Courtsensetwo, what you are complaining about comes down to talent and ability. That's what football is supposed to be about.
What this thread is about is not 2 teams duking it out, with all else being equal. This is about two teams duking it out and one side has the benefit of the refs as well. That's apples and oranges.
I get that Indiana fan might be complaining, but they sure aren't complaining about the officiating, which is what this thread is about.
His knee was down, fraction of a second earlier, it would have been a fumble. It was not inconclusive.Bad calls both ways, it evens out.
Indiana fans would have loved to have a shot with 1:40 left when the Neb kid fumbled. The replay was inconclusive so whatever was called on the field was going to stand. Odd thing is that two...some say three refs signaled fumble while one signaled down. They went with down and the replay was inconclusive so down it is. Personally I am not complaining as it could have gone either way with no objective observer being upset. Some want a push off on at the 50 on the kid that made the circus catch. Some were upset about a perceived faked injury when Diamont has Neb on their heels in the red zone.
I saw uncalled holding on an IU punt return.
Fans whining about officiating is dumb unless it is a single call that changes the outcome at the end...particularly when they win.
His knee was down, fraction of a second earlier, it would have been a fumble. It was not inconclusive.
Bad calls both ways, it evens out.
Indiana fans would have loved to have a shot with 1:40 left when the Neb kid fumbled. The replay was inconclusive so whatever was called on the field was going to stand. Odd thing is that two...some say three refs signaled fumble while one signaled down. They went with down and the replay was inconclusive so down it is. Personally I am not complaining as it could have gone either way with no objective observer being upset. Some want a push off on at the 50 on the kid that made the circus catch. Some were upset about a perceived faked injury when Diamont has Neb on their heels in the red zone.
I saw uncalled holding on an IU punt return.
Fans whining about officiating is dumb unless it is a single call that changes the outcome at the end...particularly when they win.
Sigh...As I suspected. Good game, good luck with the rest of your season.
I believe the Newby play was called properly but thank God the officials on the field called him down and not fumble because if it was called the other way I think they would have said play stands.I thought the refs were pretty awful all day but also found it very ironic that they gave us a good spot on Tommy's QB sneak on 4th and 1 where he dropped the ball and the fumble by Newby later (that could have gone either way) where they called him down before he lost the ball. Whew!
Fans whining about officiating is dumb unless it is a single call that changes the outcome at the end...particularly when they win.
Says the fan of the team that got 90% of the calls on Saturday. And I could not disagree more. Crap officiating at the beginning of the game and in the middle of the game affects the outcome of the game exactly as much as crap officiating at the end of the game.
This is supposed to be a flagship conference, not a high school JV game.
As such, the BIG needs to hold its officiating crews accountable if they suck.
The conference certainly holds players accountable for things like targeting. Whether or not their team loses or whether or not it happens at the end of the game.
We should expect better from the officials than what occurred Sat.
I believe the Newby play was called properly but thank God the officials on the field called him down and not fumble because if it was called the other way I think they would have said play stands.
True but refs are EXTREMELY hesitant to call intentional grounding in the first place. And they have to conference after throwing it when an eligible recievers touched the ball.
On the play it was called i think newby might have been close iirc.
The last part is something people have not mentioned. On the intentional grounding that was called on us, it appeared that Newby was in the area and that call should not have been made against us.
The offensive PI on us was a joke. And it was criminal they didn't flag the IU CB on that second down inside the 5 before the blocked kick...he held down one of Morgan's arms
In my opinion officials KNOW when one team gets called a lot and one doesn't. No doubt in my mind it is POSSIBLE things can "even out" in the fourth quarter, but probably not if the wronged coach acts like a lunatic the first three quarters.Being able to deal with piss poor officiating to eventually get a call to go your way at the end of the game is a skill a coach (a professional) at this level should possess.
Part of it is keeping yourself and your team under control down the stretch. You need to coach and play with that burn and emotion without going over the line. I think our current guy knows where the line is.
The reason for being hesitant for the flag for intentional grounding is due to 'keys' and 'mechanics' of a 7-man crew. The Referee (white hat) has QB and protection of the QB until the play has ended or he's out of harms way. Once that protection has ended he has to then determine if 1) QB was trying to conserve time or yardage and 2) if he's still within the tackle box. If both are true then he has to go to the Head Linesman or Line Judge (both on line of scrimmage) to see 1) if there is an eligible receiver in the area or 2) if it crossed the line of scrimmage. If both are false, then we have a flag for intentional grounding.
By rule, this was Grounding. QB was still inside the tackle box, ball didn't cross the line of scrimmage, and pass was thrown forward to conserve yardage. Newby was about 9-10 yards away from where the ball landed.
Illegal Forward Pass
ARTICLE 2. A forward pass is illegal if:
f. The passer to conserve time throws the ball directly to the ground (1) after the ball has already touched the ground; or (2) not immediately after controlling the ball.
g. The passer to conserve time throws the ball forward into an area where there is no eligible Team A receiver (A.R. 7-3-2-II-VII)
h. The passer to conserve yardage throws the ball forward into an area where there is no eligible Team A receiver (A.R. 7-3-2-I).
[Exception: It is not a foul if the passer is or has been outside the tackle box and throws the ball so that it crosses or lands beyond the neutral zone or neutral zone extended (Rule 2-19-3) (A.R. 7-3-2-VIII-X). This applies only to the player who controls the snap or the resulting backward pass and retains possession before throwing the forward pass.]
PENALTY [f-h]—Loss of down at the spot of the foul [S36 and S9].
So I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt... but you seem to lack objectivity here just as you are accusing husker fan of lacking objectivity.Lol, No objective discussion allowed here...no sir. I just love the sense of entitlement. Your team was very fortunate to win an exciting game. Show some class.
It went both ways, sobbing about the officiating is such a losers game. Smh
Just re-watched the non-fumble by Newby. Anybody who says that call was questionable is not being objective. Several camera angles show that his knee was CLEARLY down prior to him losing possession of the ball. Saying otherwise shows nothing but bias.
So I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt... but you seem to lack objectivity here just as you are accusing husker fan of lacking objectivity.
Husker fans have been pointing out play after play where the refs threw the flag against us. 10/1 flags against Huskers/Hoosiers. Most objective fans of college football would recognize the disparity here... but you don't.
Maybe you are the one not being very objective, and on a Husker board no less.
My advice? Know your audience. And don't be surprised if Husker fans might be miffed at your smugness in this thread.
Edit: and I can be just as smug... let me try...
You team was very fortunate to even be in a position to win this exciting game. 17-0 to start before we let you back in.
See how silly I sound? Apply it to yourself now. Smugness doesn't work well on opposing fan's boards.
Lol, No objective discussion allowed here...no sir. I just love the sense of entitlement. Your team was very fortunate to win an exciting game. Show some class.
It went both ways, sobbing about the officiating is such a losers game. Smh
Right back at ya.
So if the refs had managed to hand you guys the game and we were complaining about crap officiating after the loss...... then what?
My "sense of entitlement" includes expecting referees to call holding when a DT is being tackled in front of a ref when that same ref has called holding on Nebraska earlier in the game. If you think that's wrong, so be it. Accepting that kind of crap leads to more of it.
Feel free to provide some objective discussion anytime. There's no rule against it.
Read my posts again. Never expected this nonsense from Husker Nation. Disappointing.
Quit being an ass. You come to this board and accuse us of being unreasonable because we can't see how even the game was. Officiating was bad but you counter with the one call where they got it right (your words: not a bad call at all) and how we were fortunate to get that call.Read my posts again. Never expected this nonsense from Husker Nation. Disappointing.
Quit being an ass. You come to this board and accuse us of being unreasonable because we can't see how even the game was. Officiating was bad but you counter with the one call where they got it right (your words: not a bad call at all) and how we were fortunate to get that call.
And then all you do is be smug and "disappointed" in Husker fans for telling you the officiating was bad.
You lost in spite of the refs. Deal with it on your own board. If you can't come over here and show some respect, this is the treatment you will get.
According to Section 3, Article 4, Paragraph d. - Defensive players may not use hands and arms to tackle, hold or otherwise illegally obstruct an opponent other than a runner.
Not that I have ever seen it called before.
Great response. Say what you mean.Lol...reading comprehension much?
That's just it. When in your lifetime have you ever seen a defensive lineman trying to hold on to an OLineman? They are trying to get around OLineman, not hang on to them.