Why you continue to believe that intangibles such as motivation, heart, etc overcomes talent is beyond me. Anecdotally it has been shown time and again to only have a minimal impact. Did you watch how Clemson just shredded a very well coached team in VT? Have you not seen how Urban tore up Saban’s team and then suddenly fell back to the pack once they lost tremendous talent on both sides of the ball? Scheme and plan are only about 20% at most, the rest is a series of 1:1 battles about talent.
Nebraska won championships 20 years ago with difference making talent and great coaching moves. Funny thing though as we had a glimpse into this, when we went a QB like Turman, if coaching trumps talent you wouldn’t have seen a difference, yet the offense was far less explosive.
It is no coincidence that the last guy had his moist success when Callahan’s best recruits were upperclassmen. We dropped off the face of the earth in talent between 2010 and 2012.
Maybe this is something you can relate to, if you are a world renowned baker and you are gonna bake a cake, you aren’t gonna be using subpar flour and lead tainted sugar, because while they don’t comprise the whole cake they are still a big part of it. An average baker with clean sugar and top of the line flour is going to do a better job than you because they have better quality starting materials.
The reality is that coaching “failures” in college football are 9:1 based on the talent and depth recruited.