ADVERTISEMENT

For anyone who hasn't figured out the problem yet

I keep dunking on you and you keep coming back for more.

2021 -Giveaways per game - Rank
NU - #71
SC - #123

2022
NU - #83
SC - #119

2023 Satt leaves SC and goes to NU
NU - #133
SC - #26

Source
How about you break down the fumbles in 2022. Is there something about his offense that results in more than usual fumbles?
 
Dumb calls were definitely made but they had little bearing on the overall W-L of the season.

You guys focus on scratches and not the gushing open wounds.

You aren't serious people.
Nobody is saying we don’t need better players

Everybody is saying that we need better coaching in addition

Which is as obvious a conclusion based on evidence as has ever existed

If track record is any indication, Satterfield won’t change. Because people generally don’t change.
 
Nobody is saying we don’t need better players

Everybody is saying that we need better coaching in addition

Which is as obvious a conclusion based on evidence as has ever existed

If track record is any indication, Satterfield won’t change. Because people generally don’t change.
I'd like to see him 3-4 years into his system.
3 years at Temple
2 years at USC
 
Nobody is saying we don’t need better players

Everybody is saying that we need better coaching in addition

Which is as obvious a conclusion based on evidence as has ever existed

If track record is any indication, Satterfield won’t change. Because people generally don’t change.
Can we start by changing out players whom turn the ball over at will first ? That we be the common sense thing to do.
 
Nobody is saying we don’t need better players

Everybody is saying that we need better coaching in addition

Which is as obvious a conclusion based on evidence as has ever existed

If track record is any indication, Satterfield won’t change. Because people generally don’t change.
We have more than enough data points on Satt. His teams turn the ball over at an alarming rate and don’t score very often.
 
I'd like to see him 3-4 years into his system.
3 years at Temple
2 years at USC
Both years at USC led SEC in turnovers

Temple was a different era of college football. Aren’t you the one who laughed at G5 comparisons, anyway?

Also - you’d think someone who’s intelligent would find their way out of Kansas. But what do I know.
 
Spencer Rattler is an AWFUL QB and was a turnover machine at OU too.
There’s one constant in all those turnover riddled season, friend, and it ain’t the QBs

Glad you made it home in the weather
 
LOL - for anyone who hasn’t figured it out yet - do you know how bad the coaching job, taken in total, has to be to have the #1 rushing offense in the conference and a top 15 national defense and win only 5 games with the softest schedule in modern program history?

You give any other coaching staff in America that combination plus our schedule and they get bowl eligible blindfolded
 
Last edited:
Both years at USC led SEC in turnovers

Temple was a different era of college football. Aren’t you the one who laughed at G5 comparisons, anyway?

Also - you’d think someone who’s intelligent would find their way out of Kansas. But what do I know.
You are missing the point and trying to use a red herring. I simple stated that I want to see what a fully integrated system looks like with Satt. Not sure what G5 has to do with anything.

I looked at the 2022 season and the RBs, WRs, and TE fumbled the ball quite a bit. Not sure how that is an OC thing. Rattler transferred for a reason.
 
You are missing the point and trying to use a red herring. I simple stated that I want to see what a fully integrated system looks like with Satt. Not sure what G5 has to do with anything.

I looked at the 2022 season and the RBs, WRs, and TE fumbled the ball quite a bit. Not sure how that is an OC thing. Rattler transferred for a reason.
This is sad to watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bruce1981
Just watch these highlights to get an idea of how South Carolina was last year.

What's your point with these highlights in a loss? We know michigan relayed signals to SC for their games with Tennessee and Clemson. They went from scoring 6 against Florida one week to beating 2 playoff contenders at the snap of a finger. That was the only game Florida held an opponent to single digits last year. They gave up 29 points a game. Lol Satterfield is a fraud and a bum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TampaBaySkers
What's your point with these highlights in a loss? We know michigan relayed signals to SC for their games with Tennessee and Clemson. They went from scoring 6 against Florida one week to beating 2 playoff contenders at the snap of a finger. That was the only game Florida held an opponent to single digits last year. They gave up 29 points a game. Lol Satterfield is a fraud and a bum.
The point is that the turnovers had nothing to do with the play calling. SC isn't some amazing program.
 
I know. You guys can't stay on point and fail to understand nuance.
SC was 8-5 last season. 5-7 this year, after Satt left. Winners win, right?
Ah yes. Nuance.. a term stupid people use to try to sound smart.

I was on point, then you posted fake numbers. I dunked on you twice, and now you’re desperately trying to change the subject.
 
What bullshit. We should have won at least 7 games this year. I am not going to call this year a success. The day ANY Husker fan calls a 5 win season a success is a sad day
Careful or you’ll have the board moron chime in and say you aren’t even a Nebraska fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bruce1981
Here you go. It's as ugly as you'd expect.

Total Offense​
Total Defense​
Final Record​
08/31/23​
L 10-13​
122​
59​
5​
7​
09/09/23​
L 14-36​
80​
126​
4​
8​
09/16/23​
W 35-11​
77​
22​
6​
6​
09/23/23​
W 28-14​
66​
108​
3​
9​
09/30/23​
L 7-45​
57​
2​
12​
0​
10/06/23​
W 20-7​
60​
63​
5​
7​
10/21/23​
W 17-9​
121​
43​
7​
5​
10/28/23​
W 31-14​
68​
68​
4​
8​
11/04/23​
L 17-20​
125​
78​
4​
8​
11/11/23​
L 10-13​
58​
34​
7​
5​
11/18/23​
L 17-24​
75​
31​
7​
5​
11/24/23​
Iowa
L 10-13​
130​
7​
10​
2​
Yikes...that's worse than I thought. I wasn't impressed with Michigan (Nebraska completely sh*t themselves in that game) and that 57th ranked offense confirms why.
 
Ah yes. Nuance.. a term stupid people use to try to sound smart.

I was on point, then you posted fake numbers. I dunked on you twice, and now you’re desperately trying to change the subject.
South Carolina in:
2020 was 2-8.
2021 was 6-7 (Satt's first year)
2022 was 8-5 (Satt's 2nd year)
Satt leaves
2023 was 5-7

According to you homers' logic, Satt was responsible for their improvement. See, nuance is necessary but you don't like to be honest but rather get your dildo studded pitchforks. You are what is wrong with Nebraska football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyLvr
I don't want to take anything away from Tony White, BUT what were each of our opponents ranked in Total Offense?
It’s incredibly remarkable when you consider how many three and outs our offense handed to the defense. When they did their job and needed a rest, our offense, but mostly our quarterbacks, let them down game after game week after week..
 
The point is that the turnovers had nothing to do with the play calling. SC isn't some amazing program.
The snap hitting the motion man after several near misses was at least one play call that had something to do with a turnover

Same with calling an identical route combo at an identical spot against Maryland that was an identical INT against minn
 
With the easiest sschedule in our history..lol
I guess that helps explain: Northwestern hired an assistant coach from NDSU this year for peanuts and made him HC this Fall when Fitzgerald was suddenly fired. The result was a team that was 1-11 last year is 7-5 and bowl bound. We were 4-8 last year and 5-7 this year with the latest high priced savior as HC.

Oh well, both coaches will no longer have cupcake schedules starting next year. It will be fun to compare their future success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrs.Jeans15
The snap hitting the motion man after several near misses was at least one play call that had something to do with a turnover

Same with calling an identical route combo at an identical spot against Maryland that was an identical INT against minn
You talking about Sims? The Sims?

Did Purdy turn the ball over against Minnesota? The routes weren't remotely similar. 2 completely different scenarios and just shows how they can't seem to know from week to week how any of their poor QBs will perform, or even the offense at large.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT