Are you saying SE doesn't have the cojones to fire Miles? If SE had the backbone to fire Pelini, firing Miles will be a breeze.
This is a well-put post and actually thought out and fair. Good work.I know my opinion is not valued as I was a staunch supporter of Miles which is extremely unpopular now. That said, I wonder if bringing in a new coach at this point would actually open the floodgates further. It's crazy how the departure of one player who arguably wasn't the best player returning can do so much damage.
I honestly don't know what to do at this point.
Eichorst went on the record saying he's coming back, so if he changes his mind now it appears as though a 20 year old can change his mind.
However if he keeps him, he's showing he's a little tone deaf to the exodus of talent from the team.
He really is in a tough spot. I think next year football and men's basketball will ultimately determine Eichorst's future. If both are average or below I don't see what he can show as a sign that the program is on the right track.
Firing Pelini was easy. Bo was so polarizing. Not firing Miles is about being lazy, shows how little concern SE has for the basketball team, but mostly it is about saving money.
There's just as strong an argument that it could close the floodgates. But that said, the only way Miles gets fired this spring is if there is some big-splash hire lined up that will be a no-brainer, we-had-to-stop-the-bleeding, grand slam home run. I put the chances of that at 0.0%I know my opinion is not valued as I was a staunch supporter of Miles which is extremely unpopular now. That said, I wonder if bringing in a new coach at this point would actually open the floodgates further. It's crazy how the departure of one player who arguably wasn't the best player returning can do so much damage.
We'll have to agree to disagree. At the time firing Bo was difficult because Bo never had a losing season or won less than 9 games. It wasn't until more time passed that people on the fence realized letting Bo go was a good move.Firing Pelini was easy. Bo was so polarizing. Not firing Miles is about being lazy, shows how little concern SE has for the basketball team, but mostly it is about saving money.
Firing Pelini was easy. Bo was so polarizing. Not firing Miles is about being lazy, shows how little concern SE has for the basketball team, but mostly it is about saving money.
All of his offensive rebounding didn't do anything to give the team second and third chances to score?Our offense has nothing to do with a guy that has middle school dribbling and shooting ability.
Shhhh. That kind of hustle and effort does not matter. Unless it is a meaningless empty effort play on defense. That kind of hustle will earn you umlimited pt.All of his offensive rebounding didn't do anything to give the team second and third chances to score?
One more year is one year closer to the athletic department not having to pay Bo Pelini. That's the only conclusion I can come to.
Or if you're an Eddie Floorburn with good hair. Then it doesn't matter if you can't shoot or dribble, you can absolutely kill it at the 4 spot.Shhhh. That kind of hustle and effort does not matter. Unless it is a meaningless empty effort play on defense. That kind of hustle will earn you umlimited pt.
Boehm and Molinari both.But I see no downside whatsoever to finally handing Boehm a cardboard box for his personal belongings, to see if a change at that level will help right the ship.
In case you hadn't noticed we pretty much lost to everyone after he came back too....the team had obviously mailed it in and just wanted the season to end.So how did we beat Maryland and Indiana with Morrow playing 35+ minutes? Then, when Morrow gets hurt, we lose to nearly everyone?
That's a sign of great coaching.In case you hadn't noticed we pretty much lost to everyone after he came back too....the team had obviously mailed it in and just wanted the season to end.
It appeared pretty obvious to me that his team quit on him. Is that his fault? Clearly the lynch mob would say it's all on him.That's a sign of great coaching.
IF he really wants to play the wing like he says, he may have to go to D3 or a Juco.....Poor Ed. He better hook up with a team quickly because he's rapidly becoming a Division 3 player right before our eyes.
Probably so, since he couldn't even crack the starting lineup for next year's Huskers and that's clearly the reason he's transferring.*IF he really wants to play the wing like he says, he may have to go to D3 or a Juco.....
He might not have been the starter next year or he might have gotten the seniority start only to play less minutes than Jordy. IMO, at the end of the year, Jordy was a better player and deserved more minutes than Ed.Probably so, since he couldn't even crack the starting lineup for next year's Huskers and that's clearly the reason he's transferring.*
*DISCLAIMER: there's absolutely no evidence that this is actually the case, but it's being bloviated.repeatedly and therefore must be true.
We'll have to agree to disagree. At the time firing Bo was difficult because Bo never had a losing season or won less than 9 games. It wasn't until more time passed that people on the fence realized letting Bo go was a good move.
If your statement about SE and the basketball program is true, then Miles job is safe after next season too. It won't be unless Miles has a stellar season.
It appeared pretty obvious to me that his team quit on him. Is that his fault? Clearly the lynch mob would say it's all on him.
DISCLAIMER: there's absolutely no evidence that this is actually the case, but it's being bloviated.repeatedly and therefore must be true.
Do you? I think he should've been canned.Huh? Do you just like to write stuff for the sake of writing stuff? I will make it simple. Miles is a mediocre coach. Players depart his program on a regular basis. He has never shown that he can put three good seasons in a row. I don't understand any Nebraska fan who would support Tim Miles. His teams have been pretty much dismal except for one year when the Huskers were 19-13.
Is it always a coach's fault for losing? No. Is the coach always responsible for losses? Yes!
I'm not as high on Taylor as you are, but at least he showed up for the Big Ten Tournament and, with the possible exception of Tschimanga, he was the one guy who didn't just phone it in the last two weeks of the season. Despite his athletic limitations, Taylor was also probably the Huskers' best perimeter defender simply because he took that job somewhat seriously.Well I'll try to be a glass half full guy for a moment.
Watson's game should continue to improve especially now that he will be the go to player next season.
Taylor looked to have one of the purest shots on the team and would be nice if he can step his game up.
Jordy improved more over the course of the season than anyone and he has the potential to be a 10-8 guy.
As much as Jacobson gets a bad rap he's a solid player who contributes on the glass and can score a bit.
Gill was supposed to have potential. Didn't see much of it but maybe he finds his game.
Roby is maybe the most athletic on the team and maybe he gets more comfortable.
Copeland has an NBA body and can score. Let's see how fast he can get in a groove.
I know I'm grasping but I try to look on the positive side of things.
In case you hadn't noticed, we beat Maryland and Indiana with Morrow playing 35+ minutes.In case you hadn't noticed we pretty much lost to everyone after he came back too....the team had obviously mailed it in and just wanted the season to end.