ADVERTISEMENT

2024 football schedule release on Big Ten.

Eh, chicken and egg I guess. Our downward spiral correlates perfectly with our move. I don't think it's a coincidence.
I think Nebraska would have definitely benefited more from going to the SEC.

Even the projections of payouts, which is so highly touted around here, and so disappointing, in the SEC are going to be more than the big ten.

When Missouri was courting the big ten and the big 12 south was threatening to go the pac, Nebraska should have just flipped the peace sign and asked the SEC if we could apply.

What a baller move that would have been.

Pun intended.
 
I think Nebraska would have definitely benefited more from going to the SEC.

Even the projections of payouts, which is so highly touted around here, and so disappointing, in the SEC are going to be more than the big ten.

When Missouri was courting the big ten and the big 12 south was threatening to go the pac, Nebraska should have just flipped the peace sign and asked the SEC if we could apply.

What a baller move that would have been.

Pun intended.
Someone brought this up on Reddit. Note the responses. Particularly from Husker fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
If we would have won more under Riley and Frost the past 8 years no one would given it a thought about being in the SEC by now no one would have given a thought about uterus and OU moving away from the Big 12 and joining the SEC..

Winning fixes everything and we haven’t won squat lately..
 
If we would have won more under Riley and Frost the past 8 years no one would given it a thought about being in the SEC by now no one would have given a thought about uterus and OU moving away from the Big 12 and joining the SEC..

Winning fixes everything and we haven’t won squat lately..
I'd want it more. win or lose, we are in AAA while the SEC is the majors.

all the money & relative losing of our fellow B1G members has softened our landing, IMO, and made our current state much more acceptable to many (most?)

we have people now admitting gladly how happy they'll be with 6 goddamn wins

what a joke!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BleedRed78
Someone brought this up on Reddit. Note the responses. Particularly from Husker fans.
You got Cliff's notes that are opposing and relevant? I just don't have the time for other forums. This one is enough.

I KNOW recruiting would be better.

I KNOW the payouts in the SEC would be better.

I KNOW playing football would not have been a scarlet letter in 2020 with the SEC.

I KNOW there wouldn't be arrogant and sophomoric decisions like "legends" and "leaders". Considering coaches punching players on the field and then still idolized, butt diddling of minors by coaches, doctors getting overly digital with the physicals and without consent, coaches having sleep overs AFTER ALL THAT CRAP! Good gravy it's like the big ten has this incessant urge to do something perverted and call themselves elite, visionary, and preeminent. ---and big fans call us arrogant

I KNOW they wouldn't do something stupid like take teams from 2 time zones away.

I KNOW I could go on.



In any case, I'm a nobody and I am just one opinion.
 
I'd want it more. win or lose, we are in AAA while the SEC is the majors.

all the money & relative losing of our fellow B1G members has softened our landing, IMO, and made our current state much more acceptable to many (most?)

we have people now admitting gladly how happy they'll be with 6 goddamn wins

what a joke!
Only you who has the issues with it…
 
Only you who has the issues with it…
that's because you and everyone else have turned soft & forgotten what championship level competition looks like

go back to 1999 and rekindle your B1G thoughts if you're able

they should never have changed

I take pity on you all & am ashamed to share my Husker fandom with you B1G apologists. you're part of the problem!
 
You got Cliff's notes that are opposing and relevant? I just don't have the time for other forums. This one is enough.

I KNOW recruiting would be better.

I KNOW the payouts in the SEC would be better.

I KNOW playing football would not have been a scarlet letter in 2020 with the SEC.

I KNOW there wouldn't be arrogant and sophomoric decisions like "legends" and "leaders". Considering coaches punching players on the field and then still idolized, butt diddling of minors by coaches, doctors getting overly digital with the physicals and without consent, coaches having sleep overs AFTER ALL THAT CRAP! Good gravy it's like the big ten has this incessant urge to do something perverted and call themselves elite, visionary, and preeminent. ---and big fans call us arrogant

I KNOW they wouldn't do something stupid like take teams from 2 time zones away.

I KNOW I could go on.



In any case, I'm a nobody and I am just one opinion.
you're 100% correct, @Sinomatic

don't let the bleating sheep - who are consistently wrong about everything - dissuade you
 
At a minimum if we were in the SEC we could at least chant S-E-C! S-E-C! because the teams that were carrying our water were winning championships.

The teams that are carrying our water in the BIG are a bunch of also rans on the national stage
 
  • Love
Reactions: king_kong_
that's because you and everyone else have turned soft & forgotten what championship level competition looks like

go back to 1999 and rekindle your B1G thoughts if you're able

they should never have changed

I take pity on you all & am ashamed to share my Husker fandom with you B1G apologists. you're part of the problem!
They changed when uterus was running the show and were looking some where else like the PAC 10( bet you forgot all the underlying stuff that was going on in the late 2000) why do you think AtM and Mizzou left not to mention Colorado..

U of Nebraska made the right decision joining the Big 10 conference, we haven’t lived up to our expectations joining this league so let Rhule start helping us climb the mountain like Devaney did.

U of Nebraska made the right move.It’s time to start climbing that mountain
 
They changed when uterus was running the show and were looking some where else like the PAC 10( bet you forgot all the underlying stuff that was going on in the late 2000) why do you think AtM and Mizzou left not to mention Colorado..

U of Nebraska made the right decision joining the Big 10 conference, we haven’t lived up to our expectations joining this league so let Rhule start helping us climb the mountain like Devaney did.

U of Nebraska made the right move.It’s time to start climbing that mountain
I never feared Texas the way you did

we ran the north, they ran the south

the B1G butt kissing that takes place around here is embarrassing. never thought I'd see the day Nebraska fans would bootlick the lamest conference in the country.

we took the bag way, way too early
 
They changed when uterus was running the show and were looking some where else like the PAC 10( bet you forgot all the underlying stuff that was going on in the late 2000) why do you think AtM and Mizzou left not to mention Colorado..

U of Nebraska made the right decision joining the Big 10 conference, we haven’t lived up to our expectations joining this league so let Rhule start helping us climb the mountain like Devaney did.

U of Nebraska made the right move.It’s time to start climbing that mountain
Shoulder checking Missouri out of our way into the front doors the big ten could definitely be seen as the 2nd best move.

But...

The alternative to not going to the big ten and not going to the SEC would be staying pat and TCU did not get snubbed for a playoff bid by being in the big 12.

You could argue that staying in the big 12 would have been just as good as going to the big was. The payout in the big 12 might not be as much. But if they were able to get BYU, Utah, AZ, ASU, and CU then that conference with Nebraska in it seems much much better and the payout I could not see being worse. Only Nebraska would be the premier team. And arguably have the recruiting advantage within that footprint.

With Nebraska in the b12 right now. I could see those Arizona schools and Utah schools sliding on over easily.

Then...after all that....Imagine the b12 with Washington instead of UCF. Oregon instead of Cincinati.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scarletred
Shoulder checking Missouri out of our way into the front doors the big ten could definitely be seen as the 2nd best move.

But...

The alternative to not going to the big ten and not going to the SEC would be staying pat and TCU did not get snubbed for a playoff bid by being in the big 12.

You could argue that staying in the big 12 would have been just as good as going to the big was. The payout in the big 12 might not be as much. But if they were able to get BYU, Utah, AZ, ASU, and CU then that conference with Nebraska in it seems much much better and the payout I could not see being worse. Only Nebraska would be the premier team. And arguably have the recruiting advantage within that footprint.

With Nebraska in the b12 right now. I could see those Arizona schools and Utah schools sliding on over easily.

Then...after all that....Imagine the b12 with Washington instead of UCF. Oregon instead of Cincinati.
Good points..
But I’m glad TO seen the opportunity joining a conference that was more stable and financially was a no brainer..
Four schools left for the same reason and let’s face it OU and uterus are stuck to the hip..

Wishing the SEC would invite us and then being left at the altar with all of these people thinking we should have stuck around the stayed in the Big 12 are very delusional..

B1G was the first to expand beyond the footprint that’s how the SEC grabbed ut and OU..
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
You got Cliff's notes that are opposing and relevant? I just don't have the time for other forums. This one is enough.

I KNOW recruiting would be better.

I KNOW the payouts in the SEC would be better.

I KNOW playing football would not have been a scarlet letter in 2020 with the SEC.

I KNOW there wouldn't be arrogant and sophomoric decisions like "legends" and "leaders". Considering coaches punching players on the field and then still idolized, butt diddling of minors by coaches, doctors getting overly digital with the physicals and without consent, coaches having sleep overs AFTER ALL THAT CRAP! Good gravy it's like the big ten has this incessant urge to do something perverted and call themselves elite, visionary, and preeminent. ---and big fans call us arrogant

I KNOW they wouldn't do something stupid like take teams from 2 time zones away.

I KNOW I could go on.



In any case, I'm a nobody and I am just one opinion.
No cliffs. I posted a link. You can read it or not. Up to you.

I will however, give my own thoughts on what you said.

On recruiting. Yeah, that would be an improvement. Although that really hasn't helped Missouri all that much. Granted, Missouri is not Nebraska, but the idea that moving to the SEC would make you better because of recruiting and competition is not necessarily the case, unless your school is already in the south. Missouri has straight up disappeared. They were far better in the Big 12.

On payout. No. Not even close. You can say what you want about the B1G (and I've said a lot myself) but they lap the field when it comes to media negotiations. Especially once the LA schools join, those numbers are only going to increase. The SEC has a superior product on the field. But the networks really only care about eyeballs. And nobody in the nation has bigger fanbases and alumni bases than the Big Ten. Which means more money for NU. Hopefully they actually do something with it, instead of losing to Purdue and Minnesota.

SEC coaches are not only arrogant and sophomoric, but are cutthroat. Husker fans would be in for a rude awakening when they take their plains states sensibilities and values down south. That southern hospitality does not extend to football. If you are only looking through the prism of politics and stupidass culture wars, then yeah, you might think the SEC "is a better cultural fit." But you might want to look closer. That's something that actually was pointed out in that Reddit thread. Nebraska and the south are nothing alike culturally.

On not taking teams from two time zones away. Well, yeah. That's because there is no benefit for them to do so. The best football and the best talent in the country are all within their geographic footprint. What do they stand to gain by trying to poach Oregon or Washington? Dilute their brand? They already did that by taking Missouri.

On actually winning games. This is a big one for me. Nebraska is 18-35 since the Big Ten West was formed. That is wholly embarrassing. Northwestern has had more relevance than NU in the conference.

And that record is against bad teams. We're talking the worst division in P5 football. If you think that somehow playing in the nation's toughest conference (the SEC) would improve Nebraska's record then I have some swamp land in Florida to sell you.

Oklahoma better get used to being everyone's homecoming game very quickly. But hey, at least they'll be getting boatraced by Alabama, Georgia and LSU instead of Wisconsin, Minnesota and Illinois.
 
I never feared Texas the way you did

we ran the north, they ran the south

the B1G butt kissing that takes place around here is embarrassing. never thought I'd see the day Nebraska fans would bootlick the lamest conference in the country.

we took the bag way, way too early
Had TO waited...NU would have been joining the SEC next year, we would all have giant erections, the money-boys could still brag about the money and we would not be opening up on a Thursday night vs Minny, a game that a might end up with more husker fans at the game than gopher fans.

The recruiting footprint would change for the better and Vandy would have been the only "lame" game, not that all the teams in the SEC are great but they are enjoyable and seem to love football.

I suppose the road games would suck in terms of attending them but I would trade that for the Big Ten.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sinomatic
No cliffs. I posted a link. You can read it or not. Up to you.

I will however, give my own thoughts on what you said.

On recruiting. Yeah, that would be an improvement. Although that really hasn't helped Missouri all that much. Granted, Missouri is not Nebraska, but the idea that moving to the SEC would make you better because of recruiting and competition is not necessarily the case, unless your school is already in the south. Missouri has straight up disappeared. They were far better in the Big 12.

On payout. No. Not even close. You can say what you want about the B1G (and I've said a lot myself) but they lap the field when it comes to media negotiations. Especially once the LA schools join, those numbers are only going to increase. The SEC has a superior product on the field. But the networks really only care about eyeballs. And nobody in the nation has bigger fanbases and alumni bases than the Big Ten. Which means more money for NU. Hopefully they actually do something with it, instead of losing to Purdue and Minnesota.

SEC coaches are not only arrogant and sophomoric, but are cutthroat. Husker fans would be in for a rude awakening when they take their plains states sensibilities and values down south. That southern hospitality does not extend to football. If you are only looking through the prism of politics and stupidass culture wars, then yeah, you might think the SEC "is a better cultural fit." But you might want to look closer. That's something that actually was pointed out in that Reddit thread. Nebraska and the south are nothing alike culturally.

On not taking teams from two time zones away. Well, yeah. That's because there is no benefit for them to do so. The best football and the best talent in the country are all within their geographic footprint. What do they stand to gain by trying to poach Oregon or Washington? Dilute their brand? They already did that by taking Missouri.

On actually winning games. This is a big one for me. Nebraska is 18-35 since the Big Ten West was formed. That is wholly embarrassing. Northwestern has had more relevance than NU in the conference.

And that record is against bad teams. We're talking the worst division in P5 football. If you think that somehow playing in the nation's toughest conference (the SEC) would improve Nebraska's record then I have some swamp land in Florida to sell you.

Oklahoma better get used to being everyone's homecoming game very quickly. But hey, at least they'll be getting boatraced by Alabama, Georgia and LSU instead of Wisconsin, Minnesota and Illinois.
So for the win. Just read your last 2 sentences. haha The rest of what came before that doesn't matter to me.

I'd rather see Nebraska lose to teams with on the field chops AND don't get themselves involved with the sick shamelessly out of the closet in the cesspool stuff going on up in the big 10 conference. Just that stuff alone should put everyone stomach on purge when the words BIG TEN come rolling out of their mouths.

Addressing the money war, it isn't even over yet. There is still the ACC to go after in the coming years and I can only imagine those schools might lean more south instead of north. The SEC is going to have their pick of the most beneficial to the conference.

Multi and older generation Americans are heading south newer and newer immigrants are heading north. Not sure American football is going to be the king of sports up north if that trend continues. My guess is soccer becomes more and more important the longer immigration and time move on.

The long game favors the SEC and quite heavily from what I see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
Yeah, THAT’S the reason Iowa is mentioned in nearly every thread. Not because it’s a rivalry where both sides despise each other.
despise each other so much we marry into each other's families and start threads about how happy we are to see the other side win?
 
Has anybody here ever seen an iowa fan and a Nebraska fan get into a fist fight?
 
No but I've been damn close. We have a Hawkeye/Husker party every year. I have been too close at rumbling with a cockeye alum, retiree teacher and my moms best friend. She gets awfully mouthy
First of all, hilarious post

Second, you have an annual party for the game and both fan bases are invited?

Lol

Imagine doing this with CU? Wouldnt last 10 minutes
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walleye79
First of all, hilarious post

Second, you have an annual party for the game and both fan bases are invited?

Lol

Imagine doing this with CU? Wouldnt last 10 minutes
Oh yeah. I think it can only happen for the simple fact we grew up and we're close with this family. I finally got a little retribution this year though. And it felt damn good.
 
Oh yeah. I think it can only happen for the simple fact we grew up and we're close with this family. I finally got a little retribution this year though. And it felt damn good.
eh

I really don't think any Nebraska fan despises iowa fans just for the simple fact they're iowa fans

I'm willing to bet there will be zero anecdotes of NU/iowa fan fights in response to my question

a regular occurrence when actual rivals who despise each other play (us vs CU, us vs UT, etc)
 
No but I've been damn close. We have a Hawkeye/Husker party every year. I have been too close at rumbling with a cockeye alum, retiree teacher and my moms best friend. She gets awfully mouthy
If you do fight her, just be careful not to let her kick you in the balls. That’s the only advantage that a woman has in a fight with a man.
 
that's because you and everyone else have turned soft & forgotten what championship level competition looks like

go back to 1999 and rekindle your B1G thoughts if you're able

they should never have changed

I take pity on you all & am ashamed to share my Husker fandom with you B1G apologists. you're part of the problem!
I've always been outspoken about playing tougher schedules. When I was a kid in the 80s and 90s, Nebraska would frequently play tough OOC schedules. When NU joined the Big Ten, I was against a geographic split for the divisions. I wanted competitive balance. I wanted NU to play Michigan and Ohio State every year. But most Husker fans on here wanted Iowa as a "rival" (they are not a rival) and a geographic split that would see Nebraska playing the worst schools in the conference.

And that's the rub. Winning matters.

You bring up the way Husker fans used to be. Like going back to 1999. Well, yeah, in 1999 Nebraska was still one of the top programs in the country. It was fresh off of winning three national championships in four years. They won their last conference championship in 1999 and beat Tennessee in the Fiesta Bowl, going 12 - 1. Back then Nebraska destroyed the Big Ten (and the SEC). So we all made fun of them.

That's not the case now. Upon entering the conference, NU hasn't done anything but lose to Wisconsin and then get pushed around by powerhouses like Purdue and Minnesota. If you're gonna talk smack about the conference, that's fine. But at least win the damn thing every once in a while. Hell, be competitive in it. Don't be an afterthought on the field. Don't be Indiana's homecoming game.

Context matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Landomatic
I'm shocked at how out of touch people are with reality. The Big 10 was the only conference that wanted us. The Big 12 didn't want us. The SEC didn't want us. ACC? Nope. Pac 12? No way.

Shocking I know, but all these so-called friends in the Big 12 didn't actually like us. In fact, most hated us with a burning passion.

So maybe we should sit around and cry for the Big 8. Or come up reasons we should have gone to the NFL. It makes about as much sense.
 
Does anyone else think this scheduling will just comeback to bite the BIG in the a$$? I think it will just make it harder to get a BIG team in the CFP. While the SEC will find themselves with two teams in it year after year.
 
I've always been outspoken about playing tougher schedules. When I was a kid in the 80s and 90s, Nebraska would frequently play tough OOC schedules. When NU joined the Big Ten, I was against a geographic split for the divisions. I wanted competitive balance. I wanted NU to play Michigan and Ohio State every year. But most Husker fans on here wanted Iowa as a "rival" (they are not a rival) and a geographic split that would see Nebraska playing the worst schools in the conference.

And that's the rub. Winning matters.

You bring up the way Husker fans used to be. Like going back to 1999. Well, yeah, in 1999 Nebraska was still one of the top programs in the country. It was fresh off of winning three national championships in four years. They won their last conference championship in 1999 and beat Tennessee in the Fiesta Bowl, going 12 - 1. Back then Nebraska destroyed the Big Ten (and the SEC). So we all made fun of them.

That's not the case now. Upon entering the conference, NU hasn't done anything but lose to Wisconsin and then get pushed around by powerhouses like Purdue and Minnesota. If you're gonna talk smack about the conference, that's fine. But at least win the damn thing every once in a while. Hell, be competitive in it. Don't be an afterthought on the field. Don't be Indiana's homecoming game.

Context matters.
if your attitude is only such during the good times, you, sir, are a front runner/fair weather fan
 
If we would have won more under Riley and Frost the past 8 years no one would given it a thought about being in the SEC by now no one would have given a thought about uterus and OU moving away from the Big 12 and joining the SEC..

Winning fixes everything and we haven’t won squat lately..
I don't know - the Big 10 West would have been a very boring division even if we had been winning. I'll tell you this - in all the years we were in the Big 8/Big 12, I was offered free tickets to a conference game maybe twice; in 2002, I had to pay at least full face amount for tickets to the Missouri game. As soon as we started playing Big 10 West teams, free tickets started being offered to me A LOT - and often I was like the third or fourth person they were offered to. I'd be shocked if anyone other than a season ticket holder has ever had to pay full face to watch us play Purdue, Minnesota, Northwestern, Illinois, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
Shoulder checking Missouri out of our way into the front doors the big ten could definitely be seen as the 2nd best move.

But...

The alternative to not going to the big ten and not going to the SEC would be staying pat and TCU did not get snubbed for a playoff bid by being in the big 12.

You could argue that staying in the big 12 would have been just as good as going to the big was. The payout in the big 12 might not be as much. But if they were able to get BYU, Utah, AZ, ASU, and CU then that conference with Nebraska in it seems much much better and the payout I could not see being worse. Only Nebraska would be the premier team. And arguably have the recruiting advantage within that footprint.

With Nebraska in the b12 right now. I could see those Arizona schools and Utah schools sliding on over easily.

Then...after all that....Imagine the b12 with Washington instead of UCF. Oregon instead of Cincinati.
Oregon and Washington aren't going to go to the Big 12. They will either go to the B1G, make the PAC 12 work, or form some other conference on the West Coast, likely a combination of PAC 12 and Mountain West teams.
 
Boy this thread a bunch of miserable fans complaining about what if... This is truly sad...

N will be back to respectability sooner than later.. it doesn't matter what conference they're in, recruit and build.
Ten years later and I still hate that we moved to the B1G 🤮

If N were winning 9-10 games a year and competing for conference championships would you feel the same? If N would have stayed in the B12 they'd be begging a conference to take they after TX and OU bailed on the conference...N just needs to worry about what they can control..
 
  • Like
Reactions: moralvictories
If N were winning 9-10 games a year and competing for conference championships would you feel the same?
yes, I felt the same when we won 9-10 games a year and regularly played in the CCG.

respectability and B1G don't belong in the same sentence.

we are and forever will be in the minors. on-field, league-wide futility proves it.

the only people on Earth who think the B1G is a good conference are B1G fans & the national media who work for the entities that pay its penance.
 
I'm shocked at how out of touch people are with reality. The Big 10 was the only conference that wanted us. The Big 12 didn't want us. The SEC didn't want us. ACC? Nope. Pac 12? No way.

Shocking I know, but all these so-called friends in the Big 12 didn't actually like us. In fact, most hated us with a burning passion.

So maybe we should sit around and cry for the Big 8. Or come up reasons we should have gone to the NFL. It makes about as much sense.
we had zero friends in the Big 12. I'm not sure you'll find a single post that says otherwise

now every team in the conference is our friend

yay
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT