Career win % is always a relevant statistic. Even when it doesn’t fit your narrative.
My narrative? Sure it can be a relevant statistic. I am just pointing out a lot of missing context, which is being dismissed to fit an agenda, just like cherry-picking stats like record against Coach A.
PJ Fleck went to a program that had been winning 8 games a year and has continued to win at that clip. Matt Rhule has built up two programs and then left. He didn't stick around to continue racking up winning seasons, like Fleck did (not that Fleck hasn't tried to get out of Minnesota). Wouldn't Matt Rhule's record look a lot different had he just stayed at Baylor or Temple?
I just don't see Fleck continuing to win at the same clip as his predecessors as being that impressive. I tend to agree with Tuco when he said:
IF a coach takes over a losing program and in 2 seasons the program is winning games and making bowl games and competing for conference titles in year 3 then that is more impressive than taking over a program that won 9 games and maintain 9 wins.