Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And 70,000 more reasons for you to complain.Just $70k more that isn’t going toward football
Probably because that's the rationale he had to use to get the horse purchase past his wife.Because he couldn’t afford a $70K horse making $800K plus a year?
Now that I believe. Sorry, my contract says I have to buy the horse, and no you can't see the contract.Probably because that's the rationale he had to use to get the horse purchase past his wife.![]()
Did you read the article on Cooks new contract. Nebraska was just giving him a retention bonus. Cook is the one that brought the horse into the discussion not Nebraska.Top roping horses are stupid expensive. But hey, in this day when a family commuter SUV costs $70k+, is this really news? They could've just raised his salary $100k and not said anything about the horse, but they probably thought Nebraskans would think it was cool. This article is 10 years old, so probably double these numbers:
"To get a great head horse, you’ve got to be ready to spend $25,000 to $100,000, depending on what other factors (looks, breeding, experience) you’re looking for.
“We’ve got the chance to rope for $100,000 every year in Las Vegas,” Guy said. “And the ropings every weekend are paying $5,000 to $25,000. Then there’s the Reno Rodeo Invitational, the US Finals, the Wildfire. We have a real chance at real money, and a good horse is one of the first investments ropers should make if they want to compete.”
![]()
Bull Market: The Rise of Rope Horse Prices
As the big jackpots' payouts number in the millions each year, the demand for horses ropers can win on continues to climb. So do their prices.teamropingjournal.com
If people actually read anything on here, they would have seen this was already a thread and already covered a week ago.Did you read the article on Cooks new contract. Nebraska was just giving him a retention bonus. Cook is the one that brought the horse into the discussion not Nebraska.
I understand that. Could the Nebraska admin not have said, "Sure, we'll pay for your horse but we're just gonna add it to the contract and not say anything about the horse." ??? They could have called it "retention bonus" or "best VB coach in the world bonus" or "genuine Nebraska hero bonus." They intentionally wanted everyone to know it was for a horse because most people think it's a cool story.Did you read the article on Cooks new contract. Nebraska was just giving him a retention bonus. Cook is the one that brought the horse into the discussion not Nebraska.
It's because it was in the Wall Street Journal today.If people actually read anything on here, they would have seen this was already a thread and already covered a week ago.
They did call it a retention bonus. Cook is the on they let everyone know it was a horse.I understand that. Could the Nebraska admin not have said, "Sure, we'll pay for your horse but we're just gonna add it to the contract and not say anything about the horse." ??? They could have called it "retention bonus" or "best VB coach in the world bonus" or "genuine Nebraska hero bonus." They intentionally wanted everyone to know it was for a horse because most people think it's a cool story.
In today's WSJ, it's reported that John Cook got a $70,000 horse as part of his new contract. NU couldn't buy the horse directly but gave Cook a $70,000 retention bonus that he will use to buy the horse.