In response to Mo. Barry's tweet about wanting to win a national championship at Nebraska.
I'll stand by my guess that this kid is our next commit.
His offer sheet reads as a "whose who" of CFB.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Likely still not enough for the experts here if he comesGood grief. I just looked at his profile. It is probably easier to ask who hasn't offered him than to ask who has offered him. Pretty impressive.
Likely still not enough for the experts here if he comes
In response to Mo. Barry's tweet about wanting to win a national championship at Nebraska.
I'll stand by my guess that this kid is our next commit.
His offer sheet reads as a "whose who" of CFB.
ESL?
Not the type of talent we need to take us to the next level @Blackshirtgang21 @suhnami
I don't speak jive, could someone translate what he wrote for me?
In response to Mo. Barry's tweet about wanting to win a national championship at Nebraska.
I'll stand by my guess that this kid is our next commit.
His offer sheet reads as a "whose who" of CFB.
hard to explain with Barbara Billingsley gone.What is jive?
Any chance you grace us with that "recruiting board" of yours any time soon?What is jive?
I have no idea what that communication on Twitter meant....Am I alone??????
In response to Mo. Barry's tweet about wanting to win a national championship at Nebraska.
I'll stand by my guess that this kid is our next commit.
His offer sheet reads as a "whose who" of CFB.
You're not.I have no idea what that communication on Twitter meant....Am I alone??????
well lets go win that bitchI don't speak jive, could someone translate what he wrote for me?
I do not appreciate you attributing things to me that I never said.Not the type of talent we need to take us to the next level @Blackshirtgang21 @suhnami
He is only a 5.6...maybe he'll get a bump up and become acceptable.
That would help us get to the minimum threshold of 5.7's or, dare I hope, 4 stars necessary per class.
I do not appreciate you attributing things to me that I never said.
Maybe you could get some of those other coaches to stop winning so much with their 4 and 5 star talent to help out your position?
Fact remains, the teams that do well have those numbers. Do NOT let facts stop you from posting like an imbecile.
Already did for inside LBAny chance you grace us with that "recruiting board" of yours any time soon?
Must have missed it. Any chance you share your expertise on other positions?Already did for inside LB
I will take him all day any day, but he is an exception to the rule, most guys with his offer sheet AND from the vaunted southeastern region have at least 4*s by their name. Maybe they know he is going to commit to Nebraska so they keeping the man down! If he commits to in-state UGA I bet he gets that 4*. Amirite?
It was a joke homie. But it does demonstrate why the minimum number of 5.7 or betters could break down on closer examinations.
On your knees?
So you go from referring to me as an "imbecile", to junior high sexual humor. Let me guess, if the insults keep regressing, you'll call me a Big Poopy Head next time, right?
Note...I never stated any position, so any reference to my "position" being flawed is just you trying to create a straw-man to tear down.
The purpose of my post was to point out that stating an arbitrary number of recruits per class must have an arbitrary minimum recruit ranking for the team to be successful in the future is overly simplistic. That's all.
It was going to be a "your mom" joke.
Even though I was correct about your position on the recruits, I should not have assumed I was, even if you were sarcastically referring to to that. I should have let you make some claim referring to the number of recruits and their ranking as "arbitrary" and then ripped that to shreds. Lesson learned.
It is simple, but there is a correlation to the success on the field and number of recruits with a certain ranking. I didn't pick some "arbitrary" number, perhaps you're referring to someone else who did.
I didn't say that was all there was to it, but can most all of us agree that without a certain talent level it is going to be very difficult to compete for championships? Out of all the things to try and fix that one seems pretty simple and it is an area Nebraska has been not measuring up to compared to other schools that are having more success.
If you don't think that is a fact,present your data to support something different.
I jumped too far ahead on the regression, my mistake.
Of course we all agree to the bolded. Or, at least I'd hope so. Ideally, we'd fill up on all 5-stars, picking who we want and declining the 5-stars we don't want. I think we all know a team built this way would have a step up on the rest. We all know that the national champions generally have top 5-10 classes making up their team the year that they win it.
But I guess I missed the fact(s) that supports your 15+ 5.7+'s in a class . Unless this is just your way of wording the team rankings (that to get to rank X we need at least this number of this rated or higher recruits) correlation that I'm more familiar with. If that's the case, I've never seen it stated that way, and I apologize for my misunderstanding.
Dawg, don't be one of those people on the internet that takes a general statement, finds an exception and then is all like "ohh look what about this here? yep what you said was wrong, in your face."
Obviously if some people are calling him the #1 DE recruit in the country he's got some skill.
Do you think he's going to stay 5.6?