Nebraska has National Titles. Yes. Congratulations. You have an admirable history. An enviable tradition. So does Michigan. And OSU. And Minnesota. I can't remember their fan bases going on and on and on and on and on and on............
Tons of bitterness over Iowa's schedule.
- Thread starter archiehawk
- Start date
Nebraska has National Titles. Yes. Congratulations. You have an admirable history. An enviable tradition. So does Michigan. And OSU. And Minnesota. I can't remember their fan bases going on and on and on and on and on and on............
Only when other fan bases want to come to this site an talk trash. How would you prefer we measure programs...by height?
Only when other fan bases want to come to this site an talk trash. How would you prefer we measure programs...by height?
No, you deserve respect for your accomplishments.
some use these forums for fun, and i find enjoyment. Sometimes I'm even compelled to post, when calling bs. you are full of it on this one.
I have watched every Iowa and Nebraska game this year...start to finish. I have watched our big red lose time and time again in excruciating fashion, against opponents that are l really pedestrian. Across the river beyond a few mouth breathers that talk crap in these forums, you have a team and staff that isn't squawking, just rolling up their sleeves and getting things done.
For those interested in cutting through the bs, here is what I saw in the Iowa games this year - isu had 4 first downs the entire second half, and Iowa had nearly 300 yds of offense the second half. Yes, Iowa scored late to make it a 2 td game. My eye balls saw nothing that resembled Iowa barely winning.
Iowa wasn't lucky to beat a Pitt team that I think all will see will be fairly tough this year. Unless you consider giving up 17 points to pitt off of turnovers and special teams play lucky. I saw a team answer two Pitt scoring drives with ones of their own.
Yes Iowa got a red zone fumble against Wisky. It was caused by a defensive end that grew up closer to Lincoln than Iowa City that wasn't recruited by Nebraska, lining up over center, and pushing a multiple year starting guard from wisconsin into Stave prior to getting to a running back. Did Iowa get breaks or make them vs bucky, I guess it depends upon the lens you watch games.
I have no problem with shared titles at all. Some husker poster had a problem with Iowa's shared titles.
As for natties, Iowa has as many as Nebraska or Minnesota in this milennium.
ZERO.
The current teams are playing THIS season, some players go back a few years. NONE of the current players played in the glory days of either team.
Like recent games, I expect a hard fought close game with Nebraska this season.
You are incorrect...read this slowly...I have a problem with shared titles with a team YOU LOST TO. If you didn't play Mich that year...fair game...but you did, and you lost.
That's kind of hard to do, as they all sound like complete idiots. Kind of like Nebraska fans going to a Duke or Kentucky board talking junk about basketball.
So both programs have been insignificant this millennium. The only difference is before then Nebraska had success, where as Iowa has always been irrelevant.
I gotta say, I am very amused to read your Husker board.On one thread you trash Iowa and their weak schedule, and give no credit for beating a WEAK Wisky team, yet I see your Wisky vs Nebbie prediction board and 90 % of you are picking that very same weak Wisky team that lost to the lowly Hawkeyes to beat your Huskers......Interesting
How is it interesting? Many of us don't think our team is that good either. I don't think this Wisky team is that good.........but they have a good enough defense to probably beat Nebraska. So methinks you're amused rather easily.
Because we're jealous you have council bluffs and carter lake and we don't.
Similar threads
