You got one TD and expected to win?
And what are you doing at 251pm?Are you a civilian contractor at Offutt AFB? You sound a lot like one of the two tool hawk fans I have to put up with all day. You're not using government time or resources for this are you? Fraud, waste and abuse is a big deal.
You got one TD and expected to win?
Actually no. Kirk went 1-10 his first year.Neither did Kirk Ferentz.
It's funny what a little winning does. To Io_a's credit they are 5-0 and have done the things they need to, but the chest pumping is hilarious.
It's going to be pretty funny when Nebraska beats Iowa again this year. And no matter how the season goes, I guarantee they will.
Iowa should be 3-1 in the series since Neb joined the B1G. This Iowa team won't find a way to choke a game away. We all know what happened last time in Lincoln
Congrats on beating your first decent team all year. Now run along.
Iowa should be 3-1 in the series since Neb joined the B1G. This Iowa team won't find a way to choke a game away. We all know what happened last time in Lincoln
Good lord. Give me what he is drinking.We are level headed compared to this guy....
http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/outkick-s-top-ten-for-week-5-100315
He must have been drunk when he wrote this.
Good lord. Give me what he is drinking.
Since when is beating Pitt and Wisky better than beating VT and Oregon
That was not a "fortunate fumble". It was caused by the D end who moved inside and hit the guard so hard he stepped back and stepped on the QB's foot. It was caused by Iowa's hard hittingIowa has played well. They play sound defense, and generally mistake free football. That keeps them in games time and again. They were fortunate that Stave fumbled on the one-yard line late in the game, otherwise I don't think Iowa's offense does a thing against that Badger defense to win the game.
Every Iowa thread turns into a pissing match... The OP was a little confused and I think trying to stir the pot which doesn't need more stirring. The fact is that Iowa is 5-0 regardless of ugly wins, weak schedule or luck... Nebraska has had some bad luck, injuries and some baaad coaching decisions. Iowa was missing their best receiver and a starting tackle and were very lucky to get a win at Wisconsin due to their QB fumbling at the one. That being said, Sometime it takes luck on your side to win championships. Hopefully we can keep lady luck on our side for the rest of the season.
Alabama beat Wisky at AlabamaHawkeye Math Class this week:
Alabama beat Wisky
Iowa beat Wisky
Iowa = Alabama
Lets not re-hash this again... We all know that Iowa has been a more successful program in the last 15 years then Nebraska! There ya go...now you got me in your pissing match!Wait, what? What would Iowa know about winning championships?
That was not a "fortunate fumble". It was caused by the D end who moved inside and hit the guard so hard he stepped back and stepped on the QB's foot. It was caused by Iowa's hard hitting
Lets not re-hash this again... We all know that Iowa has been a more successful program in the last 15 years then Nebraska! There ya go...now you got me in your pissing match!
This century sense 2001 how many BCS games have the programs seen? IOWA 2 NEB 0 Ok how about Conference Championships? IOWA 2 NEB 0. You guys remind me of Minny always bringing up your National Titles from the 20th century. Welcome to the BIG10 and the 21st century!
The point being it was caused by a hard hitting D-end not just a lucky break. Had he not done that, the fumble would have never occurred. Most times good luck comes from hard work. Hard work is not a "fortunate" break.Still a fortunate turnover for iowa
The point being it was caused by a hard hitting D-end not just a lucky break. Had he not done that, the fumble would have never occurred. Most times good luck comes from hard work. Hard work is not a "fortunate" break.
You claim conference titles in a time frame when Nebraska had to earn them in a championship game and Iowa didn't. If you want to compare apples to apples, in that time frame Nebraska won their division 7 times ...that would be the equivalent to Iowa's big claim to fame for conference championships. Nebraska played for a national championship in 2001...how many has Iowa played for in that same time frame...or ever for that matter.
Wins since 2000: Iowa 115, Nebraska 130. Nebraska whips your ass head to head too....yet here you clowns are, shooting off your mouths and you have never accomplished anything in the entire history of your program.
This century sense 2001 how many BCS games have the programs seen? IOWA 2 NEB 0 Ok how about Conference Championships? IOWA 2 NEB 0. You guys remind me of Minny always bringing up your National Titles from the 20th century. Welcome to the BIG10 and the 21st century!
Must be real proud of those division titles beating out the Kansas schools lol. It's not Iowa's fault they have the best record in conference and couldn't play in a championship game. They are still conference champs. The 21st century also started in 2001, not 2000. There's that Nowledge at its finest. Might wanna re-adjust those win totals
You also claim a Big Ten Championship with Michigan and Michigan beat Iowa that year.........oh and speaking of Kansas level schools....in regards to your other other "Big Ten Title"...you lost to Iowa State that season.
Congrats on your shared Big Ten Title with a team who beat you on the same playing field....it really helped you to go 1-3 vs NU since we have joined and pushed Iowa to have a record .500 since NU joined the conference.
So you're hating on shared conference championships in a conference with no championship game? Maybe you could help me out then and explain what happened in 2001 when Neb couldn't win their own division but somehow played in a Nat'l Title Game
We shouldn't have been in the National Title game...no doubt about it. And yes, I'm hating on a supposed conference "title" shared with a team that you could not beat.
Must be real proud of those division titles beating out the Kansas schools lol. It's not Iowa's fault they have the best record in conference and couldn't play in a championship game. They are still conference champs. The 21st century also started in 2001, not 2000. There's that Nowledge at its finest. Might wanna re-adjust those win totals
And why, when discussing "in this century" do Iowa fans always want to start at 2001 instead of 2000?
We shouldn't have been in the National Title game...no doubt about it. And yes, I'm hating on a supposed conference "title" shared with a team that you could not beat.
But not hating on shared "National" titles when you didn't even play the other team? Shared titles only count if YOU SHARE THEM?
1970
Arizona State 11–0 Frank Kush PS
Nebraska 11–0–1 Bob Devaney AP, BR, CFRA, DeS, DuS, FN, FWAA, HAF, NCF, R(FACT), SR
Notre Dame 10–1 Ara Parseghian MGR, R(FACT), SR
Ohio State 9–1 Woody Hayes NFF
Texas 10–1 Darrell Royal B(QPRS), L, NFF, R(FACT), UPI
1997
Michigan 12–0 Lloyd Carr AP, FN, FWAA, NCF, NFF, SN
Nebraska 13–0 Tom Osborne A&H, AS, B(QPRS), BR, CCR, DeS, DuS, ERS, MGR, NCF, NYT, R(FACT), SR, USAT/ESPN
or
1994
Florida State 10–1–1 Bobby Bowden DuS
Nebraska 13–0 Tom Osborne AP, AS, B(QPRS), BR, FN, FWAA, NCF, R(FACT), SN, SR, UPI, USAT/CNN, USAT/NFF
Penn State 12–0 Joe Paterno CCR, DeS, ERS, MGR, NCF, NYT, R(FACT), SR
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_football_national_championships_in_NCAA_Division_I_FBS
Due to the lack of an official NCAA title, determining the nation's top college football team has often engendered controversy.[5] A championship team is independently declared by multiple individuals and organizations, often referred to as "selectors".[6]:74–75[7] These choices are sometimes not unanimous.[5] While the NCAA has never officially endorsed a championship team, it has documented the choices of some selectors in its official NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision Records publication.[6]:74–83 In addition, various analysts have independently published their own choices for each season. These opinions can often diverge with others as well as individual schools' claims to national titles, which may or may not correlate to the selections published elsewhere.