No it doesn't. It gets rid of an underperforming coach who is dragging the program down. It also lets the coaching world know that Nebraska is looking for GREAT coaches, and if you are a great coach and want to get rich ($$$)... then this is the place for you.
Keeping underperforming coaches, lets the whole world know we don't care about winning and great coaching... and may in affect attract coaches who are more interested in money than winning.
I am 100% behind our head coach and I hope he can get us where we want to be. But with that said... our coaching hiring process is a disaster.
You're also wrong. It's staggering to see how many of you guys don't get it.
I'm a rising coach so I've got options. All places will make me very wealthy and plenty have advantages like Nebraska. Should I go to the one that has a record of giving me time to establish my program or the place that axed a veteran I respect after a year (when he inherited a depleted roster from the guy before him hat was canned). Chuckle. Chuckle.