ADVERTISEMENT

Most Improved OL's

Rhule has said many times in the last 2 seasons his game plan was to get out to a lead and lean on the defense and run the ball to run out the clock. He has also said, when asked about why the 2nd half offense was terrible, that the he gets too conservative in the 2nd half. How is all of this an indictment against a specific position group and position group coach, instead of the guy who calls the plays and the head man who makes that decision?
how is the offensive line responsible for the 96th overall rushing offense?

is that a serious question or are you fvcking with me?
 
Rhule has said many times in the last 2 seasons his game plan was to get out to a lead and lean on the defense and run the ball to run out the clock. He has also said, when asked about why the 2nd half offense was terrible, that the he gets too conservative in the 2nd half. How is all of this an indictment against a specific position group and position group coach, instead of the guy who calls the plays and the head man who makes that decision?
Because for teams with an actual good OL coach running the football =/= never scoring
 
2015-2024

But in all seriousness, you think we lost that game because of one play? And that is your basis for why Donovan is a bad coach?

And again - your reply has NOTHING to do with my post to the other poster.

If you’d like to compare resumes of the two coaches, please do. I’ll be waiting
What do you think Donnie’s resume consists of?

He’s had exactly 1 big boy job in his life and it’s this one
 
it has everything to do with replying to you, it's just inconvenient for the tantrum you're currently throwing.

with a better OL, those plays don't decide the game. but they did, because the OL failed to do their job. again.

my basis for why he's a bad coach is because we lose games on our inability to impose our will against other teams.

our signature wins against Wisconsin and Colorado were us racing out to a giant lead and hoping the other team couldn't play catch up. thank god it worked, because we are not able to put away teams unless we've built a 3+ score lead.
We outscored WI in the 3rd AND 4th quarter to stretch the 14 point halftime lead.

Imposing their will speaks to a run game. Did any team impose their will against us this season? We’re all of their OL coaches bad?

“imposing your will” hasn’t happened since the 90s for us. And it doesn’t happen in college football much

Im not sure what you’re expecting but our yards per carry went up significantly vs the previous year and sacks went DOWN. I think Raiola is doing just fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyLvr
What do you think Donnie’s resume consists of?

He’s had exactly 1 big boy job in his life and it’s this one

You don’t think his NFL experience and current performance is better than Satterfields body of work?

If there is a clear reason our offense wasn’t good over the last few years it seems like a no brainer to point to the guy who has constantly underachieved vs the guy (Raiola) who has done pretty well and has a stronger background.

The argument wasn’t if Raiola had his mentors long and distinguished resume - it was that his resume was far better than Satterfields.

And it is.
 
Donnie has had 3 years.

It’s now his 4th year.

We ran for 3.7 ypc and scored on just 59% of redzone trips on the road.

Our OL didn’t get any better, Dana covered them up with low hanging fruit scheme adjustments with 6+ blocking every play.

His recruits are largely absent, nobody has improved their personal draft stock under him.

He is a mascot who is only employed because of his last name.

Seems these much needed transfer targets have little interest in playing for him, which sucks.
I've always been careful to say three years with his recruits should show improvement on the line, It has. now we can have a discussion whether it's enough but there was improvement. This season will tell the tale. If the line doesn't show significant improvement Donovan might consider updating his resume.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan66
Last season, Raiola's coaching/recruitinig footprint on the following Olinemen was as follows.
Gottula - Raiola recruit, Evans - recruited by Dawson, but has only been coached by Raiola, Scott - recruited by Raiola via the portal, Mazzuca - recruited by Raiola via the portal, Lutovsky - coached by Raiola for 3 of his four years at NU, Benhart - coached by Raiola for 50% of his tenure at NU.
Thanks for this.
2023 NU Oline PFF:

  • Henry Lutovsky: 49.6
  • Justin Evans: 61.3
  • Teddy Prochazka: 66.9
  • Ben Scott: 63.8
  • Tyler Knaak: 66.1
  • Nouredin Nouili: 62.8
  • Ethan Piper: 63.6
For 2023 NU lost to injury longtime starters Piper and Prochazka. I wasn't able to find 2024 NU Oline PFF that wasn't premium info so if someone can post it it could be illuminating.
 
Thanks for this.
2023 NU Oline PFF:

  • Henry Lutovsky: 49.6
  • Justin Evans: 61.3
  • Teddy Prochazka: 66.9
  • Ben Scott: 63.8
  • Tyler Knaak: 66.1
  • Nouredin Nouili: 62.8
  • Ethan Piper: 63.6
For 2023 NU lost to injury longtime starters Piper and Prochazka. I wasn't able to find 2024 NU Oline PFF that wasn't premium info so if someone can post it it could be illuminating.
What was Benhart’s grade? Both he and Scott were HM All-B1G in 2023.
 
Imposing their will speaks to a run game. Did any team impose their will against us this season? We’re all of their OL coaches bad?
Illinois out-rushed us 4:1.

Indiana out-rushed us 3:1.

USC/UCLA both outrushed us.

Iowa hung out in the backfield whenever they felt like marching thru the turnstile that is our OL.
Im not sure what you’re expecting but our yards per carry went up significantly vs the previous year and sacks went DOWN. I think Raiola is doing just fine.
We averaged 3.7 ypc. That isn’t even top 10 in the conference. It’s worse than Purdue, ffs

You are full of stupid takes, feel free to keep going.
 
Right, the OL coach has nothing to do with the offensive system.

Wait, what’s this?
Can you confirm Raiola’s additions made the cut? Since it says right there he’s narrowing it down. Can you confirm every single rushing play called the last 2 years were all only Raiola’s plays? So that way we know it’s nobody else’s fault but Raiola. Can you confirm that Raiola is the only person who calls the plays while we’re at it? Can you also confirm for us he is the only one who teaches wide receivers how to block? Donnie Raiola is the SOLE reason this team sucks on offense, we get it you hate that man, but I need some more evidence that this is only his fault and not even a smidge belonging to the career poverty HC/OC named Marcus Satterfield or the middle school JV coach with 3 hairs in his armpit coaching the receivers.

I guess Nebraska being 46th in the nation last year in yards per attempt rushing wasn’t good enough for you. 65% percentile in the nation (above average) and 4th in the Big Ten.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyLvr and Laner2
I gotta assume that most girls don’t go into a relationship thinking they are gonna be the butt-slut girl.

But you know what, sometimes that dude has a lot of things going for him, and can set her up, and makes a lot of $$, and she does whatever she has to do.

Rhule is stuck with Raiola as OL coach.
 
Illinois out-rushed us 4:1.

Indiana out-rushed us 3:1.

USC/UCLA both outrushed us.

Iowa hung out in the backfield whenever they felt like marching thru the turnstile that is our OL.

We averaged 3.7 ypc. That isn’t even top 10 in the conference. It’s worse than Purdue, ffs

You are full of stupid takes, feel free to keep going.
So four teams out rushed us? Yay

And Iowa game didn’t look like a turnstile line. To use your terminology we had 3x the rushing yards as them. Sheesh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laner2 and OzzyLvr
I gotta assume that most girls don’t go into a relationship thinking they are gonna be the butt-slut girl.

But you know what, sometimes that dude has a lot of things going for him, and can set her up, and makes a lot of $$, and she does whatever she has to do.

Rhule is stuck with Raiola as OL coach.
This made me spit out my coffee and I wasn’t even drinking any
 
Illinois out-rushed us 4:1.

Indiana out-rushed us 3:1.

USC/UCLA both outrushed us.

Iowa hung out in the backfield whenever they felt like marching thru the turnstile that is our OL.

We averaged 3.7 ypc. That isn’t even top 10 in the conference. It’s worse than Purdue, ffs

You are full of stupid takes, feel free to keep going.
So four teams out rushed us? Yay

And Iowa game didn’t look like a turnstile line.
Illinois out-rushed us 4:1.

Indiana out-rushed us 3:1.

USC/UCLA both outrushed us.

Iowa hung out in the backfield whenever they felt like marching thru the turnstile that is our OL.

We averaged 3.7 ypc. That isn’t even top 10 in the conference. It’s worse than Purdue, ffs

You are full of stupid takes, feel free to keep going.


Orrrrrrrrr maybe it was Satterfield like I said.

When Holgerson came into the mix against USC, we jumped from 3.4 YPC to 3.7 YPC by end of season.

Yeah, that’s right.

Under Satterfield we averaged 3.4 YPC
Under Holgerson we averaged 4.2 YPC

Not to mention our PPG jumped by a full TD.

Literally changed ONE variable and showed dramatic improvement in the run game. Under an OC that’s known as a passing guru.

4.2 for the season would have put us a spot ahead of Michigan at 72nd. Right above Rutgers and Indiana. Also above Minnesota, Purdue (who averaged 3.6 so not sure what you’re talking about), UCLA and Northwestern.

It was Satterfield. As I said.

I’m not claiming Raiola is the best I’ve ever seen. But I’ve seen a few things.

1. He can recruit
2. He has improved our line IMO
3. I want to see what he can do with Satterfield gone.

Plus he gets bonus points for saying whatever he said to Fickell and crew that made the cop sprint over to him. Extra points for that.
 
Last edited:
I guess Nebraska being 46th in the nation last year in yards per attempt rushing wasn’t good enough for you. 65% percentile in the nation (above average) and 4th in the Big Ten.
You linked to the 2023 season. We were 99th last year.

 
So four teams out rushed us? Yay

And Iowa game didn’t look like a turnstile line. To use your terminology we had 3x the rushing yards as them. Sheesh
Yes, 4 teams that kicked our teeth in. Glad losing makes you excited.

Since you love giving homework, why don't you tell me who had more sacks in the Iowa game.

So four teams out rushed us? Yay

And Iowa game didn’t look like a turnstile line.



Orrrrrrrrr maybe it was Satterfield like I said.

When Holgerson came into the mix against USC, we jumped from 3.4 YPC to 3.7 YPC by end of season.

Yeah, that’s right.

Under Satterfield we averaged 3.4 YPC
Under Holgerson we averaged 4.2 YPC

Not to mention our PPG jumped by a full TD.

Literally changed ONE variable and showed dramatic improvement in the run game. Under an OC that’s known as a passing guru.

4.2 for the season would have put us a spot ahead of Michigan at 72nd. Right above Rutgers and Indiana. Also above Minnesota, Purdue (who averaged 3.6 so not sure what you’re talking about), UCLA and Northwestern.

It was Satterfield. As I said.

I’m not claiming Raiola is the best I’ve ever seen. But I’ve seen a few things.

1. He can recruit
2. He has improved our line IMO
3. I want to see what he can do with Satterfield gone.

Plus he gets bonus points for saying whatever he said to Fickell and crew that made the cop sprint over to him. Extra points for that.
So now you've pivoted to "Holgorsen is good enough to overcome our shitty OL coach"

Hope you're right, but given your track record I won't hold my breath.
 
Last year, as in the 2023-2024 season. Not the current season we just wrapped up 2 weeks ago. Semantics.

Nonetheless, the piss poor shitty offense falls more on someone else than it does Dominic Raiola, but you’ve found your scapegoat.
So going from 46th to 99th in YPC was your evidence that Raiola is improving the OL?

What a line of thinking.

Surely our QB being our best rusher in 2023 couldn't have anything to do with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
So going from 46th to 99th in YPC was your evidence that Raiola is improving the OL?

What a line of thinking.

Surely our QB being our best rusher in 2023 couldn't have anything to do with it.
Never said that, but you want to blame the entire failures of the offense on the offensive line coach, which is absolutely retarded logic. ESPECIALLY when the offensive coordinator has never had an offense in the 50th percentile or better in his life. But like I said, you found your scapegoat. What a line of thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HUSKERBILL
Never said that, but you want to blame the entire failures of the offense on the offensive line coach, which is absolutely retarded logic. ESPECIALLY when the offensive coordinator has never had an offense in the 50th percentile or better in his life. But like I said, you found your scapegoat. What a line of thinking.
He’s not blaming the entire failure of the offense on our nepo OL coach

He’s acknowledging that Rhule’s handpicked OC was also a disgrace

Fact remains nobody has gotten better playing for Uncle Don, he has yet to produce even a 3rd team all-conference player and our OL can’t get a push when we need it most

We can’t score in the redzone - which causes us to lose games - in part because our longest tenured assistant’s unit sucks.

How many OL have we hosted this portal season? All but the multiple time criminal said “no thanks” to playing for Raiola.

He would be in D3 or on his couch if he had a different last name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Landomatic
He’s not blaming the entire failure of the offense on our nepo OL coach

He’s acknowledging that Rhule’s handpicked OC was also a disgrace

Fact remains nobody has gotten better playing for Uncle Don, he has yet to produce even a 3rd team all-conference player and our OL can’t get a push when we need it most

We can’t score in the redzone - which causes us to lose games - in part because our longest tenured assistant’s unit sucks.

How many OL have we hosted this portal season? All but the multiple time criminal said “no thanks” to playing for Raiola.

He would be in D3 or on his couch if he had a different last name.
hmmm when anyone tries to blame Satterfield, both of you have gone on to shift the blame to Raiola. And it was reported why they chose other schools. National championship aspirations (Oregon commit), play for their coaches (Washington st kid who went to WF. But yeah that’s all Raiola’s fault. Like I said, Y’all have your scapegoat and you’re not gonna change your mind. I’m not here to change it. I’m just here reminding you y’all are incorrect. Not saying he’s perfect. But he’s not the trash bag you keep making him out to be.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: king_kong_
hmmm when anyone tries to blame Satterfield, both of you have gone on to shift the blame to Raiola. And it was reported why they chose other schools. National championship aspirations (Oregon commit), play for their coaches (Washington st kid who went to WF. But yeah that’s all Raiola’s fault. Like I said, Y’all have your scapegoat and you’re not gonna change your mind. I’m not here to change it. I’m just here reminding you y’all are incorrect. Not saying he’s perfect. But he’s not the trash bag you keep making him out to be.
Don’t waste you time with King monkey and the other idiot. You will never win they move the goalposts as needed to win an argument.
 
He’s not blaming the entire failure of the offense on our nepo OL coach

He’s acknowledging that Rhule’s handpicked OC was also a disgrace

Fact remains nobody has gotten better playing for Uncle Don, he has yet to produce even a 3rd team all-conference player and our OL can’t get a push when we need it most

We can’t score in the redzone - which causes us to lose games - in part because our longest tenured assistant’s unit sucks.

How many OL have we hosted this portal season? All but the multiple time criminal said “no thanks” to playing for Raiola.

He would be in D3 or on his couch if he had a different last name.
The 20+ game starter for ND said “yes” too, correct?
 
Yes, 4 teams that kicked our teeth in. Glad losing makes you excited.

Since you love giving homework, why don't you tell me who had more sacks in the Iowa game.


So now you've pivoted to "Holgorsen is good enough to overcome our shitty OL coach"

Hope you're right, but given your track record I won't hold my breath.

1. No where did I say I was happy losing games. You’re literally inferring things I never said. The discussion point was if Raiola was the issue and I said it was Satterfield

2. I didn’t pivot to saying Holgersen is good enough to overcome our shitty OL coach. I think Raiola has shown promise. But whatever stage he was at was being hampered by a historically awful OC in Satterfield.

3. Who cares who had more sacks in the Iowa game? What does that have to do with a Satterfield vs Raiola debate?



Seriously man. You’re not good at debating.

Your stances are not backed up with well identified stats.
You make false claims that I never stated on positions I haven’t taken.
You then bring up random stats (sacks vs Iowa) that have very little relevance to the topic. One game doesn’t show much.
 
Never said that, but you want to blame the entire failures of the offense on the offensive line coach, which is absolutely retarded logic. ESPECIALLY when the offensive coordinator has never had an offense in the 50th percentile or better in his life. But like I said, you found your scapegoat. What a line of thinking.
I’m not blaming it entirely on him. Satterfield, Thomas and McGuire sucked too.

As you hilariously proved, our YPC went down significantly from 2023-2024.

You’d have us believe the OL coach has nothing to do with the run game, which is beyond retarded.
 
1. No where did I say I was happy losing games. You’re literally inferring things I never said. The discussion point was if Raiola was the issue and I said it was Satterfield

2. I didn’t pivot to saying Holgersen is good enough to overcome our shitty OL coach. I think Raiola has shown promise. But whatever stage he was at was being hampered by a historically awful OC in Satterfield.

3. Who cares who had more sacks in the Iowa game? What does that have to do with a Satterfield vs Raiola debate?



Seriously man. You’re not good at debating.

Your stances are not backed up with well identified stats.
You make false claims that I never stated on positions I haven’t taken.
You then bring up random stats (sacks vs Iowa) that have very little relevance to the topic. One game doesn’t show much.
Bill, all due respect, but you're the guy who said on this forum getting outscored in the 2nd half and specifically the 4th quarter is no big deal.
 
I’m not blaming it entirely on him. Satterfield, Thomas and McGuire sucked too.

As you hilariously proved, our YPC went down significantly from 2023-2024.

You’d have us believe the OL coach has nothing to do with the run game, which is beyond retarded.
Again, never said Raiola has no fault in this but he is the only one you continuously attack. You’re acting and speaking that the only person who impacts the run game is the OL coach, and that is an insult to people with actual mental retardations.
 
I’m just here reminding you y’all are incorrect.
no, we're not.

the fact we're still going to be starting a Frost recruit (Corcoran) after Donnie has been here for 4 years is frankly dumbfounding.

@PeliniTheCrutch has forgotten more about football than I'll probably ever know. I'll take his word for it over some blind clueless fanboy (you).

Uncle Donnie sucks. we both need & deserve better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thall_
1. No where did I say I was happy losing games. You’re literally inferring things I never said.
So four teams out rushed us? Yay
Retard.
2. I didn’t pivot to saying Holgersen is good enough to overcome our shitty OL coach. I think Raiola has shown promise. But whatever stage he was at was being hampered by a historically awful OC in Satterfield.
Both can be bad at the same time.
3. Who cares who had more sacks in the Iowa game? What does that have to do with a Satterfield vs Raiola debate?
What do sacks have to do with a discussion on the OL coach? You don’t even know what you’re debating.
Seriously man. You’re not good at debating.
Projection, you’re getting crushed.
Your stances are not backed up with well identified stats.
You rejecting/being too dumb to understand the stats is a personal problem. Sort yourself out.
You then bring up random stats (sacks vs Iowa) that have very little relevance to the topic. One game doesn’t show much.
Doubling down that sacks have nothing to do with the OL coach? 🤡
 
Again, never said Raiola has no fault in this but he is the only one you continuously attack. You’re acting and speaking that the only person who impacts the run game is the OL coach
I’ve been as critical of Satterfield, Thomas, and McGuire as anyone on this board. Feel free to use the search function to verify, cuz my takes age well on the matter.
that is an insult to people with actual mental retardations.
Sorry you felt insulted
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Landomatic
no, we're not.

the fact we're still going to be starting a Frost recruit (Corcoran) after Donnie has been here for 4 years is frankly dumbfounding.

@PeliniTheCrutch has forgotten more about football than I'll probably ever know. I'll take his word for it over some blind clueless fanboy (you).

Uncle Donnie sucks. we both need & deserve better.
Well you’re showing you’ve forgotten everything. It’s okay.
 
I’ve been as critical of Satterfield, Thomas, and McGuire as anyone on this board. Feel free to use the search function to verify, cuz my takes age well on the matter.

Sorry you felt insulted
So if you’ve been critical of them, you’d realize that all this crap you keep blaming on Raiola isn’t all on Raiola. But keep on with your scapegoat banter.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT