ADVERTISEMENT

Malachi Coleman

Joe Brady was a ridiculous rumor considering Rhule had just strung him up as a sacrificial lamb the only other time they'd worked together

Brady now coordinates the offense for the NFL MVP
Isn't Joe Brady the reason why Scott Shanle threw a huge hissy fit over Rhule being hired as Joe and Scott were buddies from their Saints days together?
 
Do you want to think about that for a second before you post? Like seriously dude, you just made yourself look like the biggest fool and you don’t even realize it.

“We talked in December” means December of 2023. This was in connection with what would become the Glenn Thomas hire

You do realize Marcus Satt was hired in December 2022, right? A whole dam year before Dana and Rhule talked.

You want to school me on research again? Dana was the Head Coach of Houston on December 1; 2022 (the day Satt was announced) . Dana coached a full dam season as head coach in 2023. Went 4-8. You trying to claim Matt tried to offer him the OC when he was HC @ a then P5 school? Dana was prepping his team for bowl game the day Marcus was hired 🤣🤣🤣🤣

When people talk about Dana being Matt’s first choice, it’s in reference to Glenn’s job. GTFO with your weakass claims son. I don’t know if I’m more embarrassed for you or the people that liked your rant that was completely dead wrong!!!

Some of you people make up so much crap, that it’s embarrassing that we are in the same fan base. I’m soooo embarrassed for you. So embarrassed. #factcheck
Paint chips ain't your friend slim shady. At the same time MR was feeling out Jake Peetz as a QB coach he opened his Rolodex and sent out feelers to Alex Van Pelt and Garrett Riley. I don't know Rhule's connection to Van Pelt but he knew about Riley when he was OC at TCU. Now go wipe your chin and slink away.
 
Coleman wasn’t redshirted because of the Transfer portal guys. Coleman wasn’t ready to see the field. I’m going back to his 4 year high school career and his first years with Neb. He’s a great athlete but a “not ready for primetime” football player. Maybe he will reach his potential at Minnesota but that’s certainly not a given. Again - the first National recruit from Neb since I’ve been following since 1983 that wasn’t a first team all state player. He was a non-factor in the 5 games I saw him play in. Great athleticism doesn’t always translate to great football player. Dave Jensen from Creighton Prep in the late 80s was a great DL athlete. But yet I’ve been told he was referred to by the Neb coaching staff as “looks like Tarzan. Plays like Jane”. This could be Malachi but I wish the best for him. In short - he wasn’t better this past season than the WRs that played. JMHO.

Another example - top 100 recruit Ed Morrow in late 80s/early 90s.
His lazy route in the endzone cost us a W his freshman year. The QB got blamed on this board for the INT but multiple former players said it was on Coleman.
 
His lazy route in the endzone cost us a W his freshman year. The QB got blamed on this board for the INT but multiple former players said it was on Coleman.
the coaching staff rightfully got the most criticism for that play

didn't help that the QB in question called his own number the play before, ignoring the play call
 
His lazy route in the endzone cost us a W his freshman year. The QB got blamed on this board for the INT but multiple former players said it was on Coleman.
the coaching staff rightfully got the most criticism for that play

didn't help that the QB in question called his own number the play before, ignoring the play call
I wish I could say which play this was but it happened multiple times to multiple QBs, so… too many options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz
I wish I could say which play this was but it happened multiple times to multiple QBs, so… too many options.
purdy INT on the goal line vs maryland.

no other NU QB ignored a playcall and ran his own (per Rhule in the postgame presser). just purdy.

the INT was 100% on the coaching staff. preposterous call in that situation, same result as Week 0 with the same concept. just flat out idiotic.

purdy (and coleman) aren't blameless, but they should've never been put in that spot even though purdy made an extremely me-first glory hog selfish decision the snap before.
 
Last edited:
purdy INT on the goal line vs maryland.

no other NU QB ignored a playcall and ran his own (per Rhule in the postgame presser). just purdy.

the INT was 100% on the coaching staff. preposterous call in that situation, same result as Week 0 with the same concept. just flat out idiotic.

purdy (and coleman) aren't blameless, but they should've never been put in that spot even though purdy made an extremely me-first glory hog selfish decision the snap before.
Wrong play. I’m too lazy to go back and find the one I’m talking about but I remember the play you’re talking about. That wasn’t it. Don’t remember which QB it was. Might have been Sims.
 
How can you look at that replay and not say the WR ran a lazy route? It was 3rd and goal from the 7, less than 4 minutes to go in the game, you just drove a good distance to set up the winning TD. IF Coleman runs the strong slant and just runs the route, the ball hits him at the one and he walks in. the CB was dropping already toward the end zone and had already given up his inside leverage.

Even if you want to blame Purdy or the staff. How about getting a tackle anywhere on Maryland's last drive. Or Tommy Hill not looking like a chump on at least 3 plays, including a 3rd and 10 play where he was called for PI.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyLvr
How can you look at that replay and not say the WR ran a lazy route? It was 3rd and goal from the 7, less than 4 minutes to go in the game, you just drove a good distance to set up the winning TD. IF Coleman runs the strong slant and just runs the route, the ball hits him at the one and he walks in. the CB was dropping already toward the end zone and had already given up his inside leverage.

Even if you want to blame Purdy or the staff. How about getting a tackle anywhere on Maryland's last drive. Or Tommy Hill not looking like a chump on at least 3 plays, including a 3rd and 10 play where he was called for PI.
It was a lazy route - the norm under our GA WR coach

He should’ve never had to run it. And purdy was never throwing it to him (predetermined to the corner).

Abysmal situational coaching with a helping of selfishness from purdy calling his own number the play before.

Whole team collapsed after that, just like always.
 
It was a lazy route - the norm under our GA WR coach

And he should’ve never had to run it. And purdy was never throwing it to him (predetermined to the corner).

Abysmal situational coaching with a helping of selfishness from purdy calling his own number the play before.
Maybe, but let's assume that Purdy was throwing the corner route. The lazy route left the corner in a place where he could intercept the ball. A sharp route by Coleman clears the CB from the area and leaves Billy Kemp 1 on 1.
 
Maybe, but let's assume that Purdy was throwing the corner route. The lazy route left the corner in a place where he could intercept the ball. A sharp route by Coleman clears the CB from the area and leaves Billy Kemp 1 on 1.
No assumption

He was throwing the corner

Yes, that’s how the concept is drawn up.

What you saw is what it looks like when imbeciles (satt) and laughing stocks (McGuire) are in charge of ensuring it’s executed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laner2
No assumption

He was throwing the corner

Yes, that’s how the concept is drawn up.

What you saw is what it looks like when imbeciles (satt) and laughing stocks (McGuire) are in charge of ensuring it’s executed.
I think you put too much on the WR coach and the OC. The play design is what it is, even if they, the coaches, are as incompetent as you believe, the concept was clear to even you and I. Coleman runs the slant, Kemp runs the corner. By November the imbeciles and the laughing stocks in charge of ensuring it is executed are not on the field to ensure that Coleman runs the slant as expected. Again, many plays that game were executed, perhaps even this one at some point during the game, the players have to execute the play.
 
I think both of you are right.



No assumption

He was throwing the corner

Yes, that’s how the concept is drawn up.

What you saw is what it looks like when imbeciles (satt) and laughing stocks (McGuire) are in charge of ensuring it’s executed.
Maybe, but let's assume that Purdy was throwing the corner route. The lazy route left the corner in a place where he could intercept the ball. A sharp route by Coleman clears the CB from the area and leaves Billy Kemp 1 on 1.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT