Your original post was edited, it now says team when it didn’t before you pathetic disingenuous POS.
Let’s compare common opponents in 1997 between Michigan & Nebraska
- Thread starter PapaTed
- Start date
no it wasn't
if it was you'd see a "this post was edited at x time" sticker in the bottom right hand corner
you're so obsessed with me it's pathetic
Hate to break it to you but Michigan are legitimate co national champions for 1997. It counts.
Look, besides just the stats that show NU would dominate, Vegas also said it and remember THIS GAME WAS NOT PLAYED, so that means the betting public did not/could not influence the line.
Vegas oddsmakers said NU -7
Vegas oddsmakers said NU -7
When it’s 49-14 and their defense scored in the last minute on a offense fumble recovery.. Their offense didn’t score 21 points. Offensively they didn’t score 14 points till mid way in the 4thQ..
This is like bragging about getting a handjob at prom.
Not if you edit it within a certain amount of time and you know this. I even went back and viewed your original post to make sure. But a loser like you will never be honest so who cares.
You know what is crazy...Wolf fans brag about that "title" while Husker fans are pissed that the wolfs got any part of it at all.
That tells you all you need to know.
I would even argue that Tennessee was better than the wolfs that year.
Gophers did in 1960 lost the bowl game but claimed a National championship ..
read the post you quoted - edits don't change in those
it's the same
what a f*cking dipshit. that cop in mpls knelt on the wrong neck!
Hey Minnesota, I said "outright Championship".
Try to keep up.
I'm lapping your dumbass and you don't even know it.
Why you lost!
Ohh that‘s right voted before the bowl… We should be 1983 champs then..
Holy crap I literally cannot tell the difference between Minnesota fans and Iowa fans on this board.
That makes sense as we’re both pretty similar, we both kick your ass every year.
The reality is Nebraska gave up only 7 and 10 points to Baylor and Colorado prior to the 4th quarter... Nebraska led Baylor 49-7 midway through the 4th, had all the defensive starters yanked, and the Bears get 14 of their 21 in garbage time... Meanwhile, over in Ann Arbor, Woodson and the rest of Michigan's starting D are in for something like 46 of 50 defensive snaps... Nebraska was about to go up 34-10 on CU with 5 minutes to go before getting careless with the football... Colorado gets a TD with 3 minutes to go, and another after recovering an onside kick... Box scores and stat lines don't always tell the whole story...
Understandable.. they are both irrelevant and will never get to see their team win a national championship
No he didn’t forget, he’s a trolling twat bag who didn’t wanna point out crucial facts.
Dude, I hope Ferentz is still there when I retire so I can fully enjoy that Iowa thought process that tenure of 59.28 win% coaches gets you greatness from my armchair in my 60's.
Michig
Glad I could get you the real scenario.
Michigan never came close to playing a physical ground game team like Nebraska, they would have been pushed around all game long. Sure, Woodson would have made a lot of tackles 10-15 yards down field, but he would have been, like the rest of his team, on the losing end of the score.
Glad I could get you the real scenario.
Go away this has been debated since 1997, the detroit crack house is wanting you back
Michigan played the buffs week 1 at home. Defense wins early games. NU played the buffs on the road the last week. Home vs away is a 14 pt swing. In Boulder above 5200 ft is worth a few more points.
you all are pathetic. Every time one of these asshats jumps on our forums to start a thread and knows how to reel you in with their stupidity.
The OP neglected to mention that in both common opponent games Michigan was the home team whereas Nebraska was the away team. Anyone who has played a physical sport at a mile high altitude will tell you that it has an effect on you particularly as the game goes on. Both Colorado and Baylor scored 14 points late in the games to make it seem closer than it was. Colorado scored late in the 4th quarter after a Nebraska fumble deep in Colorado territory then recovered an onside kick and scored again. Against Baylor there was a fumble recovery with no time remaining for the last score. In Baylor's case the scores were likely against a second team defense because the Huskers were up 49-7 going into the fourth quarter. All of this will go over the head of the OP. In any case, common opponent comparisons are rarely informative when predicting a head to head match up. Nebraska would have beaten Michigan 8 times out of 10 on a neutral field.
Sshhh....let's just play along a little longer to make him feel special.
