ADVERTISEMENT

Jordan Addison from Pitt is in the Portal

The NCAA has to look into this situation sooner rather than later. The confluence of NIL and liberal transfer policies is threatening to destroy college football. The players deserve a slice of the pecuniary pie. Therefore, keep the NIL but tighten the transfer rules once again: you transfer you gotta sit for a year. Also, you transfer, no NIL money for a year.
 
The NCAA has to look into this situation sooner rather than later. The confluence of NIL and liberal transfer policies is threatening to destroy college football. The players deserve a slice of the pecuniary pie. Therefore, keep the NIL but tighten the transfer rules once again: you transfer you gotta sit for a year. Also, you transfer, no NIL money for a year.
I hate this for the fact that I feel kids should be able to transfer once, since coaches can do as they please. I do think it is needed though to stop this massive free agency issue though
 
  • Like
Reactions: baseball31ne
Maybe they should put a cap on NIL offers? Say, whatever the median annual income is. I’m sure there’s holes in this idea, but it’s better than the Wild West free agency this is turning into.
 
Having to sit a year if you transfer for any reason would be a great start...if that happened a lot of NIL $$$ would dry up, and as soon as a few kids burn the people who gave them the $$$ by leaving before they ever played (and it will happen) this whole crazy thing would settle down fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Glove_Man
The NCAA has to look into this situation sooner rather than later. The confluence of NIL and liberal transfer policies is threatening to destroy college football. The players deserve a slice of the pecuniary pie. Therefore, keep the NIL but tighten the transfer rules once again: you transfer you gotta sit for a year. Also, you transfer, no NIL money for a year.
Only if they put the same restrictions on coaches and AD’s first.
 
Can anybody provide a single reason as to why free agency is bad for college football?
 
It does create a situation where the individual is more important that the team in some respects.. lack of continuity, and may not be the best thing for kids that age in regard to building character.

I can not imagine behing handed half a million dollars at age 21 or so, and having any sort of good outcome for me personally.
 
The NCAA has to look into this situation sooner rather than later. The confluence of NIL and liberal transfer policies is threatening to destroy college football. The players deserve a slice of the pecuniary pie. Therefore, keep the NIL but tighten the transfer rules once again: you transfer you gotta sit for a year. Also, you transfer, no NIL money for a year.
California dreaming on such a windy day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennsyhusker
The NCAA has to look into this situation sooner rather than later. The confluence of NIL and liberal transfer policies is threatening to destroy college football. The players deserve a slice of the pecuniary pie. Therefore, keep the NIL but tighten the transfer rules once again: you transfer you gotta sit for a year. Also, you transfer, no NIL money for a year.
Good idea, but by judging the National Communist Aging A$$holes track record, they will come up with a rule where it's only permissable for the $EC and any other program trying to leverage NIL is guaranteed the death penalty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennsyhusker
Can anybody provide a single reason as to why free agency is bad for college football?
Even the pros have limits to free agency. There has to be some sort of commitment to the schools. This can’t just be open game on rosters every year. Yes, supposedly you can only transfer once without sitting, but the NCAA essentially approves most other transfer requests as long as the player comes up with a ‘personal or family’ reason…
 
Apparently USC under Lincoln Riley is using big time NIL dollars to clean up in the transfer portal. Read somewhere they already have 15 transfers locked up.
 
The NCAA has to look into this situation sooner rather than later. The confluence of NIL and liberal transfer policies is threatening to destroy college football. The players deserve a slice of the pecuniary pie. Therefore, keep the NIL but tighten the transfer rules once again: you transfer you gotta sit for a year. Also, you transfer, no NIL money for a year.
completely agree but to impose those requirements would likely trigger court, eventually Court tests.....constitutional issues.....or not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennsyhusker
The NCAA has to look into this situation sooner rather than later. The confluence of NIL and liberal transfer policies is threatening to destroy college football. The players deserve a slice of the pecuniary pie. Therefore, keep the NIL but tighten the transfer rules once again: you transfer you gotta sit for a year. Also, you transfer, no NIL money for a year.
If money is involved, then contracts and the accompanying obligations should be involved as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennsyhusker
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT