It was a bad call

[Hoosker Du]

You would want to run the route more to inside because out of bounds is incomplete.

That's not necessarily the case. One of the best ways to get separation from a defensive back is to force him to have to turn his hips to the opposite side to run with you, because turning your hips from the left to the right (or vice versa) slows you down for a brief moment.

 

[Catch50]

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, and why that ended up single coverage. Keep bitching like you do. That last drive was almost perfect (sans the stupid late throw by Tommy over the middle). The kid knew exactly where to go with the ball depending on the coverage, and so did our receivers. And you know what, they didn't adhere to your demand that they be the routes you were taught in 5th grade. Keep pushing though, this is so much fun

I'm shocked. I always considered you a good poster. FWIW, I was not a receiver.

I bet if this was an opposing receiver against Nebraska, you would still crying in your milk. That's what happens when we can't beat a good team for many years.

 

[Catch50]

That's not necessarily the case. One of the best ways to get separation from a defensive back is to force him to have to turn his hips to the opposite side to run with you, because turning your hips from the left to the right (or vice versa) slows you down for a brief moment.

Is the rule not if you go out of bounds without being forced out, you are ineligible to receive a pass?
I would say you are correct about the technique. But he was too wide and went out of bounds on his own.

 

[Catch50]

Actually, I work for the State. I am one of the guys that paints those white lines on the interstate.

I said moonlight. Not your day job.

 

[anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi]

I'm shocked. I always considered you a good poster. FWIW, I was not a receiver.

I bet if this was an opposing receiver against Nebraska, you would still crying in your milk. That's what happens when we can't beat a good team for many years.

Actually I think the corner initially played that 100 percent correct. Then when he obviously had no clue where the ball was and the official saw he was off balance, along with making contact... he made what he believed to be the correct call by not throwing the flag. And here's the big surprise... I hate what the game has become with it basically making it against the rules to play defense. But if you don't adapt and take advantage of it, it shows ignorance and stupidity.

 

[anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi]

Is the rule not if you go out of bounds without being forced out, you are ineligible to receive a pass?
I would say you are correct about the technique. But he was too wide and went out of bounds on his own.

Stop saying stupid things. Nowhere does the rule state you have to be "forced" out. It clearly states the receiver can immediately return to the field to make a play if contact was made by the defender when going out of bounds. Once again, you show you are willfully ignorant when it comes to modern football.

 

[Catch50]

Actually I think the corner initially played that 100 percent correct. Then when he obviously had no clue where the ball was and the official saw he was off balance, along with making contact... he made what he believed to be the correct call by not throwing the flag. And here's the big surprise... I hate what the game has become with it basically making it against the rules to play defense. But if you don't adapt and take advantage of it, it shows ignorance and stupidity.

Making a beeline to sideline with the game on the line shows ignorance and stupidity. They got away with. I imagine the NCAA officials review certain plays before the following weekend. I imagine they will instruct their officials to declare the receiver out of bounds from now on. I imagine many coaches who saw this will warn their receivers not to do this.

 

[anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi]

Making a beeline to sideline with the game on the line shows ignorance and stupidity. They got away with. I imagine the NCAA officials review certain plays before the following weekend. I imagine they will instruct their officials to declare the receiver out of bounds from now on. I imagine many coaches who saw this will warn their receivers not to do this.

You are just ignorant if you claim that he was making a beeline for the sideline. And yes I am sure you will never see another sideline route designed to get single coverage that wins the game, coaches hate that shit.

 

[Archie Graham]

What the freaking hell is the point of this thread? The OP can get screwed. I'll gladly take a vacation to lock this. This is stupid.

 

[HuskerDana]

That's not necessarily the case. One of the best ways to get separation from a defensive back is to force him to have to turn his hips to the opposite side to run with you, because turning your hips from the left to the right (or vice versa) slows you down for a brief moment.

Sorry Catch50, just having a little fun with you here. Du is correct here....and this is where I was going to go with an actual serious response. What the db was doing in this situation, is called the pinch technique. The db backpedals, then fips his outside leg- hips over and runs with the receiver, reading the receiver's eyes. He did an okay job of going with the receiver (turning to run), but he did a bad job at getting in the receiver's hip pocket as he forced him to the sideline.....and he DID force him to the sideline, so he was not able to turn and "rake" to make a play on the ball. That is where he "lost" the receiver and BR was in a position to make a play on the ball.....the db wasn't. The path in the route ran by the receiver had more to do with the db than it did the receiver. By the letter of the rule, BR reestablished himself after being forced out of bounds.

Also, re-read a couple of other posts in this thread. They are excellent.

 

[HuskerDana]

Hey Archie.....GET OFF MY LAWN! You better not get this thread shut down.

 

[Archie Graham]

Hey Archie.....GET OFF MY LAWN! You better not get this thread shut down.

K. I'm out.

 

[kaz36]

Moral of this thread. Our coaches suck and we got lucky to win.

 

[Hoosker Du]

Is the rule not if you go out of bounds without being forced out, you are ineligible to receive a pass?
I would say you are correct about the technique. But he was too wide and went out of bounds on his own.

Would you just watch the slow motion video on page 1 of this thread again? You can see Reilly leaning into the DB, because the DB is forcing him toward the sideline. There is no possible way for Reilly to be leaning toward the middle of the field without there being contact, because he would have fallen down.

 

[HuskerDana]

......and the db forced him to the sideline as he is TAUGHT to do. It does not mean you have to have a great deal of contact for the receiver to be forced out of bounds.

 

[Catch50]

You are just ignorant if you claim that he was making a beeline for the sideline. And yes I am sure you will never see another sideline route designed to get single coverage that wins the game, coaches hate that shit.

Ignorant? The film does not lie.

 

[HuskerDana]

What the freaking hell is the point of this thread? The OP can get screwed. I'll gladly take a vacation to lock this. This is stupid.

There is no point to this thread......it's kind of like an episode of Seinfeld.

 

[Archie Graham]

There is no point to this thread......it's kind of like an episode of Seinfeld.

Disagree. The OP is being a douche bag.

 

[anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi]

Funny OP hasn't responded to the three best responses in this thread:

It is because he does not accept those routes as football the way he thinks it should be played.

 

[newAD]

 

[anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi]

Ignorant? The film does not lie.

No, but you lie, and are blind. Ignorant is a more likely explanation

 

[sparky62]

Ignorant? The film does not lie.

Dude give it up. He was forced out of bounds, doesn't have to be pushed, just ridden & forced. The call was made on the field & the booth had to determine that ruling. Pretty simple. Give it up. You know this. BUT you keep coming on here trying to force it for 3 pages.