I like Romo...and it seems like no matter who the personality is, and whether they are on radio or TV....lots of folks think they suck. It's just built into the job.
Ive got zero problem with Nance and Romo. Normally announcers are too dramatic. That works on radio. These two are pretty goodromo called a great game. pointed out flaws time-after-time including taking the ball first and then kicking the field goal leaving it for patrick to decide, which he did. some of you people consider yourselves good but then somehow miss great. he did an excellent job.
But was he able to stay healthy?like i said. some of you who think you're good can't seem to grasp great. tony stayed within the game all night. made calls that were shown afterwards to be spot on. few can do that. he did a great job. but i understand these things are in the eye and ear of the beholder.
Ive got zero problem with Nance and Romo. Normally announcers are too dramatic. That works on radio. These two are pretty good
I disagree with that totally. It was random. It happens. Yes it totally changed the game I should have listed that as one of the main factors in the loss.Hmm . I would say the high school play letting a punt hit off your foot. Actually high schoolers don’t even let that happen. Thats some peewee level play
NEVER in college. Always go last.I think you can argue in college to take the ball first, because you put pressure on the other team to match and there is no advantage to field position. (having four downs to match by going on defense is big here too, but I can see the argument to choose offense)
However in the new NFL playoff format, field position is huge, if you have a turnover or a short punt after a three and out, you are at a huge disadvantage. The potential interception and the holding penalty that avoided the three and out were prime examples of why I think playing defense was the better option. The only plus I see is that you potentially get an extra offensive possession in a game that is won after the first two possessions...since you would essentially score and end the game having had one more possession than the other team after the initial drives...but that is not a significant advantage.
Bro? Random? That was beyond patheticI disagree with that totally. It was random. It happens. Yes it totally changed the game I should have listed that as one of the main factors in the loss.
They had stopped the run pretty good but #23 touching the ball 2 times in the 3rd quarter is unacceptable. Look what happened later it he game. He was wearing them out totally.Yep. CMC getting like 7 yards a carry and you fully abandon the run? That loss is squarely on the head coach for whatever he was trying to do in that 3rd Quarter. They could have ended the game if they just kept running it.
Yes. It randomly hit the guys foot. He was blocking it's not like he can see it coming.Bro? Random? That was beyond pathetic
Why was he a goofball. He ran on the field, and it popped. Could have happened at any time. It's not like he was doing stupid crap when it happened.Greenlaw getting hurt the way he did has to be THE all time most embarrassing injury in the history of the super bowl! I was rofl so freaking hard when I saw how it happened!
The biggest plays by the Chiefs all night (with the exception of that last big gain by Kelce) came by them isolating and abusing that backup linebacker. Probably lose if he hadn't been such a goofball 🤪
They had stopped the run pretty good but #23 touching the ball 2 times in the 3rd quarter is unacceptable. Look what happened later it he game. He was wearing them out totally.
It is a lot of "ifs", but per Shanahan, that was his reasoning. Right or wrong.too many "ifs" involved in that reasoning
I was gogin to reply to you and didnt. It left it in the reply to someone else. SorryNot sure how that happened but I did not type that. Somebody else did.
Bleedred has been porking too many retarded goats so he’s a little off..Why was he a goofball. He ran on the field, and it popped. Could have happened at any time. It's not like he was doing stupid crap when it happened.
Yes, pretty much. Although if the Bills weren't too freaking stupid to just tackle Tyreek Hill at the line of scrimmage and eat the penalty yardage, that game never gets to OT.Didn’t this rule get changed because of Mahomes?
This is the way.Even though some players may not have known, Shanahan is saying he did know the rules and wanted the ball first anyway.
His reasoning; if SF scored, then KC tied it, the next score wins so wanting that 3rd overall possession in OT does make sense.
It's a gamble that didn't work out and to me, the decision isn't totally unreasonable.
The 49ers are the real deal. Athletically gifted across the board, so I'm not sure the Chiefs belonged in the Superbowl.........but Andy Reid sure as hell belonged there.
Niners were the better team. They were out coached. Andy is the manBeen saying for a while the Chiefs D is second best in the entire league...then tack on the worlds best QB, TE, and a great FG kicker plus oh yeah...Andy freaking Reid....not sure why so many loved the Niners in that game so much.
Niners were the better team. They were out coached. Andy is the man
Lazy argument I’d expect from an iowa fanAndy is the man...but the Chiefs were the better team and I have a scoreboard to point to, to prove it.
^^^ THIS ^^^Even though some players may not have known, Shanahan is saying he did know the rules and wanted the ball first anyway.
His reasoning; if SF scored, then KC tied it, the next score wins so wanting that 3rd overall possession in OT does make sense.
It's a gamble that didn't work out and to me, the decision isn't totally unreasonable.
I am a big 49ers fan and I was very surprised they were favored in Vegas. They have now the best odds for next year already. Any odds until week 4 of next year mean zero really though.Been saying for a while the Chiefs D is second best in the entire league...then tack on the worlds best QB, TE, and a great FG kicker plus oh yeah...Andy freaking Reid....not sure why so many loved the Niners in that game so much.
How is it odd. Every team in the Super Bowl will do this . In a one game championship you cover all bases.It was odd. Chris Jones, when asked, said they had gone over it several times in the 2 weeks leading up to the game. They even planned for their 2 point conversion he said if both teams got TDs
exactly. Any team that doesn't is just not coached well.How is it odd. Every team in the Super Bowl will do this . In a one game championship you cover all bases.
Are you sure? How how read it The captain that lost the coin flip had first choice in the second overtime unless the other team deferred. So I think KC would’ve had the choice in the 2nd OT. Maybe I read it wrong.^^^ THIS ^^^
In the new NFL playoff OT rules, you take the ball first with the intent to score a TD. Then if your opponent also scores a TD, you get first crack at sudden death victory.
It's much different than college OT, where you clearly want the other team to go first so you can see what is needed to match.
I thought I remember the team going first in college won a statistically higher % of games. Doesn't make sense but first team wins more.NEVER in college. Always go last.
Not how it works as I understand it. It's like going to the second quarter. That is why the Chiefs were not worried about the clock.Are you sure? How how read it The captain that lost the coin flip had first choice in the second overtime unless the other team deferred. So I think KC would’ve had the choice in the 2nd OT. Maybe I read it wrong.
It looked to me like CMC was getting pretty worn down. He’s got a lot of heart, but he was taking a lot of punishment too. I definitely don’t think he was going to take over the game.They had stopped the run pretty good but #23 touching the ball 2 times in the 3rd quarter is unacceptable. Look what happened later it he game. He was wearing them out totally.
After each team gets a first possession, it goes to sudden death with the team who won the coin flip getting the ball. That is why Shanahan chose to take the ball first.Are you sure? How how read it The captain that lost the coin flip had first choice in the second overtime unless the other team deferred. So I think KC would’ve had the choice in the 2nd OT. Maybe I read it wrong.
This is my understanding as well. If the Chiefs had only kicked a FG in OT and tied it, that would have ended the "each team gets a possession" part of the OT and it would have moved to the next-score-wins phase. I could be wrong but that's my interpretation.Not how it works as I understand it. It's like going to the second quarter. That is why the Chiefs were not worried about the clock.
Basically a new game starts and plays on.
They took ball bc their defense was just on field - needed rest- also if both teams score tds or fgs in OT then goes sudden death so they would have had advantage- it was bc they couldn’t put D back out there consecutivelyBut if they thought a TD would end it....thats why they chose to receive. When that did not pan out out...yeah. FG
....and I don't know if the Niners knew. I am only reading an article where several players admitted they did not know...and SF taking the ball to start OT was ao strange, that I have to wonder
Dumb and obviously didn’t work. I’d rather be down 7 and know I need a td.. then go for 2 to win the thingThey took ball bc their defense was just on field - needed rest- also if both teams score tds or fgs in OT then goes sudden death so they would have had advantage- it was bc they couldn’t put D back out there consecutively
Hardman is dumb but he’s somewhat usefulTo be fair, Mecole Hardman said he didn’t realize initially that the game was over when he scored.
He almost broke a few. Including the toss sweep. Great payer!They had stopped the run pretty good but #23 touching the ball 2 times in the 3rd quarter is unacceptable. Look what happened later it he game. He was wearing them out totally.
no dumber than the 9'rs taking the ball first in otHardman is dumb but he’s somewhat useful