ADVERTISEMENT

How did offense look?

timnsun

Athletic Director
Jan 25, 2008
13,429
21,348
113
I had a funeral this afternoon and didn’t get to see anything except the final drive.

I’m a bit surprised not to see anything about the offense. How did the DH offense look?

I get people are pissed off. I am too. But still… how did things look for the offense? Stats don’t look too terrible… was DH noticeably better?
 
Also, we can bitch all we want, and I can’t stand excuses, but we were two mis-timed DB jumps from a possible win.
Although I have come to despise the 3-3-5

College quarterbacks are easy to rattle and we can’t find a way to put them under any pressure. They just sit back and wait for a guy to get open.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timnsun
OK. We seemed to have a better idea of what we wanted to do and DR was getting the ball out pretty quick. But we only scored 13 offensive points. Of course we had the perfect call on one and DR wouldn’t pull the trigger,so we had to kick an FG and Banks was interfered with on another, which led to another FG
 
If the offense (QB) wasn't so offensive, the defense wouldn't give up so many yds. The defense did more than enough to win this game. Put the loss SOLEY on DR
I guess I didn’t expect our offense to instantaneously be world beaters under Holgorsen. Did we look better than we did under Satt? And if so, will we continue to improve? That’s what I was asking.
 
More creativity, more misdirection, and quick passes. The QB, as usual, missed wide open receivers and held the ball too much. The running game looked decent. There was more continuity with play calling.

Given a better QB, the offense can score more than 13 points.
Also some semblance of a two minute drill at the end. But the offense scored only 10. One FG was off a turnover inside the 20.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truewooper
I guess I didn’t expect our offense to instantaneously be world beaters under Holgorsen. Did we look better than we did under Satt? And if so, will we continue to improve? That’s what I was asking.
Yes it was better. Better flow. It was more fluid. Raiola got the ball out of his hand quick typically. No really stupid play calls like usual. It wasn’t worlds better as expected in 1 week under a new coordinator but definitely better
 
I guess I didn’t expect our offense to instantaneously be world beaters under Holgorsen. Did we look better than we did under Satt? And if so, will we continue to improve? That’s what I was asking.
Better... But would benefit from less personnel changes and maybe more hurry up tempo. DR still throws too many lob passes and needs to learn to have some zing on there or get lost...
 
I thought DR got rid of the ball a little more quickly in this game. Someone, I'm assuming OCDH, drilled into his head he can't be holding the ball back there for 5-6 seconds on every pass.

Someone posted on the game thread, "Has DR thrown any passes that HH can't throw?" and I think that answer is no. By the 4th Qtr I felt HH should have been put in. I think he sees the field a little better than DR and he gives us a another legitimate rush option.

Rhule's game management is really starting to concern me. Maybe the addition of OCDH recently contributed to that confusion today but wow... I could do a better job and believe me, none of you would want that.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT