That's fine. Everyone is always looking for someone else to blame when things don't go as planned.
I have studied the merger of the Big 8 and the SWC pretty extensively. I know through articles that 4 schools bullied the uneven revenue sharing and 4 schools fought hard to have the Tier 3 media rights negotiated by individual schools. Then when 3 of the 4 decided that a big 12 network would be more lucrative to them than a school specific network, they wanted Texas to abandon their LHN plan. When Texas said no, they became the easy guy to blame. The fact that a Husker, Sooner or Aggie network couldn't get the support to get off the ground became secondary. So two of the 4 took their ball and left, 2 of the weak sisters got potentially better offers and left and the remaining 7 had to do whatever Texas wanted because a Big 12 without Texas was not very attractive in the media world.
But again you had four guys that were greedy and 3 got pissed when the 4th got really greedy.
I have studied the merger of the Big 8 and the SWC pretty extensively. I know through articles that 4 schools bullied the uneven revenue sharing and 4 schools fought hard to have the Tier 3 media rights negotiated by individual schools. Then when 3 of the 4 decided that a big 12 network would be more lucrative to them than a school specific network, they wanted Texas to abandon their LHN plan. When Texas said no, they became the easy guy to blame. The fact that a Husker, Sooner or Aggie network couldn't get the support to get off the ground became secondary. So two of the 4 took their ball and left, 2 of the weak sisters got potentially better offers and left and the remaining 7 had to do whatever Texas wanted because a Big 12 without Texas was not very attractive in the media world.
But again you had four guys that were greedy and 3 got pissed when the 4th got really greedy.