Great, another super sensitive wokester. Can you find another board to complain about toxic masculinity? We already have a couple of gender confused people covering that base here.What a bunch of ignorant f—-s !
Great, another super sensitive wokester. Can you find another board to complain about toxic masculinity? We already have a couple of gender confused people covering that base here.What a bunch of ignorant f—-s !
spell check can be an abortion to the mind.Congratulations on buying a dictionary and looking up misogamy. Must have been a really embarrassing moment for someone who fashions himself such an intellectual titan.
Turn it off like I do, then I can look erudite, or vapid all by myself.spell check can be an abortion to the mind.
actually, when the net was invented, the founders found the use of caps unnecessary. it's quicker to avoid them. they add little to context or meaning. i honor that tradition to this day.Turn it off like I do, then I can look erudite, or vapid all by myself.
You must have turned all capitalization, and much punctuation off though.
Italics with punctuation, or run on first grade sentences, you are still a KSU troll on our board.
KSUcks
Why would the self-proclaimed smartest person in all of history rely on a pedestrian crutch like Spell Check? You do know there's an edit function, right? So unless you just used a word you did not know the meaning of, it only takes a few seconds to correct embarrassing mistakes made by that darned Spell Check.spell check can be an abortion to the mind.
What honor of that did years of italics, with capitalization, bestow?actually, when the net was invented, the founders found the use of caps unnecessary. it's quicker to avoid them. they add little to context or meaning. i honor that tradition to this day.
I simply despise having a machine think for me.Why would the self-proclaimed smartest person in all of history rely on a pedestrian crutch like Spell Check? You do know there's an edit function, right? So unless you just used a word you did not know the meaning of, it only takes a few seconds to correct embarrassing mistakes made by that darned Spell Check.
It's also a good practice to avoid using words when you don't know what they mean.I simply despise having a machine think for me.
I also thinks it helps keep one's brain sharper to type each word.
He thought it was several misos at once!It's also a good practice to avoid using words when you don't know what they mean.
Then you don't have to come back later and try to blame your idiotic blunder on Spell Check.
As for capitalization being a waste of time:He thought it was several misos at once!
I had fun with a poster last fall who accused my opinion of being dribble. I told him that dribble ran down your chin, or leg, but drivel was likely the word he was looking for, and in fact his post was drivel.
He got mad and blocked me!!!!
I lived with a Veterinarian for several years in the 90's.As for capitalization being a waste of time:
I once thought that too, but then I was asked to help my Uncle Jack off his horse.
Still waiting for you to point out where I posted misogynous stuff… its really sad they (you) lump all of us together under one umbrella.trying their best to trigger using misogyny principles. it's real sad that they drag us in with their small minds.
umm, try again, as i haven't a clue what you're asking or perhaps it's just a statement not a question?What honor of that did years of italics, with capitalization, bestow?
of course i did not do that at all. only when people, i use the word generously, only when they suggest caitlin clark is somehow a man do i pull their trigger.Still waiting for you to point out where I posted misogynous stuff… its really sad they (you) lump all of us together under one umbrella.
Is that a testicle hanging out of those shorts?of course i did not do that at all. only when people, i use the word generously, only when they suggest caitlin clark is somehow a man do i pull their trigger.
umm, try again, as i haven't a clue what you're asking or perhaps it's just a statement not a question?
She (CC) accepted it privately, but Swoops came out publicly to let everyone know she apologized. My assumption is that there was some sort of motivation for her to do so.
Civil discourse is threatened when everyone speaks in absolutes. Way too many people speak in absolutes and look dumb when proven wrong. Would you rather me sit here and say “CC HAS NEVER DONE ANYTHING DIRTY?” simply because I haven’t seen it? Or should I be open minded about it?Everything after the bold is moot
“I feel like” has replaced “I think” in male language, and society has suffered greatly because of it
Use your brain, not your vag. How you feel is neither here nor there.
she apologized to caitlin. time to move on from the bigot crap. everything in america doesn't have to be reduced to black & white nonsense.
“But I will say what I said to her was I made a mistake in saying it was your fifth year when it is your fourth,” Swoopes continued. “Have nothing but respect for what she has done for the game. And, you know, if she wants to share what her response was and how that conversation went I’ll leave that to her. But it was a really good conversation.” athlon
You miss the point. This isn't about feelings. And you're looking dumb by acting this way trying to avoid looking dumb. Hard to believe you can be an iowa and CC fan and not have seen her antics which have brought her almost as much attention as her play.Civil discourse is threatened when everyone speaks in absolutes. Way too many people speak in absolutes and look dumb when proven wrong. Would you rather me sit here and say “CC HAS NEVER DONE ANYTHING DIRTY?” simply because I haven’t seen it? Or should I be open minded about it?
"Misogyny principles" is that a freshmen class at Iowa?trying their best to trigger using misogyny principles. it's real sad that they drag us in with their small minds.
"This is not B10 protocol" is an amazingly awesome and hilarious quote.
Are there supposed to be boobs under that shirt?of course i did not do that at all. only when people, i use the word generously, only when they suggest caitlin clark is somehow a man do i pull their trigger.
I’ve seen plenty of her “antics”. I haven’t seen her being a serial dirty player, however. Still waiting on proof so I can decide one way or the other.You miss the point. This isn't about feelings. And you're looking dumb by acting this way trying to avoid looking dumb. Hard to believe you can be an iowa and CC fan and not have seen her antics which have brought her almost as much attention as her play.
I've posted a couple links on here and have seen more on here. They're out there and doesn't take much to find them. SorryI’ve seen plenty of her “antics”. I haven’t seen her being a serial dirty player, however. Still waiting on proof so I can decide one way or the other.
y'all are either misogynistic or rivaled-up-blind. caitlin is a generational player. competitive. big personality. you've had plenty of them playing for dr. tom.
Guess I don’t know the meaning of y’all. Is it different in Kansas?of course i did not do that at all. only when people, i use the word generously, only when they suggest caitlin clark is somehow a man do i pull their trigger.
of course i did not do that at all. only when people, i use the word generously, only when they suggest caitlin clark is somehow a man do i pull their trigger.
Google searched “is Caitlin Clark a dirty player”. I only see the two videos posted on here. I’ve already stated the move on Shelley was uncalled for and should have been an intentional foul. Give me a break on the shove to that chick where the video started well after the harassment. Should she have done it? Probably not. But it’s not dirty. I expected more from these allegations.I've posted a couple links on here and have seen more on here. They're out there and doesn't take much to find them. Sorry
mgbreis answered your beer question in the bolt thread. Sounds like it could happen this year upon regents approval.Google searched “is Caitlin Clark a dirty player”. I only see the two videos posted on here. I’ve already stated the move on Shelley was uncalled for and should have been an intentional foul. Give me a break on the shove to that chick where the video started well after the harassment. Should she have done it? Probably not. But it’s not dirty. I expected more from these allegations.
Google Brad Davidson for some real dirty stuff.
What harassment? Since you are the king of wanting all the facts, what exactly did the Purdue-Fort Wayne player do that constituted harassment?Google searched “is Caitlin Clark a dirty player”. I only see the two videos posted on here. I’ve already stated the move on Shelley was uncalled for and should have been an intentional foul. Give me a break on the shove to that chick where the video started well after the harassment. Should she have done it? Probably not. But it’s not dirty. I expected more from these allegations.
Google Brad Davidson for some real dirty stuff.
Using the word “think” instead of “feel” makes nothing more absolute.Civil discourse is threatened when everyone speaks in absolutes. Way too many people speak in absolutes and look dumb when proven wrong. Would you rather me sit here and say “CC HAS NEVER DONE ANYTHING DIRTY?” simply because I haven’t seen it? Or should I be open minded about it?
Since you insisted that the shorter video HAD to be omitting some sort of "harassment," here's expanded video of the shoving incident. The Purdue-FW player doesn't even touch Clark. She was pretty clearly assigned to guard Clark face-up on the entire possession - in other words, guard her as if she has the ball, even when she doesn't.Google searched “is Caitlin Clark a dirty player”. I only see the two videos posted on here. I’ve already stated the move on Shelley was uncalled for and should have been an intentional foul. Give me a break on the shove to that chick where the video started well after the harassment. Should she have done it? Probably not. But it’s not dirty. I expected more from these allegations.
Google Brad Davidson for some real dirty stuff.
This is not B1G protocol to not give CC space!Indiana apparently didn't get the memo that guarding Clark full-time in a face-up position constitutes harassment, or is somehow against the rules. They did exactly that tonight and decidedly kicked Iowa's butt. I wonder what Lisa Bluder will squeal about after this game?
If Iowa fans think we were fabricating info about C Clark, they should run over to the Indiana board. Their posts sound very familiar. Some guy said he was sitting courtside at last night's game and had some interesting observations.Iowa lost again last night, but most importantly, Lisa Bluder made her flight on time.
Thank dog.
we don't pay attention to caitlin.Indiana apparently didn't get the memo that guarding Clark full-time in a face-up position constitutes harassment, or is somehow against the rules. They did exactly that tonight and decidedly kicked Iowa's butt. I wonder what Lisa Bluder will squeal about after this game?