Once again, I wasn't spinning shit. I was responding to an attack you made against me and one where you still haven't admitted you were wrong even though you clearly were. And instead of being a man and admitting it, you try to claim I was spinning. I have absolutely no reason to spin anything, least of all a response to one of your posts. All of my posts are 100% genuine and follow logical and consistent thought processes, something that seems to be a foreign concept to a lot of the posters on here... I wouldn't spin anything you say because I have no reason to; you do more than enough of that on your own.Technically, you tried to spin my post into saying that I made that claim. But I was quickly able to refute that by saying it was clearly Rhule that chose Raiola over McCord because Rhule stated that he didn’t offer a transfer.
Again, I wasn't spinning. If that's your perception, then you were wrong. It would have been a lot easier if you were man enough to admit you were wrong, but instead you accused me of spinning with no basis. Actions have their consequences.Attack? ha ha ha ha Dude it is a message board not a battle field or a game of Risk.
Size matters.Your thinking appears to be that larger receivers aren’t possession receivers. If I am not mistaken you brought up size in another thread. I am just stating that size of receiver has little to do with the type of receiver.
6 transfers!?!?!? We're practically Portal U now. Doesn't Rhule know how to do anything right?
Id take 3 more if we could.6 transfers!?!?!? We're practically Portal U now. Doesn't Rhule know how to do anything right?
You can’t sell something you don’t have. Maybe that’s why we’re doing well on transfers, and the Berkkkeley at the Midwest is not.
My biggest fear is the lack of depth after DR. If it’s HH we won’t be able to run the offense we are projecting. Hopefully DK is a quick study.I mean it's year 1, so he used up his pass already. I expect much better in year 2 and think we'll have the roster to win a lot more games.
In other words, size does matter.Uh ok. Most of the recievers with the most receptions in the nfl are bigger guys. AJ Brown, Cee Dee Lamb, Puka Nacua Davante Adams. Definitely more of them than there are Tyreke Hill or Jaylen Waddle
Ok. Makes sense. Unless your argument is that we need smaller possession type receivers.In other words, size does matter.
The website that rhymes with "ax" is who I use for my scholarship numbers. It shows 98. Anyone who is a former walk-on, portal transfer, or has been here past 4 years is eligible for an NIL walk-on deal. I don't need to name names because we will be at 85 by fall camp. Guaranteed.@Huskers123456, start naming names.
We are one the few teams in CFB that gives everyone, even walkons on the team, some NIL money. That gives us some flexibility.The website that rhymes with "ax" is who I use for my scholarship numbers. It shows 98. Anyone who is a former walk-on, portal transfer, or has been here past 4 years is eligible for an NIL walk-on deal. I don't need to name names because we will be at 85 by fall camp. Guaranteed.
Edit: You think we are cutting good players because we are in some kind of a bind. Far from it. Rhule is way ahead of you and your old way of thinking. It's a new era.
Not really, a lot of teams are doing this. We're not unique giving NIL to walkons.We are one the few teams in CFB that gives everyone, even walkons on the team, some NIL money. That gives us some flexibility.
I don't know what that means, can you link it?The website that rhymes with "ax" is who I use for my scholarship numbers. It shows 98. Anyone who is a former walk-on, portal transfer, or has been here past 4 years is eligible for an NIL walk-on deal. I don't need to name names because we will be at 85 by fall camp. Guaranteed.
Edit: You think we are cutting good players because we are in some kind of a bind. Far from it. Rhule is way ahead of you and your old way of thinking. It's a new era.
No. Linking a rival site would probably get me suspended.I don't know what that means, can you link it?