The overriding point is you just made that up.I believe he’s in sales. But the overriding point is that many use it as a source of entertainment and makes 0 impact on their financial lives.
of course it was made up - I have no idea. My point was that your little PSA on gambling is literally known by everyone already. It seemed you left little to no interpretation of gambling being a purely spend for entertainment. Likely, the majority of gamblers are in that category.The overriding point is you just made that up.
You honestly admit your fabrications. Given the atmosphere of this bbs, I guess that counts as admirable.of course it was made up - I have no idea. My point was that your little PSA on gambling is literally known by everyone already. It seemed you left little to no interpretation of gambling being a purely spend for entertainment. Likely, the majority of gamblers are in that category.
I was using Kong as an example because he posts his picks each week. My impression of Kong is that he’s successful and therefore would likely fall into that category where his gambling doesn’t take food off the table.
???? I said “I would wager” another poster makes good money. Not that I knew that he did. You implied I stated it as a fact - which I never did and responded to that.You honestly admit your fabrications. Given the atmosphere of this bbs, I guess that counts as admirable.
Like most threads on here I feel like I am arguing with 16 year olds. 'I would wager' isn't some magical term that allows you to gin up any scenario you want. Frankly, it was a pretty bizzare thing to say.???? I said “I would wager” another poster makes good money. Not that I knew that he did. You implied I stated it as a fact - which I never did and responded to that.
How can speculation be a fabrication?
More bizarre than 1200+ posts, over the past 18 months, on the message board of a team you don't even cheer for?Like most threads on here I feel like I am arguing with 16 year olds. 'I would wager' isn't some magical term that allows you to gin up any scenario you want. Frankly, it was a pretty bizzare thing to say.
Like most threads on here I feel like I am arguing with 16 year olds. 'I would wager' isn't some magical term that allows you to gin up any scenario you want. Frankly, it was a pretty bizzare thing to say.
Right???!!!More bizarre than 1200+ posts, over the past 18 months, on the message board of a team you don't even cheer for?
Like most threads on here I feel like I am arguing with 16 year olds. 'I would wager' isn't some magical term that allows you to gin up any scenario you want. Frankly, it was a pretty bizzare thing to say.
Everything he said about me is correctLike most threads on here I feel like I am arguing with 16 year olds. 'I would wager' isn't some magical term that allows you to gin up any scenario you want. Frankly, it was a pretty bizzare thing to say.
This interesting - I thought Pascal was a husker fan so I’ve tried to be cool. This news may change the game.More bizarre than 1200+ posts, over the past 18 months, on the message board of a team you don't even cheer for?
Congrats on the high salary. 300k, thats a chunk each year.Everything he said about me is correct
I wager because I find it to be enjoyable
I have never and will never claim to be any kind of sharp or to have any kind of edge
Just here for entertainment purposes only. There are a few knowledgeable people but most of this board is irrational bitch slapping by grown men. Better than Netflix.I read "I would wager" exactly as he meant it, and that is as a guess at best. You are the one trying to make it something it wasn't. Just go away already, your crap is old and unappreciated by all.
I am but 16 year olds accuse everyone they don't line up 100 percent with as trolls and Iowa fans.This interesting - I thought Pascal was a husker fan so I’ve tried to be cool. This news may change the game.
I am but 16 year olds accuse everyone they don't line up 100 percent with as trolls and Iowa fans.
SWIowa - what are you thinking about Iowa’s 6.5? Coming off a 10 win year with your starting qb back as well as nearly your entire defense?UCLA under 5.5 at +126 has some good value with their schedule, IMO.
Ioway and Nebraska win/lose totals are both 7.5SWIowa - what are you thinking about Iowa’s 6.5? Coming off a 10 win year with your starting qb back as well as nearly your entire defense?
Thanks - at least that tells us what the public thought if they both moved by 1Ioway and Nebraska win/lose totals are both 7.5
Public is always on the overThanks - at least that tells us what the public thought if they both moved by 1
Me and a friend pick 5 teams each...every season and bet on their win totals. It is fun.Public is always on the over
It’s been 7 years I believe since NU over bettors have collected
Yeah man it’s crazy how easy it is. Can just log into an app and gamble as much to you want. DangerousI’ve seen what gambling can do to families when it’s not just for entertainment. It’s extremely sad and devastating. However grouping every gambler into this group is different. I can’t remember what Kong said he bet on games. He probably had less than $500 a week in action. I would wager Kong makes north of $300k a year. Not a big deal for entertainment and he’s likely just putting his winnings back in action and not actually footing $500 a week out of his regular earnings.
If a family is tight on money and you aren’t saving for retirement or college for your kids you shouldn’t be gambling.
I hit over 6.5 at -122 the morning it came out with my biggest amount ever. I feel pretty damn good about that one. Iowa hasn’t won fewer than 7 regular season games since 2012 and return almost the entire defense. UCLA, MSU, and Washington will have new staffs and they get ISU, Wisconsin, and Nebraska at home.SWIowa - what are you thinking about Iowa’s 6.5? Coming off a 10 win year with your starting qb back as well as nearly your entire defense?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the threshold for what constitutes "clicking" is pretty low.Over 7.5 is going to depend on how long the new offense takes to get clicking.
Wow. You know you're an annoying loser when you invade someone else's board and just start threads begging for someone to talk to you.Fanduel released O/U’s for 2024.
O U
Iowa 6.5 -144/+118
Nebraska 6.5. -154/+126
Wisconsin 6.5. -106/-114
Minnesota 4.5. -152/+126
UCLA 5.5. -162/+128
Colorado 5.5. -108/-120
I feel so much better now. Thanks for the update on your supposed gambling addiction.I hit over 6.5 at -122 the morning it came out with my biggest amount ever. I feel pretty damn good about that one. Iowa hasn’t won fewer than 7 regular season games since 2012 and return almost the entire defense. UCLA, MSU, and Washington will have new staffs and they get ISU, Wisconsin, and Nebraska at home.
Over 7.5 is going to depend on how long the new offense takes to get clicking. Losing to ISU and/or Minnesota early would hurt of course. At Maryland is apparently more scary than I thought with Vegas putting their O/U total at 7.5. Wasn’t expecting that.